Bush is lying about old deception (Al Jazeera repeating Dem talking points)

Al Jazeera ^ | Nov. 27, 2005 | Al Jazeera editorial

[manwiththehands]

I just learned this. Thanks for the tip. I don't see the difference, though. Both speak for Islam, don't they?

[napscoordinator]

as Americans start to rub sleep away from their eyes...

Wow. I had no idea we were sleeping for the last five years and we conservatives have been kicking some ass. Just think of how much better we would have done had we been awake...sarc

[strange1]

(Al Jazeera repeating Dem talking points)

I think the title is backwards, "Dem repeating Al Jazeera talking points". Actualy they appear to be interchangeable, and are nearly synomonus.

[Matchett-PI]

"And, the leftists want us to believe that they are the "loyal" opposition. This editorial is proof positive that they are traitors giving aid and comfort to the enemy."

This post in another thread fits well here, too:

"This great work was created by Zacs Mom." ~ Grampa Dave

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.

An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known, and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very hall of government itself.

For the traitor appears no traitor. He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in hearts of men.

He rots the soul of a nation. He works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city. He infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A Murderer Is Less To Be Feared." Cicero, 42 B.C.

PS ~ FYI, in cased any of you missed reading the thread which featured this [11/28/05 issue of] U.S.News & World Report [Michael Barone] article: The (Very) Big Lie ... it's a damn fine read! 8 posted on 11/27/2005 9:30:31 AM EST by Grampa Dave ---- (Watch the rats re Iraq in 1998)

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for posting Zacs Mom great pictorial collage of the lunatic left.

Just a few decades ago, these lunatics would have been locked up to protect themselves and society from them.

Now, thanks to the MSM redoing what is sane and insane, these lefty lunatics are portrayed as the great ones.

[FairOpinion]

" don't see the difference, though. Both speak for Islam, don't they?"

===

Exactly. This is what their Muslim/Arab readers read.

Saying that this is not the Al Jazeera TV network, is like saying that the New York Times is NOT CNN. Soooo?

They are still the same lying MSM, and the various Arab media is still parroting the Dem lying talking points.

[MinuteGal]

That police lineup is overwhelming and frightening.

God Save the Republic.

(....we shall overcome, heheh)

Leni

[DustyMoment]

There's a picture missing of the latest anti-America hero - Cindy Sheehan.

[USS Alaska]

al jazerra, al gore, al franken, al queda, all speaking from the same koran. Bush lied, we tell the truth. Republicans bad, al queda {the middle eastern branch of the demonRAT party} good.

[Republican Wildcat]

The Democrats do indeed give aide and comfort to the enemy. How many more terrorists will be inspired by this Al Jazeera report the Democrats have helped to spawn? How many more soldiers and how many more innocent people will die because of the Democrats' actions? Do they care?

[Matchett-PI]

"Thanks for posting Zacs Mom great pictorial collage of the lunatic left."

You're welcome. I'm glad I happened to see it on the other thread where you posted it. Trouble is, they are just the tip of the iceberg of what constitutes the enemy within this country. I saw Dr. Walid Phares being interviewed on Fox yesterday about his new book, so looked him up on Google. Chapter 13 especially was mentioned by the host as "knocking his socks off". The book is entitled, "Future Jihad Terrorist Strategies Against America" by Dr. Walid Phares

One excerpt from International early reviews:

From Paulo Casaca, Socialist Member of the European Parliament. Chairman, NATO delegation at the EUP.

"Walid Phares Jihad anatomy"

"The Islamist Jihad on the United States did not start on September eleven 2001; indeed it was preceded by several other attacks as well as a formal war declaration from Bin Laden. However, America was taken absolutely by surprise. Phares' book is the best comprehensive explanation so far of this paradox: American society - including its Academia, Public Opinion, Business and Political establishment - was made dormant by a systematic and unchallenged action from the Salafist circles, and that's the reason why of the success of the attack.

This book is a must read not only for all those in America who want to better understand their enemies but specially to those who are facing the "soft-jihad" infiltration in their societies that took place before in America."

[SNIP] Click link to read more.

"Just a few decades ago, these lunatics would have been locked up to protect themselves and society from them. Now, thanks to the MSM redoing what is sane and insane, these lefty lunatics are portrayed as the great ones."

Only ignoble moral relativists will buy into what Cicero called "[the enemy's] appeal to the baseness that lies deep in hearts of men"

Those of more noble character consistently resist giving in to their baser instincts and refuse to sell out their country for personal gain (temporary fame and fortune).

One finds NO noble mentalities who want to identify themselves with what has become the majority base of today's RAT party.

The emasculated RAT "blame America first / anti-war kook-fringe" Party is responsible for the fact that our enemies were emboldened by our show of weakness at every turn. They are the cause of us being viewed around the world as a "paper tiger". They, and those who voted for them, are responsible for the 9/11 attack on our own soil which killed more people than the attack on Pearl Harbor.

These enemies within that Cicero so accurately described, can never be safely entrusted with the reins of power and the security of the United States again.

Noble Americans will see to it.

[Canard]

"Saying that this is not the Al Jazeera TV network, is like saying that the New York Times is NOT CNN"

Not really. Looking at the site, it's more like claiming that some random blogger isn't CNN. From what I can google, aljazeera.com is a electronic version of what used to be a print magazine, but is now only distributed in electronic form. According to their response to a complaint filed by Al Jazeera tv they claim:

"It has operated in London since 1992, but has a regional office in Dubai, which is the address for the administrative and technical contact for the domain name. It says that it operates a publishing business in which it employs 32 members of staff globally, with offices in the United Kingdom and in Dubai, and editorial teams in the United Kingdom, Egypt, and Malaysia."

http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2005/d2005-0309.html

By their own numbers, they only claim 8000 subscribers and certainly wouldn't qualify as 'mainsream media' especially in the Middle East. Nor do they make any pretence at impartial reporting (one of the main links on the homepage is titled 'conspiracy theories'!)

[Matchett-PI]

"There's a picture missing of the latest anti-America hero - Cindy Sheehan."

Free Republic would run out of bandwidth if we tried to post all their pictures. One of them (Ramsey Clarke) is headed over to Iraq right now to help defend Saddam Hussein.

See my link in post # 31 to a new book that just came out.

[edpc]

That gallery is proof of the old saying "politics is showbusiness for ugly people."

[t2buckeye]

Whenever ANY Dem starts to say that he supports the troops and not the war, remind them of this....when you cannot distinguish between the Democrats position and that of AlJazeera, we know that the Dems in this country are no better than Tokyo Rose. Do they have the right to dissent? Absolutely. However, the words they speak..calling Bush a liar, ignoring their earlier support by revising history, insisting on a time table despite the fact that they KNOW it would play into the terrorists hands...are in fact treasonous. They WANT us to lose this war only because they WANT power. PUre and simple.

[Grampa Dave]

Thanks for the links and info.

I have pinged a couple of FR's historians and keepers of little known knowledge.

[Matchett-PI]

You're welcome!