Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More on the CIA war against Bush
The American Thinker ^ | December 1, 2005 | None cited

Posted on 12/01/2005 5:33:44 AM PST by Quilla

 

The American Thinker has connected a number of dots in the ongoing CIA effort to subvert an elected American president.  John Hinderaker now suggests that high officials in the CIA itself  deliberately exposed the Agency’s covert flights to transport terrorists to interrogation centers around the world

The New York Times and Washington Post cited CIA sources when they told the world the details – air carriers, flight dates, airports and countries involved. That is all information Osama bin Ladin would love to know. This unbelievably irresponsible publicity could destabilize governments or kill people. But if the Agency had any objection to the blowing of one of its most sensitive operations since the Cold War, apparently it didn’t tell NYT or WaPo.

“The twin leaks to the Times and the Post have severely impaired the agency’s ability to carry out renditions, transport prisoners, and maintain secret detention facilities. It is striking that top-level CIA officials are evidently willing to do serious damage to their own agency’s capabilities and operations for the sake of harming the Bush administration and impeding administration policies with which they disagree.”

“The CIA is an agency in crisis. Perhaps, though, there is a ray of hope:the agency has referred the secret-prison leak to the Post to the Justice Department for investigation and possible criminal prosecution.”

Conclusion: Some well-placed CIA officers are serving the media, not the Government of the United States – or the people. They are endangering their own agents at the frontlines, and undoubtedly other sources as well.

It now seems as if the war against Bush has become a war within CIA. Killing the terrorist transport program would certainly undermine Administration policy, the major goal of the new Iron Triangle of power in the country—- the CIA, the media and the Left. Some sources might be currying favor with the NYT-WaPo axis, perhaps to get their help in covering up their own misconduct in the Plame-Wilson affair. After all, reporters will now be compelled to testify in the Libby trial—and who knows what they might reveal?

The US Congress has oversight powers over the secret bureaucracy. Nothing is more important than for it to carry out an aggressive investigation of sabotage by newsleak.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushhaters; cia; cialeak; plamegate; presidentbush; prisons; torture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
It appears as though the CIA is attacking the Administration with a thousand cuts.
1 posted on 12/01/2005 5:33:45 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Quilla

This is nothing short of a coup... Plame/Rove was also part of it.


2 posted on 12/01/2005 5:38:16 AM PST by johnny7 (“You have a corpse in a car, minus a head, in the garage. Take me to it.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

the agency has referred the secret-prison leak to the Post to the Justice Department for investigation and possible criminal prosecution.”


This is the Plame game scenario. Look for the investigation to target a Bush administration official as the leaker.


3 posted on 12/01/2005 5:40:21 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Didn't all this start 45 years ago on a grassy knoll??


4 posted on 12/01/2005 5:40:30 AM PST by xcamel (a system poltergeist stole it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

I'd certainly appreciate Porter Goss shutting down this subversive operation.


5 posted on 12/01/2005 5:41:41 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Porter Goss and the Justice Department had better get to the bottom of this. There is true EVIL afoot and my guess is that liberals, the media, and Democrats (all the same) have their fingerprints all over this.


6 posted on 12/01/2005 5:43:03 AM PST by Obadiah ( Deuteronomy 6:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
"The US Congress has oversight powers over the secret bureaucracy. Nothing is more important than for it to carry out an aggressive investigation of sabotage by newsleak."


Who will investigate Congress????
7 posted on 12/01/2005 5:48:48 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Let's get this straight. Valerie Plame, the flamboyant, in-your-face CIA analyst, is "outed" and the Left screams bloody murder over a complete non-story which has not done and will not do anyone any harm.

However, when a critical, treasonous leak puts real people - indeed, the entire country - at risk, the Left is silent.

Pray to God - PRAY TO GOD - that good Americans who see this farce playing out are still in the majority. If not, we could be the last generation of what we think of as "Americans."

Let NO other issue cloud your thinking. Conservative judges and a Republican Congress are the only things separating us from becoming a socialist, second-rate nation. Hand this country back to the Dems and the MSM, and they'll have succeeded in dragging further down the path to one-worldism, or worse, sharia.

Again, IMHO only one issue matters: security. In this dangerous era, social issues must take a back seast.


8 posted on 12/01/2005 5:48:59 AM PST by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
"I'd certainly appreciate Porter Goss shutting down this subversive operation."

So would the president, I'm sure. Not easy to move such an entrenched group; overcoming the inertia may take years.

A few years back, I was hearing from someone who had a relative in the CIA, and that person's views were exactly what you would expect if you believe that the CIA is deliberately undermining US policy in this area.

9 posted on 12/01/2005 5:52:46 AM PST by Texas dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Not the whole agency, but one or two (my guess) Clinton Era people. That would be enough to make the whole agency look bad.

As for Congress, can you imagine them keeping a secret?

10 posted on 12/01/2005 5:55:02 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
"There is true EVIL afoot and my guess is that liberals, the media, and Democrats (all the same) have their fingerprints all over this."

That's the same thing I've been thinking. I started looking that way shortly after Katrina. Why else I wondered, did the media build up such a frenzy over it and then we find out it was all lies? All their story's were lies!

They got everything wrong? No, you don't make that many mistakes by accident. And that's why I thought the Governors unwillingness to let the President send in the military and the media putting out false stories while she kept the help at bay, were all connected to the dems and maybe the CIA. And I thought they were going for a coup

I still do.

11 posted on 12/01/2005 5:57:15 AM PST by GloriaJane (http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Merry Christmas To Our Troops In Iraq (My Hero's)")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

I sincerely hope that the Bush administration is letting this open sore fester in preparation for a blockbuster set of hearings (Able Danger, Libby trial, Tom Delay trail, CIA leaks) just prior to the 2006 midterm election. I know I'm trying to find a silver lining in a dark cloud, but, as has been shown previously, the Bush administration is loathe to tip their hand prematurely.


12 posted on 12/01/2005 5:57:25 AM PST by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Ever since the 1973 Church Committee, the CIA has been padded with bureaucratic pantywaists. It has become obvious that they, who prefer to do their work at embassy cocktail parties... or possibly on the Internet... also happen to be radical, liberal Democrats.
13 posted on 12/01/2005 5:57:41 AM PST by johnny7 (“You have a corpse in a car, minus a head, in the garage. Take me to it.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

mark


14 posted on 12/01/2005 5:58:05 AM PST by sauropod ("The love that dare not speak its' name has now become the love that won't shut the hell up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Lets not forget the State Department!
Former home of Larry Johnson and Walter Pincus's wife Ann.
Also the former home of Mr. Wilkerson, who claimed that the White House highjacked U.S. foreign policy.
In addition,Joe and Val, in their own words, claim that during March of 03 Val was in the process of moving from non-official to official cover at the Dept. of State (Vanity Fair-January 2004).
Kerry campaign=CIA=State


15 posted on 12/01/2005 5:58:06 AM PST by Bob from De
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The CIA has apparently become a malignant cancer, devouring it's own cells.


16 posted on 12/01/2005 6:03:08 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Okay, bring our troops home. But don't feign suprise when the terrorists tag along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

I think there are more than two problem employees from the CIA. Consider also, that the Clintons fired and replaced just about anyone they could in any branch of the government while they were in office. I think the justice department is particularly a problem since that is where they go when found out (Sandy Berger, e.g.) so that they can skate. (Yes, I know Berger was convicted, but that was a slap on the wrist.) Even the White House travel office was replaced by Clinton cronies. At the time, I thought it was just cronyism, but now I wonder if even the travel office was covering up for Clinton crimes.


17 posted on 12/01/2005 6:13:46 AM PST by IndyInVa (There either needs to be less corruption, or more opportunity for me to participate in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IndyInVa

IIRC, one of the first things clinton did was fire all 93 U.S Attorney Generals.


18 posted on 12/01/2005 6:16:09 AM PST by mikeybaby (long time lurker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Frank Gaffney was on Fox & Friends this morning making this very point.


19 posted on 12/01/2005 6:29:13 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

btt


20 posted on 12/01/2005 6:38:31 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson