Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Barnes: The Moderates' Moment (Moderate House Republicans have more power than ever before)
The Weekly Standard ^ | December 9, 2005 | Fred Barnes

Posted on 12/09/2005 3:20:48 PM PST by RWR8189

REPUBLICAN MODERATES, only two dozen or so strong, believe they now hold a pivotal position in the House of Representatives and can influence legislation and internal Republican affairs as never before. Oddly enough, House Democrats have put them in this key position.

With Democrats in lockstep opposition to all Republican proposals, the votes of moderates are now critical to the passage of any Republican-backed legislation. "This the moderates' moment," said Rep. Sherry Boehlert of New York. He said the "power" of moderates is still "emerging."

Boehlert and Rep. Chris Shays of Connecticut, leaders of the moderate Mainstream Partnership, met with reporters Thursday at a breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. They insisted, among other things, that moderate Republicans favor the election of a new House majority leader to replace Tom DeLay, who was forced to step down temporarily because he's under indictment in Texas for alleged money laundering. Shays said an election of a new leader would likely come in early February.

Moderates make up a small percentage of the 231 House Republicans and their clout has been minimal in recent years. But with Democrats under pressure not to cooperate with Republicans, they now have a "seat at the table" in Republican deliberations, Boehlert said. By bullying Democrats who want to work with Republicans, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi is actually "empowering" Republican moderates.

This was demonstrated last month on a bill that included $50 billion in spending cuts. Moderates forced House Republican leaders to drop from the bill a measure to open the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to oil drilling. Boehlert said the moderate view was simple: "If ANWR is in, we're out." And moderates also got "specific language" dealing with their other concerns in the bill, he said.

Moderates also showed this fall what can happen when their concerns are not accommodated. With Democrats and moderate Republicans joining together, the House passed a bill calling for broader federal support of stem-cell research. It was opposed by Republican leaders and the White House.

While they don't have an agenda, Boehlert said, there are a number of issues on which moderates try to play an increased role. These include the following:

Taxes. Moderates mostly oppose the elimination of the federal estate tax. Shays, a strong supporter of President Bush's tax cuts, said killing the estate tax would not produce any significant economic incentives.

Energy. Moderates want to force Republican leaders to bring up CAFE standards for a vote. These involve the minimum gas mileage for automobiles. Moderates want to hike the minimum level.

Ideas. Boehlert said the House leaders and the White House are now receptive to their ideas on expanded spending on scientific research and on workplace issues. A group of moderates conferred recently with Josh Bolten, the White House budget chief.

Civil liberties. Shays said moderates are wary of increasing the government's power to investigate terrorism if that entails new curbs on civil liberties.

Political reform. Shays said the issue of corruption and ethics violations amount to a "huge" political problem for Republicans. He said a package of reforms devised by liberal Democrats is one he wished moderate Republicans had proposed.

With Republican moderates, there's always a question about their moxie and their follow-through. Will they really exploit their critical position as swing votes in the House? In the past, they've talked big, then failed to stay united and pressing their concerns aggressively. This time, the opportunity for them to exert influence is greater than ever. We'll soon see if they're able to seize it.

Fred Barnes is executive editor of The Weekly Standard.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; dinos; fredbarnes; moderates; rinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: RWR8189

Let's make a list and check it twice.
Want to give our funds to men or mice?


21 posted on 12/09/2005 3:41:51 PM PST by maxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Stifler

-- the power to determine whether they want the Republicans to be the majority party...
-----
Amazing what a "little" corruption and deceit will do.


22 posted on 12/09/2005 3:43:26 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

Appearances are deceiving. I was "agreeing" for sake of argument. The point is that Shays doesn't have a point, because his foundational assumption is that we don't own our own money.


23 posted on 12/09/2005 3:45:37 PM PST by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

It is interesting that 9 Democrats voted for the tax cut extentions yesterday.


24 posted on 12/09/2005 3:56:59 PM PST by rushmom (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

What I'd like to know is how come the RATS can maintain NAZI strength party discipline while republicans act like a herd of cats?


25 posted on 12/09/2005 4:05:22 PM PST by Nateman (In the spirit of friendship reach out to a RAT, then slap the scumbag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: RWR8189

modeRATS of either party are still RATS.


27 posted on 12/09/2005 4:43:56 PM PST by mombonn (¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
This time, the opportunity for them to exert influence is greater than ever.

Just think of the influence they will have wielded when the '06 election comes. If the Republicans lose the House, the RINOs will be the ones responsible. When the Democrats take over, they will have to decide which they would prefer to be - back bench nobody Democrats with crappy committee assignments or members of the Republican minority with no power at all. What a bright future!

28 posted on 12/09/2005 4:49:44 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

These "moderates" are leftists. Fred Barnes must be getting early stage Alzheimers.

There are no "moderates" in the Republican ranks. Most Republicans are pretty left of center, with a solid liberal ideology. Then you have the flaming liberals. Then you have a few Marxists.

There are no moderates, and there are no conservatives in the Republican ranks. Just various degrees of leftists.


29 posted on 12/09/2005 5:14:46 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
We should just refuse to fund their re-election campaigns.

Just for the sake of argument, assume they don't rely on our money anymore. If they did, they would've never traveled the road they're on. The money they take into their chest from US, is a mere pittance. Blackbird.

30 posted on 12/09/2005 5:22:46 PM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Sickening. Might as well give those seats to the Democrats.


31 posted on 12/09/2005 8:44:54 PM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

I'm surprised the democrats don't want to eliminate the estate tax. After all, IT IS FOR THE CHILDREN. (/sarcasm)


32 posted on 12/09/2005 10:54:16 PM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT conservatives are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Most Republicans are pretty left of center, with a solid liberal ideology. Then you have the flaming liberals. Then you have a few Marxists.

You need help.

33 posted on 12/09/2005 10:55:44 PM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT conservatives are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

You must not follow current events and political records/votes/research/history.

1] Senator Santorum (RINO-PA) wants to give/follow the UN guidelines and give a fixed % of our GDP to global charity.

2] Senator Charles Grasley (RINO-IA) wants to force the oil indstry to give a fixed % of their profits to the poor.

3] Senator Bill Frist (RINO-TN) said he would accept a windfall profits tax on the oil industry.

Not what I said was FACT! You may be a RNC cheerleader and beleive the Republicans are all a bunch of Constitutionalists . . . go ahead and cheer all you want. You must like being in a fan club and screaming in line to get autographs of your idiols and such.

Yes sir, what I said is proved by FACT! Most Republicans [in Congress] are leftists.


34 posted on 12/10/2005 6:38:21 AM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson