Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Post ^ | 17 December 2005 | Kayla Bunge

Posted on 12/17/2005 3:58:48 AM PST by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 2,121-2,129 next last
To: CarolinaGuitarman
XS>Has it been observed twice, published and independently observed?"

CG> Yes, but if you took a philosophy of science class, you would know that direct observation isn't a requirement for a scientific theory. MOST scientific theories have a lot of indirect evidence. Again, next time actually take the class, or study harder.

171 posted on 12/17/2005 10:22:13 AM MST by CarolinaGuitarman

You are right; it has been deconstructed in our post-modern universities.

When I took the course, direct observation was mandatory.

b'shem Y'shua

181 posted on 12/17/2005 9:34:33 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

Thx, but it's apparently not a new creationist canard - it didn't take long to google up the reality of the situation. Ya gotta love this internet thingy :)


182 posted on 12/17/2005 9:34:42 AM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Your adversary might respond like his academic counterparts, “The faculty on campus is I am under no obligation to waste its my time supporting Hovind’s evolutionists' little charade.”

Please don't attack me; I'm just an innocent bystander :^)

183 posted on 12/17/2005 9:36:35 AM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
" When I took the course, direct observation was mandatory."

No it wasn't. We have never directly observed an electron, have we? No. It's all INDIRECT evidence. You must have slept through your class. No wonder you didn;t pass it. :)

BTW, we have DIRECTLY observed new species forming:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
184 posted on 12/17/2005 9:38:07 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Mazel Tov

Have a nice journey!

b'shem Y'shua

185 posted on 12/17/2005 9:41:36 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

Bye!


186 posted on 12/17/2005 9:41:56 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Full Court

"This fact was not translated into English and made public until 1971 - nearly 100 years later!"

Not sure about this "fact". Looks like Huxley admitted the error.

"Bathybius was not a fossil, but a putative primitive organism that was "discovered" living on ocean floors. It was a gelatinous layer with tiny granules in it that were sometimes observed to move around. In 1868, Thomas Huxley named it Bathybius haeckelii, because it seemed much like Ernst Haeckel's idea of a very primitive organism -- Urschleim or ancestral slime.

However, during the Challenger expedition (1872-1875), chemist John Buchanan noticed that Bathybius appeared in ocean-floor samples preserved with alcohol, but not those in normal seawater. After some experimentation, he discovered that he could produce Bathybius by adding alcohol to an ocean-floor sample; this "organism" turned out to be a precipitate of calcium sulfate. When the expedition returned, Huxley "ate leek", but otherwise took it in stride. For more details, check out this Huxley archive (http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/guide9.html)."

From: http://www.evowiki.org/index.php/Fake_fossils


187 posted on 12/17/2005 9:43:48 AM PST by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
how can he make a $250,000 offer?

No, no, he's got no money. Nope, none at all. Just kiddie rides in his back yard.

But, Full Court knows all. Never mind that couple of million he scammed from idiot true believers and didn't bother to report 'cause he's a preacher with a little tax protester flavor mixed in.

She can't comprehend simple English, but she just knows her boy is innocent. Innocent, I tell ya, innocent!

188 posted on 12/17/2005 9:44:26 AM PST by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
If you had read the link you would know that the "offer" comes with an asterisk that has absolutely nothing to do with evolution. Now, get back on your stake.
189 posted on 12/17/2005 9:47:06 AM PST by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: stormer

Oops - The period and close quote goofs up that link. Try this: http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/guide9.html


190 posted on 12/17/2005 9:48:02 AM PST by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Mazel Tov Have a nice journey! b'shem Y'shua

lehitra'ot eizel

191 posted on 12/17/2005 9:49:14 AM PST by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: metmom
I actually attended one of Hovind's presentations years ago. It was much lamer than even I (at that time very familiar with the antievolution movement) expected. For instance at one point he was discussing discrimination against creationists. Asked for examples of "science journals" that had refused to publish creationist research he cited two: National Geographic Magazine and The Readers Digest. (Yep, seriously. I nearly fell out of my chair.)
192 posted on 12/17/2005 9:49:53 AM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Full Court

Well, you may be pig-ignorant and devilishly dishonest but, with posts like this, you're certainly good for a hearty belly laugh! Thanks for sending me off to do my chores with a huge smile.


193 posted on 12/17/2005 9:51:17 AM PST by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster; sirchtruth
Well Sagan said its fact, some of your cultist buds here say its fact.

You with them or not? No schukn n jivin now either.

Wolf
194 posted on 12/17/2005 9:52:09 AM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

LOL - What about the Weekly Reader?


195 posted on 12/17/2005 9:52:59 AM PST by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow
[...it didn't take long to google up the reality of the situation. Ya gotta love this internet thingy...]


It comes in handy when debating the latest Bush basher I hear tossing out "Haliburton", "selected, not elected", Bush lied, people died.", "tax breaks for his rich oil buddies" and other such brainless pap.
196 posted on 12/17/2005 9:53:02 AM PST by spinestein (All journalists today are paid advocates for someone's agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
Well, you [Full Court] may be pig-ignorant and devilishly dishonest but, with posts like this, you're certainly good for a hearty belly laugh!

Pig-ignorant is a bit too charitable. But, the ownership of FC is complete.

All hail Dr. Dino!

Assuming he hasn't shut his garbage site down, he will be civilly enjoined at some point. It's also pretty obvious that he'll either plead guilty to various tax crimes or be indicted at some point.

All hail Dr. Dino!

197 posted on 12/17/2005 10:01:15 AM PST by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

It's always fun to find whatever crackpot source the script is coming from.


198 posted on 12/17/2005 10:04:47 AM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Full Court
Even Darwin, who called this his ‘strongest single class of facts’, was duped.

Too funny. You need to examine your timelines. Cretin.

199 posted on 12/17/2005 10:06:46 AM PST by Thatcherite (F--ked in the afterlife, bullying feminized androgenous automaton euro-weenie blackguard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
Don't you remember when your ancestors were swimin' around? Someone HAD to come up out of the water to take that first breath!

Lungfish

200 posted on 12/17/2005 10:08:48 AM PST by MRMEAN (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 2,121-2,129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson