Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat Harman defends Bush (program essential to security, disclosure damaged intelligence)
NewsBusters ^ | December 21, 2005 | Brent Baker

Posted on 12/21/2005 7:45:35 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares

Though Bob Schieffer introduced Wednesday's CBS Evening News by using loaded language as he pointed out how, “to protest the President's decision to continue spying on American citizens, a federal judge took the unprecedented step of resigning from the court that issues warrants in such cases,” an event also highlighted by ABC and NBC, unlike those networks, CBS White House correspondent John Roberts informed viewers how “the President got support today from an unusual quarter: Democrat Jane Harman, a key figure on the House Intelligence Committee.” He highlighted how she asserted that “I believe the program is essential to U.S. national security” and, in a slam at the leaker and the New York Times, that the “disclosure has damaged critical intelligence capabilities.” Schieffer, however, remained most interested in the resignation. After Roberts wrapped up his story, Schieffer marveled to him: “I want to go back to this federal judge resigning. I must say in all my years in the news business, I've never heard of a federal judge resigning in protest over anything.”

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: harman; intelligence; patriotleak; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Had to pinch myself! A democrat defending Bush! There are a handful out there.
1 posted on 12/21/2005 7:45:35 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Especially THAT Democrat. She always seems very much in line with the talking points of the day. Maybe a moment of honesty or conscience overcame her, who knows?!


2 posted on 12/21/2005 7:48:02 PM PST by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
Maybe a moment of honesty or conscience overcame her, who knows?!

Or does she need to take a position like this to 'maintain her political viability' with the folks at home (sorry to be so cynical)?

3 posted on 12/21/2005 7:50:01 PM PST by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Every so often, Jane gets it right. But, let the Rats make this a really big deal. The more they blab, the stupider they sound and, they aren`t going to gain a single vote. Once again, they`re preaching to the choir.
4 posted on 12/21/2005 7:50:33 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Jane Harman is one of the few Dems in the House that seems to put our country before the RATS agendas. She's from California too, hard to believe.


5 posted on 12/21/2005 7:51:21 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Though Bob Schieffer introduced Wednesday's CBS Evening News by using loaded language

How ironic his initials are B.S.

6 posted on 12/21/2005 7:53:54 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Luke 2 : 8-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

When I heard that Harmon did the right thing, I thought, guess she will be killed by the dems. like any other democrat that does not vote the party line.
It seems that the most we can get are two democrats voting with the republicans, but our side.............EGAD! maybe they can be replaced in 2006.


7 posted on 12/21/2005 7:54:06 PM PST by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Another surprise today someone posted...........

John Schmidt served under President Clinton from 1994 to 1997 as the associate attorney general of the United States.

http://tinyurl.com/8q8mt

Excerpt........

President had legal authority to OK taps

By John Schmidt
Published December 21, 2005

President Bush's post- Sept. 11, 2001, authorization to the National Security Agency to carry out electronic surveillance into private phone calls and e-mails is consistent with court decisions and with the positions of the Justice Department under prior presidents.

The president authorized the NSA program in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America. An identifiable group, Al Qaeda, was responsible and believed to be planning future attacks in the United States. Electronic surveillance of communications to or from those who might plausibly be members of or in contact with Al Qaeda was probably the only means of obtaining information about what its members were planning next. No one except the president and the few officials with access to the NSA program can know how valuable such surveillance has been in protecting the nation.

In the Supreme Court's 1972 Keith decision holding that the president does not have inherent authority to order wiretapping without warrants to combat domestic threats, the court said explicitly that it was not questioning the president's authority to take such action in response to threats from abroad.

Four federal courts of appeal subsequently faced the issue squarely and held that the president has inherent authority to authorize wiretapping for foreign intelligence purposes without judicial warrant.


8 posted on 12/21/2005 7:54:23 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Anti-Christmas votes Last week, the House of Representatives passed a resolution to protect the symbols and traditions of Christmas. The vote was 401-22 in favor of the resolution (5 voted "present"); below are the representatives that voted "nay."

=snip=

Jane Harman (D-CA)

Too bad she's a bigot siding with the most radical leftist anti-Christians.


9 posted on 12/21/2005 7:55:19 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Harmon has always been pretty strong on National Defense.
10 posted on 12/21/2005 7:55:35 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

She'll get little coverage, and with Republicans not using vital info such as Carter, Reagan, and Clinton's exec orders on nonwarranted searches and Gorelicks Senate Intelligence Committee Testimony.

Republicans don't even put out information that help their own cause to beat the Democrats, real dumb asses


11 posted on 12/21/2005 7:55:41 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bybybill

They are preaching to the billionaires who fund their party. This is about money, not votes. It takes a lot of "walking around money" to deliver Illinois and Pennsylvania.


12 posted on 12/21/2005 7:57:31 PM PST by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

Cross her off the leak suspect list.


13 posted on 12/21/2005 8:01:45 PM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

bttt


14 posted on 12/21/2005 8:04:15 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Maybe thats what she wants you to think.


15 posted on 12/21/2005 8:07:43 PM PST by babydoll22 (If you stop growing as a person you live in your own private hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

There are probably 3 democrats with the intelligence to understand what this whole thing means. I think Harmon knows how serious it is and that the leaker WILL be caught and there will be some serious ramifictions. I'm talking jail time here folks, and it's more than likely someone on one of these committees who did the leaking.


16 posted on 12/21/2005 8:15:13 PM PST by McGavin999 (If Intelligence Agencies can't find leakers, how can we expect them to find terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

$$$$, the raising of it, was what the vote on ANWR was all about. The wackos lie about it, and their dumber than dirt true believers send the money. But, once we can get in to ANWR, drill, and the Sun stays in the sky, the issue is over and won`t raise a dime.


17 posted on 12/21/2005 8:16:49 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Harman represents a district with a lot of defense and space industry engineers and such living in it. But she has always been tough on defense and foreign policy matters, and need not now since the district was gerrymandered to make it unmarginal. So chalk it up to actual conviction.


18 posted on 12/21/2005 8:20:17 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Thanks for this post. It does a better job of explaining this subject than most.


19 posted on 12/21/2005 8:26:44 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
Schieffer marveled to him: “I want to go back to this federal judge resigning. I must say in all my years in the news business, I've never heard of a federal judge resigning in protest over anything.”

There was a time that although I figured that although Shieffer was clearly a loyal Democrat, I could give him the benefit of the doubt that he was simply an "old fashioned" Democrat and maybe even a straight shooter.

Turns out Shieffer's a complete scumbag and a liar - - no better than Rather.

The corrupt, Clinton appointed Judge Robertson resigned "without providing an explanation".
Schieffer's assertion that Robertson resigned "in protest" is pure speculation based on the following "scoop" from the Washington Post:

Two associates familiar with his decision said yesterday that Robertson privately expressed deep concern that the warrantless surveillance program authorized by the president in 2001 was legally questionable and may have tainted the FISA court's work.

Notice all the weasel words in the "report"? In fact, the more likely scenario is that Robertson was nailed as a leaker and told to resign. Imagine the pinched look on that scumbag Shieffer's face when his newsroom handlers tell him he has to report THAT little item whether he wants to or not.

20 posted on 12/21/2005 8:28:22 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson