Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You choose: Civil liberties or safety? by James P. Pinkerton
Newsday ^ | December 29, 2005 | James P. Pinkerton

Posted on 12/29/2005 9:01:59 AM PST by Nicholas Conradin

This will be remembered as the year in which mass surveillance became normal, even popular. Revelations about the Bush administration's domestic eavesdropping rocked the civil liberties establishment, but the country as a whole didn't seem upset. Instead, the American people, mindful of the possible danger that we face, seem happy enough that Uncle Sam is taking steps to keep up with the challenges created by new technology. Ask yourself: Do you think it's a bad idea for the feds, as U.S. News & World Report mentioned, to monitor Islamic sites inside the United States for any possible suspicious radiation leaks?

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: homelandsecurity; patriotleak; pinkerton; spying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-229 next last
To: Steel Wolf

Internet message boards tend to accentuate that, don't they? And politics (sound bites) in general. Oh well . . .


61 posted on 12/29/2005 10:04:28 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Nicholas Conradin
You choose: Civil liberties or safety? by James P. Pinkerton

A number of years ago, there was a book titled Cultural Literacy. It summarized, more or less, knowledge assumed to be common among our American culture. Things and concepts assumed to be common knowledge, in both senses of the word.

Among these was the concept of a "false dichotomy"

False dichotomies have been the staple diet of the losers, the "Progressives", the Socialists, the "Democrats", and here we have an all time classic.
As many Freepers will probably agree, my Civil Liberties do not feel threatened in any way, and no amount of goading by the clueless is likely to change that. On the other hand, my Civil Liberties are being shredded under the guise of "Hate Crimes" and other "Thought Crimes".

This threat is not only a lot more serious, but more real, palpable and pervasive. There is an ongoing frenzy of laws being passed that are blatant attacks on Civil Liberties, with (hate crimes) or without (second-hand smoke)scientific or legal justification.

62 posted on 12/29/2005 10:04:42 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
If you are interested in the NSA, there are several books available on the agency.

My original statement was that I dont feel like my civil rights have been violated by the knowledge that the NSA is tapping comm between americans and known terrorists if prior rulings have allowed for it in time of war.

What does that have to do with what little I know of the NSA's activities in the late 1960's? I guess I found it a tad odd and inappropriate for you to leap into some dark description of what they do in relation to my original statement.

63 posted on 12/29/2005 10:04:44 AM PST by smith288 (Peace at all cost makes for tyranny free of charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I used to work for the NSA. What you don't know is amazing.

Scariest thing I've read in a long time.

There is increasing evidence (as a result of treason) that the NSA, FBI, CIA does not exclusively employ the best mentally and emotionally balanced from among our population.

64 posted on 12/29/2005 10:10:08 AM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

What good would qualms do? If you don't tell them the truth, you go to jail.


65 posted on 12/29/2005 10:24:39 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mylife

You didn't know that the OANG, is spoofing that address?


66 posted on 12/29/2005 10:27:03 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Nope! L0L


67 posted on 12/29/2005 10:30:34 AM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Nicholas Conradin

Constitutionally Gauranteed Rights over "Safety" any day of the week.

The Constitution is NOT negotiable under any circumstance.


68 posted on 12/29/2005 10:32:59 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (Uncommon Valor was a common Virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

In two cases, The Roman Reublic became the Roman Empire, the United States won the Civil War, and any changes for the worse resulted from the democratic political process.

And what became of them is irrelevant to the question. The historical reality is that faced with civil liberties, and no sense of security, or security and impaired civil liberties, people take security every time.


69 posted on 12/29/2005 10:54:21 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Nicholas Conradin

False "choice". Nonsense title.


70 posted on 12/29/2005 10:56:18 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
Oh, I hardly think Bush cares one iota about my phone calls asking Mr. M to pick up a gallon of milk or the kids asking me to pick the up after practice.

Do you think the forth amendment is important?

71 posted on 12/29/2005 10:58:06 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

are saying that almost every type of Comm is monitored?


72 posted on 12/29/2005 10:58:57 AM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
We "give up" freedom by having laws in the first place, or by empowering police at all.

Incorrect.

73 posted on 12/29/2005 10:58:59 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

I may or may not have screwed up the semantics but you understand my larger point. "Freedom" vs "security" is not a binary decision, it's largely a balance. Thanks for spurring me to clarify.


74 posted on 12/29/2005 11:04:58 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
We couldn't have a society at all with total anarchy.

Who has proposed such a thing?


75 posted on 12/29/2005 11:05:08 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

I always liked that film! Thanks for reminder - I might watch it this weekend.

Have a nice day.

:)


76 posted on 12/29/2005 11:08:31 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
I always see this as not an "either/or" chioice, but a balance. We "give up" freedom by having laws in the first place, or by empowering police at all. We couldn't have a society at all with total anarchy. It's a question of how much liberty, how much security.

Well said. Our Constitution is not a libertarian document.

77 posted on 12/29/2005 11:11:21 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

You too.


78 posted on 12/29/2005 11:12:19 AM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

thanks


79 posted on 12/29/2005 11:13:19 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Nicholas Conradin

This will be remembered as the year in which mass surveillance became normal, even popular

Bullsplatter

This is the year that the New York Times pushed the issue with treasonous acts in order to try and impeach a president who won't buckle to their socialist veiws and agendas.


80 posted on 12/29/2005 11:13:26 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson