Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Clinton Says Lack of Body Armor is 'Unforgivable' (Barf Alert)
ABC News ^ | Jan. 10, 2006

Posted on 01/10/2006 7:30:11 AM PST by Kaslin

She Has Called for an Investigation Into Why Soldiers Are Not Fully Protected

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called the Bush administration "incompetent" when it came to protecting the troops in combat and called the lack of adequate body armor for soldiers and Marines "unforgivable."

So far in Iraq, more than 2,100 American troops have been killed. Critics like Clinton, D-N.Y., say that many of these deaths are the result of inadequate body armor. A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders — areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

"We perhaps could have avoided so many of these fatalities with the right body armor," said Clinton, who recently wrote letters to Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services Committee; Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee; and Francis J. Harvey, secretary of the Army, calling for an investigation into why troops were not being protected.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; airhead; criminal; douche; hidabeast; hillary; hitlery; idiot; mobility
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Condor51

Senator Clinton, all of a sudden, is an expert on all thing military? Baloney.

Meanwhile, Senator Warner is turning into a real RINO. What's the matter with him?


41 posted on 01/10/2006 8:14:21 AM PST by RexBeach ("There is no susbstitute for victory." -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
42 posted on 01/10/2006 8:14:58 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Was Vince Foster wearing his body armor?
43 posted on 01/10/2006 8:15:03 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Journalists just don't understand that soldiers don't look at things the way they do. They certainly don't like to be portrayed as victims, that no amount of protection will ever be enough. To be more effective, a new armor should be lighter. I know that Clinton is only spouting and has given no thought to the matter, but if she had she would have remembered the way that armor was developed in the Middle ages. It finally got so heavy that it limited the flexibility of the knight. He could not, for instance, dismount to fight, and if his mount was felled, he himself could not get up unassisted and was easy prey to a churl with a sharp knife or a club.


44 posted on 01/10/2006 8:15:09 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
What 16th century battle was it where France's knights were lured onto a boggy field, their horses couldn't stand and the knights, once unmounted, couldn't move with the weight of their armor and were slaughtered to a man?

I think you are talking about the Battle of Agincourt in 1415.

45 posted on 01/10/2006 8:16:56 AM PST by KarlInOhio (What is the most obscene gesture to a Democrat? An Iraqi voter showing him a stained finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What is that old adage, "you go to war with the previous Presidents army..."

She should be carefull what she wishes for. The investigation would involve her husband.

They were in power for 8 yesrs. Plenty of time to distribute 'better' body armor.


46 posted on 01/10/2006 8:21:31 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Yup, and "Old Crusty" still protects Her Heinous..


47 posted on 01/10/2006 8:23:01 AM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders — areas unprotected by the armor most are issued. "

Do these people even know what a torso is? Most body armor covers below the neck to below the navel. That's the freakin torso.


48 posted on 01/10/2006 8:25:00 AM PST by BadAndy (The DemocRATs are the enemy's most effective weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I can't remember who it was but someone said on FNC yesterday the movability of the soldier in the vest has to be considered. It makes sense to me That women looks like she is exhausted just wearing it. Why would a female need all that Body armour anyway, are we sending them to the front lines now? Have they changed they regulations on MOS's? If so then we are in deeper doodoo than I thought.
49 posted on 01/10/2006 8:25:24 AM PST by ABN 505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called the Bush administration "incompetent" when it came to protecting the troops in combat

Unlike the prior administration's sterling record in protecting troops in combat.

50 posted on 01/10/2006 8:27:23 AM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A--lready
B--een
C--hewed
news

You can always count on ABC to give `Cankles' a soapbox.


51 posted on 01/10/2006 8:29:47 AM PST by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Where would one get the stats on the types of death for the Iraq war ? How many were accidental, choper crashes, road side, etc.


52 posted on 01/10/2006 8:47:03 AM PST by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yeah. A lack of body armor is "unforgivable," but gutting the military and sending soldiers off to Somalia without support isn't.

Sure, Hilly. No one is fooled by your routine.

53 posted on 01/10/2006 8:54:45 AM PST by Reactionary (The Liberal Social Order is a Hedonistic Idiocy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs tiggywinkle
Hillary doesn't have a heart for our military . She could care less about the # of death s. There. Tanx.
54 posted on 01/10/2006 8:55:19 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton called the Bush administration "incompetent" when it came to protecting the troops in combat and called the lack of adequate body armor for soldiers and Marines 'unforgivable.'"

More of the Democratic boilerplate talking point using the word "incompetent" to describe the president by people who have never proven their competence at anything other than division and rank partisanship. This is so tired. They've been employing this word ever since Katrina. Like the lock-step zombies they are, they're all reading off the same script and using the same adjectives. So see-through.

Could it be the result of her husband's slash and burn defense spending that we don't have "adequate" body armor, if indeed that report is even true?? Gee Hillary, being the smartest woman on the planet I'm sure you're an expert on everything from what constitutes proper body armor to the reproductive system of the gnat, but could it POSSIBLY be that if there is a problem with the body armor our troops use that a president, not even the hyper-competent Hillary, could have known it and that's why a president has advisors and the Pentagon has officers and officials to make those determinations??

I didn't realize a president becomes an omniscent god once elected who knows all and can foresee and oversee everything that goes on in the vast federal apparatus, including the military. But then of course Hillary you were already godess-like and omniscent before ever becoming president. But of course that omniscence didn't come into play to keep your husband from slashing defense, and body armor, budgets in the 90s knowing our troops would be short-changed on equipment and training in so doing.


55 posted on 01/10/2006 8:59:09 AM PST by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Does ABC News print Hillary's press releases verbatim?

The troops have body armor, it's inadequate in some respects. Hillary's latest attempt to turn herself into General Patton.


56 posted on 01/10/2006 9:04:22 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

But of course, you're right. :o)


57 posted on 01/10/2006 10:01:22 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Oopps.
13th century, then.

No historian, I.

58 posted on 01/10/2006 11:15:58 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
I'm trying to remember who was President when drastic cuts in the military budget took place. Was it Reagan? No, that's not right. George H.W. Bush? I don't think so. Hmmm--I do not recall.

It was Texas Governor George W. Bush's fault!!!

59 posted on 01/10/2006 12:29:03 PM PST by Zeppelin (Texas Longhorns === National Champions !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A secret Pentagon study of 93 Marines who were killed in Iraq found that 74 died after they were hit by a bullet or shrapnel in the torso or shoulders — areas unprotected by the armor most are issued.

105th Congress 2d Session
Report 105-532
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999
REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 12, 1998

Land warrior

The budget request contained $51.4 million for initial procurement of Land Warrior dismounted combat soldier weapon systems, but no funds were included for all-torso body armor.

In its report on H.R. 1119 (H. Rept. 105-132), the committee noted that the effectiveness of modern all-torso body armor was aptly demonstrated during Operation Provide Hope in Somalia and that subsequent Army studies and analyses indicated more than 50 percent of all life-threatening wounds received in combat could be prevented by using such body armor. The committee believes that the medical expenses and loss of human life that could be avoided by employing this type of armor far outweigh the costs of procuring and fielding it; therefore, the committee recommends $56.4 million, an increase of $5.0 million, for the procurement of all-torso body armor.

60 posted on 01/10/2006 12:45:00 PM PST by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson