Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ROCKEFELLER SEDITION: WHO IS CALLING THE SHOTS?"
Rockefeller memo, Sen. Evan Bayh, FoxNews | 01.14.06 | Mia T

Posted on 01/14/2006 5:42:32 PM PST by Mia T

ROCKEFELLER SEDITION:
WHO IS CALLING THE SHOTS?"

Mia T, 01.14.06 

 

MEMOgate: democrat party treason
Secret Democrat manifesto detailing the undermining of President Bush in wartime
by the seditious misuse of classified intelligence data from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

 

 

Saturday, November 08, 2003


If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin. The ones responsible - be they staff or elected or both - should be dealt with quickly and severely sending a lesson to all that this kind of action will not be tolerated, ignored or excused.

 

Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga.

Raw Data: Dem Memo on Politicizing Intelligence
Fox News | 11-5-03

Wednesday, November 05, 2003

Following is the text of a memo written by a Democrat on the staff of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that suggests how to make the greatest gain off of intelligence data leading to the war against Iraq. The memo was obtained by Fox News.

Transcript of a memo written by a Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee staff suggesting how to make the greatest gain off of intelligence data leading to the war against Iraq.

We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:

1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard. For example, in addition to the president's State of the Union speech, the chairman has agreed to look at the activities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department. The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and co-signs our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. (Note: we can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.)

2) Assiduously prepare Democratic "additional views" to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it. In that regard, we have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims and contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry. The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an independent commission (i.e. the Corzine amendment).

3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation at any time-- but we can only do so once. The best time to do so will probably be next year either:

A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report -- thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public: 1) additional views on the interim report; 2) announcement of our independent investigation; and 3) additional views on the final investigation; or

B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue. We could attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the "use" of intelligence.

In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter foot-dragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman; we have independently submitted written questions to DoD; and we are preparing further independent requests for information.

Summary

Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet, we have an important role to play in the revealing the misleading -- if not flagrantly dishonest methods and motives -- of the senior administration officials who made the case for a unilateral, preemptive war. The approach outline above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives and methods.

A former member of the Clinton administration is being linked to a bombshell Senate Intelligence Committee memo outlining a strategy to use information gathered by the committee to help drive President Bush from office in 2004.

In an editorial Friday, the Wall Street Journal reports:

"[Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-WV] refuses to denounce the memo, which he says was unauthorized and written by staffers. If that's the case, at the very least, some heads ought to roll. A good place to start would be minority staffer Christopher Mellon, who serves as deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence in the Clinton administration."

One of Mellon's former bosses, former first lady Hillary Clinton, has been sharply critical of the Bush administration's policy in Iraq. Last week she accused the White House of trying cover-up battlefield casualties and said Bush's decision to invade Iraq was "the antithesis of the rule of law."

The Journal recommended that, until those responsible for Democrats' decision to politicize intelligence are fired, the Intelligence Committee should be "shut down, cleaned out and reconstituted later, preferably after the next election."

Clinton Appointee Linked to Bombshell Anti-Bush Intel Memo
NewsMax.com ^ | 11/07/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

 

ROCKEFELLER LIKELY NOT MEMOGATE PRIME MOVER
Put Jay Rockefeller & minority staffer and clintonite, Christopher Mellon, under oath
MEMOgate reeks of the clintons

 

by Mia T, 11-10-03

 

"Rockefeller under intense pressure by others...."

(Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN)
commenting on MEMOgate)

e have been arguing on this site that MEMOgate reeks of the clintons, that MEMOgate's prime mover could not have been Jay Rockefeller.

U.S. Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN) confirmed as much this week on the floor of the Senate when he disclosed that Sen. Rockefeller had been "under intense pressure -- intense pressure -- by some others to pursue a much more partisan line of inquiry, to be much more confrontational."

It is critical that Sen. Rockefeller and minority staffer Christopher Mellon, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence in the clinton administration, be put under oath. They must be asked to identify MEMOgate's prime mover(s).

Would they do "a Hubbell," ( "roll over one more time for Hillary")?

I don't think so. Not with the potential downside here.

The American Thinker
Sen. Jay Rockefeller a Target?

 

Macsmind is reporting that Sen. Rockefeller may be the target of investigators examining the leak of classified information on the NSA surveillance program.

I'm trying to confirm this information, but several sources are telling me today that some investigators working on the NSA leak probe believe that Senator Jay Rockefeller may have been a little more than “concerned” about NSA. In fact, he may just be the leaker of the program to the NY Times, and is now being considered a “significant person of interest” in the probe.

What I’m told that investigatiors have locked into is this fact that other pundits have identified, that Senator Rockefeller had stated that he went to to great lengths to lock away his memo of concern (in a safe) so that not even other close members of the Senate knew about it. Yet the NY Times, James Risen in fact revealed the letter’s existance in his initial NSA “book excerpt”. The question being asked is if not even Senator Rockefeller’s closest confidants, staffers, etc, knew of the letter’s existance, how therefore did James Risen of the NY Times know about it?

If this incoming information is correct, it would not be the first time Senator Rockefeller – Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee had been investigated for leaking classified information. In early 2005, the CIA asked the Justice Department to look into whether Democratic Senators Dick Durbin, Jay Rockefeller and Ron Wyden leaked details about a secret “black ops” CIA satellite program in December of 2004. That investigation is still on going, but I hear it may be wrapping up in the affirmative.

Moreover, it may be noted that Senator Rockefeller admitted back in November 2005, that he also made a trip to Syria in 2002 to discuss “The President’s intentions” reference to the upcoming invasion of Iraq. A move which I understand didn’t sit well with administration officials.

Of course Senator Rockefeller is the architect of the current Demorcatic game plan on Iraq as the infamous “Rockefeller Memo” showed.

If this information is acurate, it will also confirm the suspicions voiced here, and here after the NSA story broke that in fact Senator Rockefeller, along with recently ‘resigned” FISA Judge James Robertson – an outspoken critic of the President and the NSA program.

Stay tuned.

Clarice  Feldman   1 09 06





December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; barrettreport; clinton; doj; dojprobe; fisa; hillary; homelandsecurity; hubbell; iraq; jayrockefeller; leaks; looselips; mellon; memogate; nsa; rockefeller; rollover1moretime; sedition; spying; terrorism; terrorists; treason; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

1 posted on 01/14/2006 5:42:35 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Bookmark for later.


2 posted on 01/14/2006 5:44:17 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


3 posted on 01/14/2006 5:47:34 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
ROCKEFELLER SEDITION:

democrat party treason

If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin. The ones responsible - be they staff or elected or both - should be dealt with quickly and severely sending a lesson to all that this kind of action will not be tolerated, ignored or excused. Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga.

Fairly well sums it up. But unlike Zell's November 08, 2003 advice, it has NOT been dealt with, at least not that we can see. Repub need to find their spine and censor this guy, kick him off the intelligence committee and/or expel him from Congress and try him for "the first cousin of treason".

4 posted on 01/14/2006 5:50:00 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: p23185

bump


5 posted on 01/14/2006 5:52:36 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

bump


6 posted on 01/14/2006 5:54:19 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

thx wagglebee :)


7 posted on 01/14/2006 6:00:15 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

bump


8 posted on 01/14/2006 6:01:55 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic

bump


9 posted on 01/14/2006 6:03:07 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T



"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.

But it cannot survive treason from within.



An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known, and he carries his banners openly.

But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely,
his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys,
heard in the very hall of government itself.

For the traitor appears no traitor.



He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims,
and he wears their face and their garments,
and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in hearts of men.




He rots the soul of a nation.

He works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city.

He infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.

A Murderer Is Less To Be Feared."

Cicero, 43 B.C.









From the LA Times article "Democrats' War Opposition Not a United Front ":

"Many Democratic political strategists and foreign policy analysts
have long believed the party can benefit more from criticizing Bush's handling of the war than from specifying an alternative."


PS ~ FYI, in cased any of you missed reading the thread which featured this
U.S.News & World Report article: The (Very) Big Lie ...
(it's a damn fine read!)

10 posted on 01/14/2006 6:03:41 PM PST by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

You've nailed it.
Enemy in our midst bump


11 posted on 01/14/2006 6:08:14 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: UWSrepublican

fyi


13 posted on 01/14/2006 6:10:41 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

BTTT. Exceptionally well done!


14 posted on 01/14/2006 6:13:03 PM PST by twntaipan (Liberals: Eternally stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

pong


15 posted on 01/14/2006 6:15:04 PM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Tongue in cheek.

Nothing here.


16 posted on 01/14/2006 6:19:10 PM PST by stockpirate (John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
An example of "defining deviancy down."--Daniel Patrick Moynihan. American Scholar (Winter 1993)
For more info, see:
Moynihan Myths
Mia T
March 26, 2003

17 posted on 01/14/2006 6:25:30 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan; Zacs Mom

Indeed!


18 posted on 01/14/2006 6:26:36 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

;)


19 posted on 01/14/2006 6:29:24 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

bump


20 posted on 01/14/2006 6:37:55 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

Lock them up!


21 posted on 01/14/2006 6:41:32 PM PST by bmwcyle (As the left takes to the streets the too many lazy Freeper sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: p23185

Repub need to find their spine"

Politicians on both sides do indeed have spines, but they(spines) are designed for slithering along the ground, not standing upright.


22 posted on 01/14/2006 6:51:40 PM PST by philetus (What goes around comes around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; Zacs Mom

Wow! Words fail. The memos and the pictures are beyond belief. The most talented fiction writer would never be able to dream up this stuff.


23 posted on 01/14/2006 7:06:56 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: philetus; p23185
Invertebrates; mediocrities all.
Thomas Sowell has a
good idea.
NANO-PRESIDENT
the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton

by Mia T, 7.31.05

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)



Ian Hunter recently observed that our leaders are shrinking. "From a Churchill (or, for that matter, a Margaret Thatcher) to a [pre-9/11] Tony Blair; from Eisenhower to Clinton; from Diefenbaker to Joe Clark; from Trudeau to Chretien -- we seem destined to be governed by pygmies."

Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy
Mia T, November 1999







ur leaders are inexorably shrinking.  According to current mathematical models, they are shrinking at a rate of 6.7 per linear dimension per election cycle per terrorist attack.  At this rate, most leaders will be nanoleaders by the 2020s.

The leader-shrinkage function is discontinuous for
1992 =< t <= 2000 and continuous for all other t.

The 1990s saw in America a sudden, discontinuous drop in leader size, a drop that retrospectively, post-9/11, has been theorized to be its greatest lower bound.
(Can anything be lower than a clinton?)

"Two for the price of one," the clinton pitch in '92 -- (Did the clintons understand at the time that one was not enough?) -- only made matters worse. Missus clinton in the West Wing actually added to this discontinuous decrease in leader size.

History will record, therefore, that the clintons--the twofer, (1992-2000), were America's first nano-president.

The clintons continue to imperil virtually every sector of society, indeed, continue to imperil America and the world, with their exponentially increasing facility in manipulating electoral/policy matter and energy at ever smaller scales. Their "school uniforms" of the '90s became "nanotech uniforms" today; both are proxies for "fight terrorism," which the clintons have neither the stomach nor the know-how to do.

The twofer construct, transposed to circumvent the 22nd Amendment, is now poised to retake power. A self-replicating, Constitution-specific pathogen, the clinton nano-presidency, post-9/11, is a danger that we cannot -- we must not -- abide.

 

 

 

 

 

Cheap politicians

By Thomas Sowell

Dec 27, 2005

 

I don't make a million dollars a year but I think every member of Congress should be paid at least that much. It's not because those turkeys in Washington deserve it. It's because we deserve a lot better people than we have in Congress.

 The cost of paying every member of Congress a million dollars a year is absolutely trivial compared to the vast amounts of the taxpayers' money wasted by cheap politicians doing things to get themselves re-elected. You could pay every member of Congress a million dollars a year for a century for less money than it costs to run the Department of Agriculture for one year.

 There is no point complaining about the ineptness, deception or corruption of government while refusing to do anything to change the incentives and constraints which lead to ineptness, deception and corruption.

 You are not going to get the most highly skilled or intelligent people in the country, people with real-world experience, while offering them one-tenth or less of what such people can earn in the private sector.

 A professor of economics at a leading university earns more than a member of Congress or a justice of the Supreme Court -- and a surgeon earns at least twice as much as an economics professor, though still only about a tenth of what a successful corporate executive can make.

 How many people in the top layer of their respective professions are going to sacrifice the future of their families -- the ability to give their children the best education, the ability to have something to fall back on in case of illness or tragedy, the ability to retire in comfort and with peace of mind -- in order to go into politics?

 A few people here and there may be willing to make such sacrifices for the good of the country but, by and large, you get what you pay for. What we are getting as cheap politicians are often a disgrace -- and enormously costly as reckless spenders of the taxpayers' money in order to keep themselves getting re-elected.

 Whatever the problems faced by the country, the number one priority of elected officials is to get re-elected. Nothing does that better than handing out money from the public treasury. Cheap politicians are expensive politicians, currently costing the taxpayers more than a trillion dollars a year.

 If you have trouble visualizing what a trillion is, just remember that a trillion seconds ago, no one on this planet could read or write. A trillion seconds is thousands of years. That's the kind of money our cheap politicians are spending in order to keep getting re-elected.

 Since re-election is the key, term limits are effective only in so far as they get rid of re-election. If the limit is three terms, then two of those three terms will be spent trying to get re-elected -- and the third term will be spent trying to get elected to some other office.

 What term limits need to do is make it nearly impossible to spend a whole career in politics. One term per office and some period of years outside of politics before running again would be a good principle.

 Many people today marvel when looking back at the leaders who created the United States of America. Most of the founders of this country had day jobs for years. They were not career politicians.

 George Washington, who took pride in his self-control, lost his temper completely when someone told him that a decision he was going to make could cost him re-election as President. He blew up at the suggestion that he wanted to be President, rather than serving as a duty when he would rather be back home.

 Power is such a dangerous thing that ideally it should be wielded by people who don't want to use power, who would rather be doing something else, but who are willing to serve a certain number of years as a one-time duty, preferably at the end of a career doing something else.

 What about all the experience we would lose? Most of that is experience in creating appearances, posturing, rhetoric, and spin -- in a word, deception. We need leaders with experience in the real world, not experience in the phony world of politics.


 
 

24 posted on 01/14/2006 7:14:25 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Faith

bump


25 posted on 01/14/2006 7:16:52 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

bump!


26 posted on 01/14/2006 7:47:52 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

bump


27 posted on 01/14/2006 7:51:30 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

bump


28 posted on 01/14/2006 7:57:43 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

BTTT


29 posted on 01/14/2006 7:59:00 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

BTTT


30 posted on 01/14/2006 8:05:39 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

bump


31 posted on 01/14/2006 8:06:28 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: UWSrepublican

bump


32 posted on 01/14/2006 8:07:35 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine

bump


33 posted on 01/14/2006 8:08:26 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

BTTT


34 posted on 01/14/2006 8:09:14 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: citizensgratitude

bump


35 posted on 01/14/2006 8:10:42 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Arizona

bump


36 posted on 01/14/2006 8:11:38 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

bump


37 posted on 01/14/2006 8:12:30 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

bump


38 posted on 01/14/2006 8:13:17 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

bump


39 posted on 01/14/2006 8:14:02 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Bump. And kudos to the photo editor.


40 posted on 01/14/2006 8:41:32 PM PST by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

This thread would be a bit more persuasive without the multiple bumps by the author. Something seems a bit odd about it.

Am I missing something here?


41 posted on 01/14/2006 11:05:46 PM PST by Carling (http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscreamaudio141jq.mp3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Carling
This thread would be a bit more persuasive without the multiple bumps by the author. Something seems a bit odd about it.

BUMP

42 posted on 01/14/2006 11:12:00 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"Those
who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."


43 posted on 01/14/2006 11:14:18 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."


44 posted on 01/14/2006 11:15:05 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Carling
MiaT is dreaded by Her Thighness and her minions. Consider Mia the most single-minded-remind-Hillary-why-she-shouldn't run FReeper. Roll with it.

It has and will continue to pay off.

Although you do need a T1 to get down with Mia, granted.

45 posted on 01/14/2006 11:17:42 PM PST by txhurl (Gingrich/North '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Sowell's idea is technically sound but, the "most highly skilled or intelligent people in the country, people with real-world experience" are already the ones pulling the strings.

Pay them a million a year but, also make it legal to tar & feather them and run them out of town on a rail, if they get caught usurping the will of the People.

Make them take responsibility for their own actions.
If they get caught riding a motorcycle without a motorcycle license, they get a ticket,pay the fine(out of their own damn pockets), and get a point on their DMV record.

Hang the traitors, in public.


46 posted on 01/14/2006 11:22:37 PM PST by philetus (What goes around comes around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: txflake

My server is fast enough. It's all good on that front. I just don't get the bizarre visuals and the abstract articles that seem to be plopped in some sort of clumsy order.

Is it performance art? Is that the mood I should be in for Mia T threads?


47 posted on 01/14/2006 11:24:06 PM PST by Carling (http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscreamaudio141jq.mp3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Carling
The bizarre visuals underline the blade-runner-type NON-humanity of the clintons. It's definitely aesthetic.

The Clintons are monsters, and Mia has some CGI monster imaging that she thinks is befitting, and me, I agree. Consider it a cartoon.

48 posted on 01/14/2006 11:37:16 PM PST by txhurl (Gingrich/North '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: txflake

OK

I understand now.


49 posted on 01/14/2006 11:41:24 PM PST by Carling (http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscreamaudio141jq.mp3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia T. Bump.


50 posted on 01/15/2006 3:08:17 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson