Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Moore Statement on Canadian Election
michaelmoore.com ^ | 1/20/06 | michael moore

Posted on 01/20/2006 7:37:06 AM PST by Dane

Michael Moore Statement on Canadian Election Friday, January 20th, 2006

Michael Moore is currently in production on his next movie. As an avid lover of all things Canadian, he has issued the following statement regarding Canada's upcoming election on Monday:

Oh, Canada -- you're not really going to elect a Conservative majority on Monday, are you? That's a joke, right? I know you have a great sense of humor, and certainly a well-developed sense of irony, but this is no longer funny. Maybe it's a new form of Canadian irony -- reverse irony! OK, now I get it.


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 350poundsofpoop; agallonofsyrupplease; atkins; attackoftheslob; barkingmoonbat; bigfatslob; boobblog; breathsmellsofcrap; canada; canadianbacon; canadianelection; cnanda; cnandianelection; commie; diet; dim; dimorat; eatadoughnut; exercise; fat; fatterthanahippo; food; greenparty; grimacespeaks; hippies; hisarteriesarecrying; hollyweird; lardass; loser; michaelmoore; michaelmoron; moonbat; mooreisless; mooron; mypoopcracksbowls; pnutcornreport; pos; socialist; southbeachdiet; terrorsupporters; traitor; ultraslimfast; weightwatchers; windbag
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Dane

After this, anyone whos says Michael Moore was equally hard on Clinton for the Serbia bombing is full of crap.


41 posted on 01/20/2006 9:32:15 AM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37; fanfan; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; ...
It's typical of the leftist hypocrisy found everywhere that Canada's socialists habitually welcome this fat, lying blowhard with open arms but just let any even vaguely right-of-center American so much as take a fleeting glance North of the border and ....

The essence of being a liberal:
“The absolute conviction that there is one set of rules for you, and another, completely different set of rules for everyone else.” ~ Ann Coulter

... who also knowingly & appropriately wrote:
"Free speech is a one-way ratchet for traitors!"

42 posted on 01/20/2006 10:29:11 AM PST by GMMAC (paraphrasing Parrish: "damned Liberals, I hate those bastards!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dane

That is until France goes conservative as well.


43 posted on 01/20/2006 10:32:22 AM PST by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: doc30

And Andromeda.


44 posted on 01/20/2006 10:37:30 AM PST by Talking_Mouse (Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dane

This fat, smarmy condescending piece of excrement needs to shut his fat cakehole.


45 posted on 01/20/2006 10:40:54 AM PST by Ashamed Canadian (America - please invade us now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
What amazes me is that Michael Moore makes films that are transparently propagandistic, makes assertions that the average high school student should see through, yet the Canadian left seem to see him as a some kind of god. Canadians are obviously suffering from a diminished IQ if they allow themselves to be influenced by Moore.
46 posted on 01/20/2006 3:16:21 PM PST by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: youngtory

Wouldn't re-election of the Liberals mean the end of the Canadian federation?


47 posted on 01/20/2006 3:18:09 PM PST by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

How about North Korea? There is a leftist regime there.


48 posted on 01/20/2006 3:20:02 PM PST by Fair Go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dane

MIke should stick to lying about his ownership of stocks, especially HALLLIBURTON and to deserting Flint MI, once he got rich off them.


49 posted on 01/20/2006 3:24:27 PM PST by jw777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRobb7
His relevancy was sold on Ebay, wasn't it?



No, nobody would come up with the 2 cent minimum bid.
50 posted on 01/20/2006 3:27:01 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

"After this, anyone whos says Michael Moore was equally hard on Clinton for the Serbia bombing is full of crap."

Lest we forget, Michael Moore backed Weaselly Clarke's Presidential bid.

The guy who bombed Serbia. A guy Moore had hitherto called "a butcher."


51 posted on 01/20/2006 3:37:15 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFarmer

"If the conservatives win, will secession rear its head again?"

Absolutely, because the REASON the Conservatives are winning the election, or have a shot at it, is because the Liberals are being decimated in Quebec. But's it's not the Conservatives who are decimating them, nor the NDP, nor the Greens.
It's the Bloc Quebecois, the French separatists.
They're polling at around 50% of the electorate, which is furious at the Liberals for having larded Quebec with bribes to try and prevent another secessionist vote. The Liberals are toast in Quebec. The Conservatives, as the only federalist option to the Liberals that can do anything, is picking up some votes, but there's a terrible tear among the federalists because some really are more leftist than federalist, and this will divide the federalist vote.
Result: the Bloc are going to come in strong. Very strong. The big winner in this election will be the Quebec Separatists.

Now, the current provincial party in Quebec City are the Liberals, but they are dead men walking. Come the next provincial elections, the provincial Parti Quebecois, the provincial version of the French separatists, are going to roar to the fore. The Bloc's sweeping victory will only boost the PQ, no matter who wins the national election, and you will have a strong Bloc Quebecois representing the French separatists in Parliament, and a strong PQ Premier pushing separatistm in Quebec City.

There is nothing the Liberals can do about any of this other than facilitate it by clinging to power. But there is also damned little the Conservatives can really do about it either, especially if they have a minority government.

What Conservatives have to rely upon is splitting the separatist vote between hardcore separatist sovereigntists who want their own country, period, and the more appeasable group of separatists who are willing to remain in Canada if Quebec has internal control over its own affairs, with a massive and permanent abridgment of federal powers there. Think of the relationship of individual sovereign Southern States to the US Confederacy or the original 13 Colonies under the Articles of Confederation and you have an idea of their vision. That group could be persuaded to remain in Canada...maybe...if Canada were radically reconstructed so that the provinces essentially had a veto over federal law.

If I were Harper and determined to keep Canada together, I would take a different tack than he is likely to take. He is likely to try and appease Quebec by deconstructing the Canadian federal government. Now, since that's what the West wants too, that will be what he does. But that's not likely to keep Quebec, because in the end Quebec wants to be its own French country, and this desire is probably as unquenchable as the desire of the Catholics of Ulster to remove that province from the UK and reattach it to Ireland. There is no combination of blandishments that can persuade hard-core nationalist patriots to give up their desire for self-determination.
But I expect Harper to try the devolution route.

If he really wants a better shot at keeping Canada together, he needs to try a different tack: even if he wins a majority he should invite the Bloc into government with the Conservatives, and give the Bloc the very cabinet posts that would make them think they died and went to heaven. Give the Bloc control over immigration (Quebec province already controls its own immigration). Give them control of the Native Affairs portfolio. Give them Culture.

What result? A taste of national power for the separatists - direct French separatist control over the levers of power on those things that they most desire to set their own policies as a foreign nation. It's pretty tough, once you have commanded the world's second-largest nation, to decide that really you just want to rule Alaska instead. Give the Bloc national power and national responsibility for serious posts - the very things they crave control of, and they will neither very greatly screw things up, nor will they want to leave off control. They will be very likely, instead, to start fielding Bloc candidates from the francophones all across Canada, starting especially in New Brunswick, and once the Bloc turned into a national French party, separatism would go by the wayside. They would end up being a more conservative brand of Liberal, because based on a national principle instead of Marxist theory.

The way you keep the French in Canada is by letting their separatists have command of significant parts of Canada.

But that is probably beyond anything that a Conservative can realistically do, so instead the negotiations and battle will be intense, and while Conservatives are probably the better bet to keep Quebec in the country, it's still better than even odds, in my estimation, that Quebec will go at some point.


52 posted on 01/20/2006 3:38:48 PM PST by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: kempo

Problem is Canadians love this guy. There are voters who really do believe everything they hear on TV. Overheard a women at work saying "Ya know what. Harper wants to stop abortion. He will also have soldiers on every street in Canada. Did you know that?"


53 posted on 01/20/2006 7:12:03 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
A brilliant sketch, and probably a better answer than I deserved.

I agree with your assessment. Bumping separatists to National Apparatchnik duty will keep them on the reservation, and they will fight amongst themselves for bits of Federal Pie.

One can only suppose that in the end, the haves and the have-nots will fight over the Canadian carcass, just as they are in the States, while the world gleefully looks on and smiles.
54 posted on 01/20/2006 7:48:53 PM PST by FreedomFarmer (Beyond the sidewalks, past the pavement, in the real America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sam Gamgee

I always believe that deep at heart, mainstream Caanda feels it is smart and believes in realpolitik. I wrote this for another thread:




Paranoia towards the United States is a constant feature in the New Zealand national psyche, and I assume they are probably just as prevalent among Canadians. Many non-leftists New Zealanders sound like Michael Moore when it comes to defence and foreign policies and when it involves the United States.

There is no doubt that a lot of Canadians and New Zealanders believe that their own nations share no strategic affinity with the United States, and keeping neutrality is considered good politics. When an American openly supports a conservative in Canada or NZ, that conservative is automatically categorized as "Washington's spokesperson" and it will become poison. The reason that Michael Moore, Kerry family, or the NYT and Co don't get similar level of scrutiny when they openly support foreign leftist candidates is because the populations know (correctly) that they work against the United States' national interests.

In other words, we have a line of reasoning from mainstream NZ or Canada that:

1) Our (NZ/Canada) national interests do NOT coincide with that of the United States. They are in a war larhely of their own making, but we AREN'T and life goes on for us.

2) Therefore, anyone who moves our nation agreeing with the US's national interests are causing us troubles and dragging us into their conflicts.

3) Since our conservatives are more sympathetic towards the US's national interests, they are to be avoided like plague.




In other words, they are actually conservative in the sense of "attempting to preserve itself from conflicts which they don't believe exist". They are actually more like the US's paleoconservatives or High Tories of pre-WWII Britain (people like Lord Halifax or Neville Chamberlain) than leftists.


55 posted on 01/20/2006 9:04:56 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Not only are his films made in Canada, I think they are produced and funded there by Lions Gate Studios in North Vancouver.


56 posted on 01/21/2006 10:59:24 AM PST by concrete is my business (prepare the sub grade, then select the mix design)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
"you will have a strong Bloc Quebecois representing the French separatists in Parliament, and a strong PQ Premier pushing separatistm in Quebec City."

Have you seen this article?

Heard At Hy's

Thursday, April 14, 2005

Charest To The Senate?

Two beefsteak Tories, one ex-OLO, the other ex-PMO, are slurping martinis and letting their tongues wag ever so gently.

Adscam revelations have made many Conservatives cocky these days, who can blame them. These two lean into their Grey Goose concoctions, whispering over the semi-submerged olives, voices barely audible to all except a nearby few. In public places, of course, there are always a nearby few.

"The wild card will be Charest", coughs OLO, his eyes darting around the bar, wondering who may know he knows what he knows..

PMO is excited, he shifts his weight from foot to foot as he libates himself.

"If this can be pulled off, Harper will be a national hero".

OLO grins.

"The way it will shake out is that Charest's key Quebec organizers will help us during the federal election.

SIDE NOTE: Charest's big guns are helping the Conservatives right now in key ridings

Once we're elected, Charest will be summoned to the Senate, he'll be Speaker, a perfect spot for him."

"Speaker ?", wonders PMO.

"We thought Ambassador to Washington, but it will likely be the Senate. Either Speaker, or Goverment Leader, with a place at the Cabinet table."

"Unbelievable", burps PMO, this from a fella who's been knee-deep in his fair share of Machiavellian escapades in decades past, political corpses littering his trail along the way.

"Charest's got to get out of Quebec", offers OLO, "he's sinking the federalist cause over there, and a lot of people want to see a fresh face to counter Duceppe who everyone knows is dying to take over from Landry at the PQ. He sees himself as Premier, the guy who will lead his flock to the Promised Land."

"Sovereignty", notes PMO.

"The dissolution of Canada as we know it today", confirms OLO.

"And Charest's said OK to all of this ?", asks PMO

OLO shakes his head, then gulps two inches of premium vodka and signals to the bartender for another round.

"He won't even know what's hit him. It will be over before he knows it."

PMO looks off with a wistful gaze ... then the next round of drinks are set up ... and the topic changes to wives and otherwise.

57 posted on 01/21/2006 7:48:08 PM PST by balk (Martin's goin' down, just you wait... (since 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK
Canadian political discourse amounts to whether or not Harper is "scary". God help us all.

And some Canadians want to adopt what socialist New Zealand has in proportional representation. It was voted on in British Columbia and I gave it a thumbs down. Most PR nations are a disaster. Real fee society doesn't operate on the tyranny of the masses.

For any small nation like Canada (and others like Israel struggle with this) we need to strike a fine balance between cooperation and independence. I think a Canadian politician must always assert our people's rights on the world stage but not be belligerent. Unfortunately we have chosen belligerence.
58 posted on 01/21/2006 9:53:49 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Dane

If Michael Moore hates our country so much, he should move to Saudi Arabia and marry his butt since it always walks ten steps behind him.


59 posted on 01/21/2006 9:59:31 PM PST by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I"m surprised that BS hasn't written them a letter as well. What a pompous A$$ to think that he has the right to sway the vote in a country in which he is not a citizen. Oh yeah, he's a liberal he just doesn't get it.

So Micheal, things are not looking too good in the world of politics, Bush and Co are converting the world to his way of thinking. Too bad, so sad. Should we put you on a suicide watch when Chirac goes down the tubes in France?
60 posted on 01/22/2006 2:51:41 PM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked ( God Bless our Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson