Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House refuses to talk about Al Gore’s plan to Wiretap every electronic device in the world
Left Wing Hate Website ^ | 1-19-2005 | Thanatos

Posted on 01/20/2006 2:18:11 PM PST by Thanatos

From today's WhiteHouse press Briefing:

quote:

Q Scott, I have a two-part question. Apparently, no one in the White House will challenge Al Gore with now public information that he led the Clinton administration's Clipper Chip Project back in the 1990s to effectively tap every phone, fax machine and computer in the country. And my question: Isn't that worth pointing out to the American people, after he accused President Bush of breaking the law and violating the Constitution by --

MR. McCLELLAN: I think you just did. This is an administration that is forward-looking, Les. We're focused on the priorities of the American people.

Q Well, how about Gore? You mean you're going to say nothing about Gore and the clipper chip project?

MR. McCLELLAN: I think you already have. No, I'm not going to get into that.

:unquote

More reading about the Clinton's Administrations Treason:

Wikipedia Clipper Chip

2001: Clinton Administration Considered Sharing National Security Secrets With China, Syria, Pakistan

2000: Out-sourcing Big Brother

1997-2000 Alamo-Girl's Archives of Clinton's "Rogues Gallery"

Clipper Chip info from the Electronic Privacy Information Center


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: algore; algoreisnotmyprez; antiamericanism; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; clipperchip; doublestandard; lyingliar; nationalsecurity; pajamapeoplerule; partisansmear; partisanwitchhunt; patriotleak; waronerror; whitehouse; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Carling
I was thinking more of a potted plant sitting on the podium.

We need Stick Man for press secretary!

41 posted on 01/20/2006 5:23:07 PM PST by Squeako (ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

McClelland's mother is running as an "independant" in Texas for governor. She is trying to take down the Republican. Maybe it IS a family thing.


42 posted on 01/20/2006 5:26:59 PM PST by packrat35 (The America hating bastards at the NYT must spend their entire life with their heads in the toilet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver

You would think that after five years of 'setting a new tone' the administration would get it. It just ain't gonna happen guys.


43 posted on 01/20/2006 5:27:26 PM PST by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

"West Wing" ratings are cratering, hire C. J. Cregg, or better, her writers off the show. This is getting absurd. Echelon has been in the public since 1988 at the latest. Actually, had Gore not made noise in public about it, Clipper Chip may have quietly become a reality. I strongly suspect other, more troublesome ways have been found to get the same result or the intel people would still be pushing for it. I don't claim to really understand the math, but I'm not willing to put total faith in 128 bit encryption.

My libertarian soul objects, but reality, I have assumed since as early as the drug war runs around the Fourth and Fifth Amendments that any electronic communication could be being overheard. Can't think of much in the way of threats to national security such an effort would have uncovered by listening to me. I guess if I were having an affair with the wife of someone in NSA, I'd stay off the phone about it.

It has always struck me as naive to assume any government with the tech capability to listen would not use it. I guess McClellan is doing what he is told, but Bush really needs to hit back on this.


44 posted on 01/20/2006 6:01:03 PM PST by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

Let's also not forget that, during Clinton's administration (1999), the FDIC tried to start a "Know-Your-Customer" law by which banks would be required to profile all their customers' checkwriting, deposit and withdrawal patterns without so much as any suspicion of criminal activity by the customer.


45 posted on 01/21/2006 8:29:48 AM PST by NRA1995 (GOOOOOOO STEELERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thanatos

Link to Cato Institute's write-up of the 1999 proposed "Know-Your-Customer" law.

http://www.cato.org/dailys/02-04-99.html


46 posted on 01/21/2006 8:31:48 AM PST by NRA1995 (GOOOOOOO STEELERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson