Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buchanan defends foreign aid – for Hamas
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 02/01/2006 | Patrick Buchanan

Posted on 02/01/2006 10:09:49 AM PST by SirLinksalot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281 next last
To: SirLinksalot

What a hideous bigot.


61 posted on 02/01/2006 10:49:30 AM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmileo
Pat is an antisemitic bore. His attack on the so called Neo-Cons is based on the fact that most of them are of Jewish heritage and they have more influence than he ever had since Nixon left office.

If Israel were destroyed and the 5.5 million Jews there killed, this would break the back of Jewish Conservatives because they'd be so demoralized by the slaughter. It might leave an opening for Pat and his Paleo gang to move in the vacum and regain the influence they lost during the Reagan administration and the Mel Bradford fiasco.

There may be method to Pat's madness afterall.

62 posted on 02/01/2006 10:50:15 AM PST by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus

Pat's reasoning is appealing for sure. We have been supporting elections in an area that is controlled by a series of theocracies that have contolled the lives of these people for hundreds of years. The political structure in these Islamic countries has been established in order to facilitate control by the religious powers.

We have been successful in overturning dictators/political leaders such as Saddam. Essentially, he was a secular leader. However, how much luck have we really had limiting the control and influence of the religious leaders. Almost none. Take Al Sadr in Iraq. This man was leading a revolt! He was directly responsible for loss of American and Iraqi lives at the hands of terrorists. But, in the end, he becomes part of the political process. We couldn't take him out.

I guess my point is that it is very risky to try to spread Democracy on the political front without altering the religious impact. And my friends, we haven't found a way to do that. Don't get me wrong - I think it's great that these people have embraced their God-given right to self-determination. But, if we want these people to not support terrorists, we have to find a way to overcome the impact of these religious leaders.

This is a very hard subject to get your hands on. In the end, I don't know which option is the best to take. Should we just get rid of the bad guys and rely on the hope that the people will make the right decisions, or should we work to change the hearts of the people so that they will get rid of the bad guys on their own.

I don't know which is right. I know that the attack on Iraq was absolutely necessary. We have to have the courage to get rid of killers and butchers like Saddam. But, after that, I don't know what is the best way to help the people set up their political structures.

Any ideas?


63 posted on 02/01/2006 10:52:20 AM PST by lnbchip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lnbchip

With democracy comes responsibility. We have no obligation to send them anything. Let Allah feed them.


64 posted on 02/01/2006 10:53:50 AM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
If we and the Europeans cut off aid, and Israel refuses to remit to the Palestinians the taxes they collect, the Palestinians will be put through hell for voting the wrong way.

Pat, since when do we owe anybody foreign aid?

Cordially,

65 posted on 02/01/2006 10:54:09 AM PST by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
I abhor PB. I think that he is one of the most fear-mongering, defeatist-albatrosses that the Right has around its neck.

But, however much I cannot stand the guy, I do believe he's calling this portion of it correctly:

To advance the end of "tyranny in our world," Bush began to call for elections across the Middle East...If we and the Europeans cut off aid, and Israel refuses to remit to the Palestinians the taxes they collect, the Palestinians will be put through hell [lose their handouts] for voting the wrong way. The Arabs will call us hypocrites who believe in elections only if they produce the results we demand.

This does not mean that I think that we should keep the aid flowing, though. But, when we don't, you know what the Arab reaction will be. Pat may be a kook but on this matter he sees the writing on the wall with more clarity than many of us here are seeing it.

66 posted on 02/01/2006 10:54:19 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (The Far Right and the Far Left both disdain markets. If the Left ever finds God, the GOP is toast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1
I guess Pat is a selective isolationist.

No, he simply hates Israel.

67 posted on 02/01/2006 10:55:48 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Proud to be a cotton-pickin' Republican on the GOP Plantation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Penner
It was hilarious to watch him stumble and bumble about "democracies" in the aftermath of the election.

As always happens in a thread on a Buchanan article...its clear most posters don't read or don't understand the point Buchanan is making. The US already sends billions of dollars in foreign aid to the Palestinians (the wisdom and Constitutionality of that aid...or any foreign aid for that matter...is another matter altogether). Now that Hamas has been chosen by the Palestinians in a democratic election for which the Administration pushed...what happens if we cut foreign aid off? Buchanan believes that:

If we and the Europeans cut off aid, and Israel refuses to remit to the Palestinians the taxes they collect, the Palestinians will be put through hell for voting the wrong way. The Arabs will call us hypocrites who believe in elections only if they produce the results we demand

Is Buchanan wrong? Most posters won't bother answering or even thinking about it...too busy calling Buchanan an "anti-Semite", a "bigot", a "lunatic", etc.

68 posted on 02/01/2006 10:57:36 AM PST by Irontank (Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Sometimes I think Imus is right, Pat had a uncle die in a concentration camp.

He fell out of a gun tower.
69 posted on 02/01/2006 10:57:41 AM PST by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
The Arabs will call us hypocrites who believe in elections only if they produce the results we demand.

Buchanan is precisely correct in this. And once again, he demonstrates his ability to become lost in the forest because all he sees are trees. This quote would be devastatingly accurate if it had been applied as a criticism of the idiotic Bush Doctrine in general. Unfortunately, he uses it as a justification for his anti-Israel stance and the unthinkable act of using American taxpayers' money to fund a degenerate and despicable terrorist entity.

70 posted on 02/01/2006 11:00:36 AM PST by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Mullah Omar says:

"I Like Pat...I kill him last!"

71 posted on 02/01/2006 11:00:47 AM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springman

Go Pat, Go! (preferably a long way away for a very long time)


72 posted on 02/01/2006 11:00:48 AM PST by umgud (uncompassionate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Supporting murderers is worse than being a hypocrite. We don't aupport terrorists or countries that harbor such. The hamasidal maniacs in palestine knew that. They made their choice.


73 posted on 02/01/2006 11:01:24 AM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Just because we support the democratic process doesn't mean we have to neccessarily support the regime that results from that process.


74 posted on 02/01/2006 11:01:33 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot; SJackson; Alouette
Memo to Pat:


75 posted on 02/01/2006 11:02:38 AM PST by Convert from ECUSA (Not a nickel, not a dime, stop sending my tax money to Hamastine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Pat's true colors are showing again.


76 posted on 02/01/2006 11:02:52 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
For it has been Israel's behavior, and uncritical U.S. support for that behavior, that produced this victory for Hamas.

So Israel ISN'T supposed to defend itself Pat you damned Adolf-wannabe? The guy simply CAN'T get through a column without bashing Israel. Oh well, it makes the picture below make more sense....





77 posted on 02/01/2006 11:04:03 AM PST by MikefromOhio (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

I know that there's no way that you were able to see my reply before you began posting yours (given the time/date stamp of yours). I am glad you posted your comment because I know that I (or you) would have taken a lot of flak if it was a lone view. So here's my question to you: are we the only two - of a light handful - whom are replying on this thread?


78 posted on 02/01/2006 11:05:09 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (The Far Right and the Far Left both disdain markets. If the Left ever finds God, the GOP is toast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ExpatGator
Is it bitterness or insanity, or a combination of the two that drives this man?

I think his insanity is selective, therefore, it's bitterness...bitterness that he can't win anything, he doesn't have any influence with large numbers anymore and bitterness that he can't get a gig on Fox News.
79 posted on 02/01/2006 11:05:37 AM PST by MikefromOhio (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Publius Maximus; lnbchip
This is not a if...then construct along the lines of "We endorsed free elections so we must accept the result." The process is a good thing, but actions have consequences. Citizenship (and voting) also entails responsibility. Somebody likened Hamas to the Nazis, above. Hoping to avoid oversimplification, I just note, BOTH won at least one key popular vote. Maybe even for roughly similar reasons. I assume you are not saying we therefore should have accepted everything the Nazis proceeded to do.

In the case of Hamas, they have publicly and loudly proclaimed their desire to see the end of Israel and their support of terrorism. Palestinians elected these jokers in full knowledge. They will undoubtedly reap accordingly. And there is nothing wrong with that.

Frankly, offering Hamas a chance to recant (which wouldn't be worth the breath required to claim it) is probably overly generous. Carpet bombing seems far more appropriate. I see absolutely nothing with condemning the Hamas government nor the Palestinian people suffering for their decision.

80 posted on 02/01/2006 11:06:02 AM PST by DK Zimmerman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson