Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Columbus Man Accused Of Bridge Plot Seeks Evidence Of NSA Spying
NBC 4 Columbus ^ | February 3, 2006

Posted on 02/03/2006 8:23:04 AM PST by flutters

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- A lawyer for an Ohio trucker convicted of plotting to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge has prepared a motion asking a federal judge to throw out the case on the grounds that the government illegally spied on him.

The motion on behalf of Iyman Faris, 36, is among the first challenges to seek evidence of electronic eavesdropping by the National Security Agency, a practice that began after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Attorney David Smith, who is handling Faris' appeal, said he plans to file the motion Friday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va. It will argue that investigators improperly obtained evidence against Faris, and that his defense lawyer at trial was ineffective.

Faris pleaded guilty in 2003 to conspiracy and aiding and abetting terrorism, and was sentenced to 20 years in prison. Prosecutors cited incriminating statements he made under questioning by federal agents.

At his sentencing hearing, prosecutors acknowledged that federal agents were led to Faris by a telephone call intercepted in another investigation.

Critics say the NSA tactics are unconstitutional, noting that the agency uses wiretaps without getting judges to sign warrants. The Bush administration has staunchly defended the practice, saying the agency only monitors calls in which one party is outside the United States and the call is believed to be related to terrorism.

On Tuesday, a civil liberties group sued AT&T Inc. for its alleged role in helping the NSA spy on the phone calls and other communications of U.S. citizens without warrants.

The class-action lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, seeks to stop the surveillance program that started shortly after the 2001 attacks. It also seeks billions of dollars in damages.

The EFF claims the San Antonio-based telecommunications company not only provided direct access to its network that carries voice and data but also to its massive databases of stored telephone and Internet records that are updated constantly.

AT&T has declined to comment on that case.

A lawyer for Ali al-Timimi, an Islamic scholar in northern Virginia convicted of exhorting followers, has said he plans to challenge his case based on NSA involvement. So has an attorney for Adham Amin Hassoun, a Lebanese-born Palestinian who worked as a computer programmer in Broward County, Fla.

Al-Timimi is serving life in prison.

Hassoun is charged along with four others with being part of a North American cell dedicated to supporting violent Muslim extremists worldwide. He is awaiting trial in Miami.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2006 8:23:06 AM PST by flutters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: flutters

I think this is just the first of many more challenges to come.


2 posted on 02/03/2006 8:23:52 AM PST by flutters (God Bless The USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters

The actions of the Dems and their acolytes in the media are going to cause many of these situations, leading to terrorists being set free...but don't you dare question their patriotism!


3 posted on 02/03/2006 8:25:34 AM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
OH please..let this challenge go to the SCOTUS!!! And let ALITO write the majority decision upholding the constitutionality of the NSA program.

The get some popcorn and watch the Lefts heads explode.

4 posted on 02/03/2006 8:26:22 AM PST by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
A lawyer for an Ohio trucker convicted of plotting to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge has prepared a motion asking a federal judge to throw out the case on the grounds that the government illegally spied on him.

He should be given two options: 1) Be tried using this evidence against him and ignoring the legality of the wiretapping, or 2) Be shot immediately as an enemy saboteur!

5 posted on 02/03/2006 8:27:30 AM PST by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
The motion on behalf of Iyman Faris, 36, is among the first challenges to seek evidence of electronic eavesdropping by the National Security Agency

The defendant can call Schumer, Biden, Kerry, Kennedy, or any of the other left-wingers as witnesses. Any of them would be happy to sing his own version of "I Love Faris."

6 posted on 02/03/2006 8:27:49 AM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters

Whine, the Government found out I was going to blow up a bridge and arrested me, so I will sue them for stopping me.

How dare the Government stop me from doing what I wanted to do.


7 posted on 02/03/2006 8:28:27 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (“Don't approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the rear, or a Fool from any side.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

So, this proves that the spying actually IS WORKING!!! Somehow, I don't see the media giving this case much coverage...


8 posted on 02/03/2006 8:30:08 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: flutters

He looks just like Freddie Fender - always wondered what happened to him !!!!!


9 posted on 02/03/2006 8:31:07 AM PST by finallyatexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters

I have great sympathy for these terrorists..I mean..spying on possible terrorists..is this the country they have come to terrorize??


10 posted on 02/03/2006 8:32:04 AM PST by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight

Let me get this straight...They are permitted to question the war (freedom of speech) but I am not permitted to question their patriotism?

If a criminal is guilty of a crime, the process of gathering evidence does not change the guilt or innocence. If the evidence was illegally obtained, then the person who obtained it should be prosecuted for his/her crime. It should have absolutely no bearing on the guilt of the criminal. This is one of the major faults of our current legal system.

We are WAY too concerned about protecting the "rights" of the guilty and not concerned enough about protecting the rights of the victims. In this case that includes the law-abiding citizens of the USA whose civil rights are infringed every day when they are forced to modify their behavior to accomodate criminals. That includes airline checks, fear of walking alone at night or in certain neighborhoods, reluctance to visit particular cities...


11 posted on 02/03/2006 8:33:20 AM PST by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: flutters

The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff ... so, HE needs to prove it. And that's not very likely.


12 posted on 02/03/2006 8:34:50 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally

That's correct, sir. Their "patriotism" is beyond question...just ask them, they'll let you know.


13 posted on 02/03/2006 8:36:12 AM PST by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flutters

Mr. Faris, Freddy Fender called. He wants his look back.

14 posted on 02/03/2006 8:36:39 AM PST by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
This is great. Terrorist stopped by NSA wiretaps, appeals to courts, D's put between rock and hard place, W gets to stick it in their face. Only concern is 6 Circuit could be goofy, SCOTUS likely to side with government making D's look like A-holes again.
15 posted on 02/03/2006 8:40:06 AM PST by don'tbedenied ( D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters
At his sentencing hearing, prosecutors acknowledged that federal agents were led to Faris by a telephone call intercepted in another investigation.

It will be a big letdown if that intercept wasn't part of an "unconstitutional" NSA program but was actually authorized by a court order. All he'll have left is the ever-reliable "my first lawyer was an idiot" argument.

16 posted on 02/03/2006 8:40:07 AM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flutters

I'm so glad we treat terrorism as a police matter for the courts. Now we get to spend tons of money keeping these people locked up.


17 posted on 02/03/2006 8:40:16 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

"Lyman Farris' Day Off"
"Attorney David Smith", no wonder so many people hate lawyers!


18 posted on 02/03/2006 8:46:15 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Yep, it's working and the Prez mentioned that it had stopped some attacks, during his SOTU speech. The MSM pointed out how he defiantly defended the plan, but tended to omit the part that pointed out it has already had some successes in stopping the bad guys.


19 posted on 02/03/2006 8:48:49 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: flutters

The feds better mover RIGHT NOW and start arresting, charging, trying and convicting people for TREASON. I suggest they start by raiding the NY Times and Wash Post newsrooms.


20 posted on 02/03/2006 8:56:44 AM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson