Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP's 'anger' strategy has Dems defensive
modbee ^ | 2-8-06

Posted on 02/08/2006 12:15:49 PM PST by LouAvul

NEW YORK - The Republican national chairman created a furor this week when he suggested Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is too "angry" to win the White House in 2008. And to hear Republicans tell it, Clinton is just one of many Democrats with an anger management problem.

snip

In recent months, GOP operatives and officeholders have cast the Democrats as the anger party, long on emotion and short on ideas. Analysts say the strategy has been effective, trivializing Democrats' differences with the GOP as temperamental rather than substantive.

"Angry people are not nice people. They are people to stay away from. They explode now and then," said George Lakoff, a linguistics professor at the University of California at Berkeley. His book "Don't Think of an Elephant" has become something of a Bible for Democrats trying to improve their communication with voters.

Political history is dotted with failed presidential candidates perceived by the voters as too angry - think of Howard Dean's famous scream in 2004, or Bob Dole admonishing George H.W. Bush in 1988 to "stop lying about my record." Both parties' most revered figures in recent years, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, projected optimism and hope.

The latest example of the anger strategy came Sunday, when Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman said on ABC that Clinton "seems to have a lot of anger." He cited comments she made in Harlem on Martin Luther King Day in which she likened the Republican-led House to a "plantation" and called the Bush administration "one of the worst" in history.

snip

Some Democrats, in fact, complained that Clinton doesn't get angry enough. Some also denounced Mehlman as mean-spirited, and smelled more than a whiff of sexism in his remarks.

"It's the stereotype of the crone - angry, nasty, but powerful," Lakoff said.

(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: angrydems; hillary2008; mehlman; rnc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-99 next last
Some Democrats, in fact, complained that Clinton doesn't get angry enough.

Uh, yeah. That's what Lt. Col Robert Patterson said in his book, Dereliction of Duty

(Sarcasm = off)

1 posted on 02/08/2006 12:15:50 PM PST by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

It's no sterotype, she is a crone.


2 posted on 02/08/2006 12:17:32 PM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Hillarys anger will turn to smiles when she frog marches her detractors into the death camps.


3 posted on 02/08/2006 12:17:52 PM PST by samadams2000 (Remember our Founding Fathers were REAL men- Unlike today's Rinos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Come on, Hillary! Get mad! You're going to lose anyway, so you might as well tell us what you really think of us, in your best lamp-throwing style.


4 posted on 02/08/2006 12:20:43 PM PST by American Quilter (The worst egoist is the person to whom it's never occurred that she might be one. - Freud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

The cocaine and pot use of her blackpanther terrorism groupi days would show better if she did not have so much plastic surgery. Liposuction has also helped apparently... both Clintons, by the way.


5 posted on 02/08/2006 12:22:16 PM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

I think this is going to be real fun to watch!


6 posted on 02/08/2006 12:23:04 PM PST by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Boy..this is gonna make them angry....lol


7 posted on 02/08/2006 12:23:37 PM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
You can always tell when you've scored against a Democrat. Just listen to the volume of the screeching.

Good shooting, Karl and Ken.

8 posted on 02/08/2006 12:23:53 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Analysts say the strategy has been effective, trivializing Democrats' differences with the GOP as temperamental rather than substantive.

It's effective because it's true, elegantly simple, and easy to understand.

9 posted on 02/08/2006 12:28:08 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
His book "Don't Think of an Elephant" has become something of a Bible for Democrats trying to improve their communication with voters.

Maybe The Swimmer and Park Avenue Howard should have their aides read this to them. They are practically incoherent.

10 posted on 02/08/2006 12:28:29 PM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Some Democrats, in fact, complained that Clinton doesn't get angry enough.

How they can watch this woman when she's in one of her full-out, red-faced screeching tirades, and then say she's "not angry enough", just boggles the mind. The uproar Mehlman's remarks has caused is very telling about how the Dims really see her performance on the stump.

11 posted on 02/08/2006 12:29:11 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Some also denounced Mehlman as mean-spirited, and smelled more than a whiff of sexism in his remarks. "It's the stereotype of the crone - angry, nasty, but powerful," Lakoff said.

Was Lakoff angry when he made this complaint?

If he automatically associates anger with women, that says more about him than it does about Mehlman's remarks.

In fact, "angry" and "nasty" are well deserved stereotypes and accurate descriptions of the most visible Democratic Party leaders and front-runners, regardless of the specific gender involved.

12 posted on 02/08/2006 12:31:04 PM PST by Maceman (Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
"It's no ster[e]otype, she is a crone."
Nah. A hag.
13 posted on 02/08/2006 12:31:15 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kjo
As far as I can see Mehlman hit the nail right on the head. I can't figure out why she doesn't have ulcers the size of grapefruits. LOL. Amen.
14 posted on 02/08/2006 12:31:53 PM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

"I'm not angry,I"m not,really,I'm not...really,I'm not

15 posted on 02/08/2006 12:32:34 PM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

16 posted on 02/08/2006 12:32:57 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Cicero
Analysts say the strategy has been effective, trivializing Democrats' differences with the GOP as temperamental rather than substantive.

If they want "substantive", then maybe the Dims need to offer something more substantive than, "Bush sucks, America sucks, and we really really really really really really really really hate Republicans!"

18 posted on 02/08/2006 12:33:29 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I just wish she (Hillary) and the Rats in particular would get angry at the enemy for a change. The enemy is not the Republicans, their fellow citizens, but the Islamacist fanatics would have telegraphed their intentions for crying out loud. They want to DESTROY US.How much more plain can they make it?
As for Hillary allow me to tell my Hillary story.
In 1993 I hosted an afternoon talk show on a top 20 market, 50,000 watt radio station in the midwest. In September of that year Hillary invited the talk show hosts of America to the WH to spend three days including an address to Congress by her hubbie (very exciting being there even though I couldn't stand the guy) and our last day broadcasting live on the WH lawn with all the other hosts from around the country.
On day one we got cleared into the WH (I was in a group with Alan Colmes and Curtis Sliwa) and ushered to a briefing room where Queen Hillary had just started her presentation. For nearly 30 minutes of her presentation she never once smiled, acted human, or made sustained eye contact with the audience. I thought to myself, what a cold human being. She was followed to the podium by Tipper Gore and then HHS Secretary Donna Shalala. Neither woman holds the same views I do but both of them, while professional, were warm, human, and engaging.
Hillary is angry, she is calculating, profane, and self-absorbed and self-important.


19 posted on 02/08/2006 12:33:58 PM PST by bombthrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

Lakoff is a joke, but I'm glad the Dems are listening to him. He is just telling them what they want to hear, namely that it the way they frame their message and not the message itself that is the problem. He really thinks the only reason Republicans are winning is because they are better at rhetoric and framing issues. Mehlman is just saying what is obvious to everyone that watches Hillary, or Ted Kennedy or John Kerry or any other Democrat these days. They're all a bunch of petulant, angry foot-stompers with no ideas and no message.


20 posted on 02/08/2006 12:34:01 PM PST by Dems_R_Losers (Only losers boast about how close it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Brilliant move. The first real good counter attack I've seen since nailing Kerry as a flip flopper.


21 posted on 02/08/2006 12:35:54 PM PST by rjp2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

She isn't angry so much as just plain bitchy. And no one likes a woman who is a bitch.


22 posted on 02/08/2006 12:36:24 PM PST by tioga (Speaking out from the god-foresaken frozen tundra of the land of the hildebeast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

Democrats are so *angry* that they can't go to a solemn funeral without attacking Republicans (e.g. Senator Wellstone, Rosa Parks, Coretta Scott King, etc.).

They live and breathe in reactionary anger.

...but apparently they are only mad about being out of power (they're down to a mere 18 Blue States now, and Wisconsin is already threatening to leave that lonely pack even now).

23 posted on 02/08/2006 12:37:36 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

**Clinton is just one of many Democrats with an anger management problem.**

Especially toward Willie! LOL! <sarcasm off


24 posted on 02/08/2006 12:37:36 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Roll the film - there's plenty of it to go around from the Roberts confirmation, Alito's confirmation to the Funerals of Wellstone and King, the hearing and barrage against AG Alberto Gonzales and the senate floor hearings! Democrats ARE angry, sore LOSERS and worse, they are TRAITORS like SEnators Rockefellar, Durbin and Wyden!


25 posted on 02/08/2006 12:37:42 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul; peacebaby
But I thought "Anger" was good!

Opps, that was "Greed is good!"

Damn that Gordon Gekko...

26 posted on 02/08/2006 12:38:19 PM PST by Bender2 (Stop doodling around... Read the first three chapters of my Science Fiction novel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
Come on, Hillary! Get mad! You're going to lose anyway, so you might as well tell us what you really think of us, in your best lamp-throwing style.

Hillary doesn't have the smarts to get angry! She just does and says whatever Billyboy tells her to say.... She's hust another mediocre puppet....

27 posted on 02/08/2006 12:38:20 PM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

People don't mind seeing anger, when that anger is reasonable and controlled and used to appropiately advance a cause or a plan. What they don't like to see is a bunch of unhinged, lunatic ranting and raving and wild-eyed conspiracy crap delivered at full volume by a strutting demagogue.


28 posted on 02/08/2006 12:38:33 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Ken Mehlman said on ABC that Clinton "seems to have a lot of anger.

You would be angry too if you were Hillary and woke up one day and realized that you stand very little chance of winning the presidency.

The rest fo the U.S. ain't as easy as N.Y. and California are for liberals.
29 posted on 02/08/2006 12:40:39 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bombthrower
Hillary is angry, she is calculating, profane, and self-absorbed and self-important.

And that's why I've never seen her as much of a threat to win the Presidency. She is simply a detestable, revolting person whose every word and deed screams "PHONY" from a mile away. Just like John Kerry. The American people do not elect people they don't like to be their President.

30 posted on 02/08/2006 12:45:50 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dead

That's one of the funnier one's I've seen in a while.


31 posted on 02/08/2006 12:46:48 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bombthrower
She was followed to the podium by Tipper Gore and then HHS Secretary Donna Shalala. Neither woman holds the same views I do but both of them, while professional, were warm, human, and engaging.

Hillary is angry, she is calculating, profane, and self-absorbed and self-important.

Very nice first-hand account.

Hillary seems to me to be a very strange woman. From what I've seen of her (very little, to be sure) she seems to have to go to great effort to simulate the behavior and response of a normal human being. Only very rarely does she allow herself to be imaged under other than extremely carefully controlled circumstances. On those rare occaisions in which she looses control of her immediate environment, she often says strange, awkward things. Not to mention her odd facial expressions which, to my way of thinking, betray something very troubling deep inside her.

Ten or twenty years ago, when the MSM was able to shape and control public perception, she would have been a real threat. But with every passing year, the new media grows stronger, and Hillary's chances wane.

(steely)

32 posted on 02/08/2006 12:50:42 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

Let her get angry. Let her scream like a fishwife.

It's very unbecoming. Look where it got Dean... .


33 posted on 02/08/2006 12:50:48 PM PST by peacebaby (I'm not overwhelmed; I'm just the right amount of whelmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: peacebaby

If we keeping teasing the Democ. they will become more angry like a bunch of dogs.


34 posted on 02/08/2006 12:53:18 PM PST by Revererdrv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Sheesh...the one who must not be named...even her smile gives me the creeps, makes my skin crawl. I think Alien looks better.


35 posted on 02/08/2006 12:56:08 PM PST by el_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Revererdrv

They do not like having their cages rattled, for sure.


36 posted on 02/08/2006 12:56:22 PM PST by peacebaby (I'm not overwhelmed; I'm just the right amount of whelmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

"Some also denounced Mehlman as mean-spirited, and smelled more than a whiff of sexism in his remarks. "

Oh, please! Sexism? All rats have anger problems. You can tell because they do nothing but throw temper tantrums.


37 posted on 02/08/2006 12:57:53 PM PST by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Hillary is not sincere. She does not believe what she says, she says what she thinks you want to hear.


38 posted on 02/08/2006 12:59:47 PM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: blitzgig

Wow! They are simply terrible people. The idea of the Clintons back in charge is just scary. I'd have to join Butch and Sundance in Bolivia.


39 posted on 02/08/2006 1:04:13 PM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Republicans get mad when Democrats lie about them; Democrats get angry when Republicans tell the truth about them.
40 posted on 02/08/2006 1:05:12 PM PST by chesley (Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
And it still doesn't trivialize anything. We know what we stand for, and we know what they stand for. If we keep pointing it out, they'll just get angrier, and we can point that out, too.

What fun!!!
41 posted on 02/08/2006 1:06:57 PM PST by chesley (Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

If they just said what they mean and mean what they said, they would communicate with the voters, alright.

Come to think of it, based on the last three elections, the voters seem to have had no trouble understanding them.


42 posted on 02/08/2006 1:12:46 PM PST by chesley (Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gakrak
I can't figure out why she doesn't have ulcers the size of grapefruits. It's 'cause she doesn't keep it all locked up inside her.
43 posted on 02/08/2006 1:14:20 PM PST by chesley (Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
In recent months, GOP operatives and officeholders have cast the Democrats as the anger party, long on emotion and short on ideas

Now I wonder where they got that idea?



44 posted on 02/08/2006 1:17:16 PM PST by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Maybe after she loses in 2008, she can finally divorce Billy and live for a few years before she answers to God for the harm she has wrought on this country.


45 posted on 02/08/2006 1:17:23 PM PST by chesley (Liberals...what's not to loathe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

At least they don't show up at public funerals and spout off...Wait a minute...


46 posted on 02/08/2006 1:30:44 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

The beast is easily the most shrill "fish wife" in the Senate.


47 posted on 02/08/2006 1:31:20 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
48 posted on 02/08/2006 2:07:48 PM PST by charrisGOP ("Troubles are often the tools by which God fashions us for better things." --Henry Ward Beecher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chesley
the voters seem to have had no trouble understanding them.

All the ranting, raving, moaning and whining certainly communicated something to me. I think we're due for more of the same this year.

49 posted on 02/08/2006 2:08:05 PM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: charrisGOP

And that could be our next prez? Have mercy!


50 posted on 02/08/2006 2:25:01 PM PST by LouAvul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson