Posted on 02/11/2006 4:47:49 PM PST by Indy Pendance
The Bush administration on Friday proposed the largest Forest Service land sale in decades, listing 309,421 acres in more than 30 states — including nearly 7,500 acres in Washington state.
The plan, which requires congressional approval, would funnel the money from sales to rural counties, in part to replace proposed cutbacks of federal dollars that now help pay for schools and roads.
Most of the Forest Service tracts are small, isolated parcels adjacent to private or state land. Successful bidders could develop, or possibly log, these lands so long as they complied with state and local land-use laws.
"The lands we identified today are isolated and expensive to manage," said Mark Rey, undersecretary of agriculture in a Friday news conference in Washington, D.C. "In some places, they are part of Forest Service ownership more as an accident of history."
In Washington, the potential sale acreage is scattered across the state, including tracts in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area and the Colville, Wenatchee, Olympic, Mount Baker-Snoqualmie, Okanogan and Wenatchee national forests.
One of the largest proposed sales involves seven tracts — totaling more than 1,300 acres — in a remote Sultan River corridor in Snohomish County popular with kayakers.
The land sales are part of President Bush's new budget proposal, which seeks to pare the federal deficit. As part of those cuts, the administration seeks to phase out taxpayer payments to rural timber counties and partial replacement of those dollars with land-sale revenues.
Scrutiny ahead
Forest Service officials say the sales are targeted to raise $800 million over the next five years, and that only about 200,000 of the more than 309,000 acres would likely have to be sold to reach that goal.
Nationwide, the potential sale represents a tiny fraction of the more than 190 million federal acres now managed by the Forest Service. But the plan is certain to face tough scrutiny in Congress.
Conservationists attack the idea of selling public lands to help finance government.
Meanwhile, rural county officials fear swapping taxpayer dollars for slimmer, and more uncertain, revenue generated by land sales. Administration officials project that even if all sales go as planned, rural counties would still wind up, on average, with half as much federal money to fund roads and schools.
"As I look at it, they are holding rural counties hostage and saying if you don't sell off forest lands to the highest bidder, then we are going to cut money for your schools," said Rep. Brian Baird, D-Wash.
Regional forest officials say the sales list was cobbled together over the past month and generally tried to exclude scenic lands that shelter threatened and endangered species.
During the selection process, the list was not widely distributed, even within the agency.
"For many in our agency, today [Friday] is the first day we could see it," said Alan Gibbs, a Puget Sound regional public-affairs official.
Forest Service officials say the tracts have yet to undergo a full review, and some parcels could be dropped from the proposed sale list.
The Sultan River tracts on the west side of the Cascades follow a roughly 8-mile stretch of the drainage — below the Spada Dam — that flows through a rugged canyon area that also includes forest. The area adjoins state lands, and there already is opposition to selling off the acreage.
"We would like to see that land stay in U.S. Forest Service ownership. That is a very rare piece of low-elevation forest that is extremely unique," said Thomas O'Keefe, a regional coordinator with American Whitewater. "The land is one of the most spectacular remote river canyons in the whole region."
Gorge concerns
In the Columbia Gorge region, where more than 500 acres would be put up for sale on the Washington side, Forest Service officials say they have mainly chosen farm parcels and treeless lands on the arid east side.
Al McKee, a Skamania County commissioner, said he could support some land sales within the gorge if that would help spur development and create jobs. But he says federal support for the county, which provides nearly 30 percent of school funding, needs to be maintained at current levels.
If that money fades away, the county will have few options.
"Other counties might be able to transition, but for us, we just kind of drop off a cliff and pick up the pieces," he said.
On the east side of the Cascades, the list includes one forested parcel of 160 acres in the Okanogan forest. But many of the listed parcels are just outside the forest, in the transition zone of pines and chaparral, according to Paul Hart, a spokesman with the Wenatchee National Forest.
The Forest Service will publish a notice in the Federal Register around Feb. 28 requesting public comment. At that time, more detailed maps will be available for all potentially eligible lands.
oooooooooooo!!!!!! I can hardly wait for the Watermelons to start screaming BOO-SSH is EVIL! BOO-SSH is Destroying the environment to please his Fat-Cat buddies!
This could be fun to watch.
It's about time this came up. We can plant more trees. We can use the environment, we just need to take care of it. The EPA is part of the ENEMY WITHIN. SELL this land and let them harvest the trees.
This is awesome. This is exactly why we voted in G.W. Bush. We have extraordinary resources tied up in the stewardship of the Federal Govt.,and it is about time we privatized these. Thank you President Bush.
ping....THIS IS GREAT!
I wish they would sell off the Washington DC mall to developers. Talk about a waste!
'Bout damn time.
120 acres of it is a long tongue extending E-W, and adjoins the south half of my west line. Needless to say, I'll be trying to buy it, just to get possession of the spring that is about 50' on their side of the line.
Even if I had to flip the western most 80, I still want THAT 40.
I doubt my grazing rights lessee would squawk about extra acreage & water for his critters, either.
Next, Chapter Two: The Post Office.
Good luck! I hope you succeed!
Are foreigners allowed to buy these tracts?
Thanks!
How about restricting federal land ownership to ten percent of any given state, plus military bases? Restore the Homestead Act of 1862 (a fine Republican social program--give away free land) or simply give the land to the states in which it lies.
Under the Homestead Act of 1862, which Congress unfortunately repealed, it's 640 acres for $1. Foreigners can receive this "free" land only if they are legal immigrants seeking citizenship.
I wouldn't doubt it.
About time !!!!
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.