Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bugs Could Be Key to Kicking Oil Addiction
AP Biotechnology ^ | Sunday February 12, 1:42 pm ET | Paul Elias,

Posted on 02/12/2006 12:00:24 PM PST by BenLurkin

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- The key to kicking what President Bush calls the nation's oil addiction could very well lie in termite guts, canvas-eating jungle bugs and other microbes genetically engineered to spew enzymes that turn waste into fuel.

It may seem hard to believe that microscopic bugs usually viewed as destructive pests can be so productive. But scientists and several companies are working with the creatures to convert wood, corn stalks and other plant waste into sugars that are easily brewed into ethanol -- essentially 199-proof moonshine that can be used to power automobiles.

Thanks to biotechnology breakthroughs, supporters of alternative energy sources say that after decades of unfulfilled promise and billions in government corn subsidies, energy companies may be able to produce ethanol easily and inexpensively.

"The process is like making grain alcohol, or brewing beer, but on a much bigger scale," said Nathanael Greene, an analyst with the environmental nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council. "The technologies are out there to do this, but we need to convince the public this is real and not just a science project."

Using microbes may even solve a growing dilemma over the current ethanol manufacturing process, which relies almost exclusively on corn kernels and yielded only 4 billion gallons of ethanol last year (compared to the 140 billion gallons of gasoline used in the U.S.). There's growing concern throughout the Midwestern corn belt that the 95 U.S. ethanol plants are increasingly poaching corn meant for the dinner table or livestock feed.

The idea mentioned by Bush during his State of the Union speech -- called "cellulosic ethanol" -- skirts that problem because it makes fuel from farm waste such as straw, corn stalks and other inedible agricultural leftovers. Cellulose is the woody stuff found in branches and stems that makes plants hard.

Breaking cellulose into sugar to spin straw into ethanol has been studied for at least 50 years. But the technological hurdles and costs have been so daunting that most ethanol producers have relied on heavy government subsidies to squeeze fuel from corn.

Researchers are now exploring various ways to exploit microbes, the one-cell creatures that serve as the first link of life's food chain. One company uses the microbe itself to make ethanol. Others are taking the genes that make the waste-to-fuel enzymes and splicing them into common bacteria. What's more, a new breed of "synthetic biologists" are trying to produce the necessary enzymes by creating entirely new life forms through DNA.

Bush's endorsement of the waste-to-energy technology has renewed interest in actually supplanting fossil fuels as a dominant energy source -- a goal long dismissed as pipe dream.

"We have been at this for 25 years and we had hoped to be in commercial production by now," said Jeff Passmore, an executive vice president at ethanol-maker Iogen Inc. "What the president has done is -- perhaps -- put some wind in the sails."

Ottawa-based Iogen is already producing ethanol by exploiting the destructive nature of the fungus Trichoderma reesei, which caused the "jungle rot" of tents and uniforms in the Pacific theater during World War II.

Through a genetic modification known as directed evolution, Iogen has souped up fungus microbes so they spew copious amounts of digestive enzymes to break down straw into sugars. From there, a simple fermentation -- which brewers have been doing for centuries -- turns sugar into alcohol.

Iogen opened a small, $40 million factory in 2004 to show it can produce cellulosic ethanol in commercial quantities. In the last two years, it has produced 65,000 gallons of ethanol that is blended with 85 percent gasoline to fuel about three dozen company and Canadian government vehicles. Oil giant Royal Dutch Shell PLC has invested $40 million for a 30 percent ownership stake in Iogen; Petro-Canada and the Canadian government are also investors.

Now the company is ready to build a $350 million, commercial-scale factory in Canada or Idaho Falls, Idaho, next year if it can secure financing -- long one of the biggest stumbling blocks to bringing the stuff to gas pumps.

While conventional lenders are wary of investing in a new technology, the company is banking on winning a loan from the U.S. Department of Energy. Even under a best-case scenario, Passmore said Iogen won't be producing commercial quantities until 2009.

Other significant hurdles include how to widely distribute the fuel; getting auto manufacturers to make engines that will use it; and persuading gas stations to install ethanol pumps. There's hope that funding shortfalls and the remaining technological problems such as how to ship large amounts of ethanol will be overcome in the next few years.

Despite the challenges, Bush's endorsement and advancements in the field have re-energized alternative energy types.

While no commercial interest has advanced as far as Iogen, other biotech companies are engineering bacteria to spit out similar sugar-converting enzymes, and academics are pursuing more far-out sources.

At the California Institute of Technology, Jared Leadbetter is mining the guts of termites for possible tools to turn wood chips into ethanol. Leadbetter said there are some 200 microbes that live in termite bellies that help the household pest convert wood to energy.

Those microbes or their genetic material can be used to produce ethanol-making enzymes. So scientists at the Energy Department's Joint Genome Institute in Walnut Creek, Calif., are now sequencing the microbe genes in hopes of finding a key to ethanol production.

"We have this idea that microbes are pests," said Leadbetter, who has been studying termite guts for 15 years. "But most microbes are beneficial."


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: ecoping; energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Chanticleer
My understanding is that ethanol made from sources like corn and sugar actually costs more to produce than its worth as fuel.

IIRC, Brazil produces 160,000 NET oil barrel equivalents of ethanol per day from sugar cane and plans to become energy independent mid-2006.

21 posted on 02/12/2006 12:48:36 PM PST by Dark Skies ("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Interesting (seriesly), but can't resist asking if this stuff will work in my flying car??


22 posted on 02/12/2006 12:49:20 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry

The keys to kicking oil addiction are lowering the mass of vehicles per person transported, lowering the number of people transported and the number of miles they travel.




Only if you're a liberal. Otherwise you work on new sources and let the people do whatever they want.


23 posted on 02/12/2006 12:53:34 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

Anytime you can drink your cars fuel life is good.


24 posted on 02/12/2006 12:55:16 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Palpatine

Hunt sum wabbits fowh Jimmwee Ka-tah too.


25 posted on 02/12/2006 12:56:45 PM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

26 posted on 02/12/2006 12:57:46 PM PST by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
There is so much waste material available

*cough*BIGDIG*cough*TeddyKennedy*cough*

27 posted on 02/12/2006 12:58:25 PM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
As I said, I'm no expert. I've hung out on some FR threads where people had some very convincing arguments against ethanol -- as well as quite a few pro-ethanol. They get quite feisty! I used to think it was a no-brainer -- now, I think the issue is more complicated.

But even if alcohol is a great fuel alternative, to produce it more cheaply from secondary sources (corn cobs instead of corn, hay, etc.) would make things even better, wouldn't it?

28 posted on 02/12/2006 12:58:43 PM PST by Chanticleer (May you be gruntled and combobulated in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This is OUTRAGEOUS! These defenseless bugs are kept in tiny cages with no freedom of movement. They are force fed and given hormones to fatten them up.

Fight factory bug farms - buy Free range bug fuel only!

- BIFF (Bug & Insect Freedom Front)

/PETA


29 posted on 02/12/2006 1:00:06 PM PST by Trampled by Lambs (I think, therefor I Zot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chanticleer

And then there's http://dogbegone.com/ for the not so weak of heart.


30 posted on 02/12/2006 1:01:21 PM PST by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

bump


31 posted on 02/12/2006 1:03:09 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: printhead

Was that Bill Murray in the video?


32 posted on 02/12/2006 1:03:20 PM PST by Chanticleer (May you be gruntled and combobulated in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
BUGS!
33 posted on 02/12/2006 1:04:37 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Horror/disaster book out a few years ago about "biologics" that were designed to eat the oil spill residue.

Got out of control/mutated once they were released to clean up an oil spill off of CA's coast, and were found to be able to eat ANY form of rubber/plastic/poly-based organic compound. Windshield wipers, lube oil, rubber seals around airplane windshields, gaskets, pumps, seals, hoses, springs, clamps, ......

So, the nation and world was reduced to mid-1800's technology, since nothing more recent could operate.


34 posted on 02/12/2006 1:08:15 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry

Put a 4x9 sheet of plywood in your Beetle or econo-car, a couple of 100 lb bags of concrete in the trunk, and a few 12 foot long 2x12's tied on top.

And tools.

And a few helpers.


35 posted on 02/12/2006 1:10:19 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
This issue is fascinating from many angles, Environmentalism/Capitalism, Genetically modified organisms/ecology, and evolution/design.

While this is the only line of research that will turn ethanol into a productive alternative to oil, it has real and serious dangers to the environment if done improperly.

This kind of thing has been done before, and the research was stopped for pretty good environmental reasons. This method should be limited to recreating the enzymes and the digestive process, not genetically modifying whole organisms. If this can be done safely, and in commercial quantities, I'm all for it, including government research and funding.

36 posted on 02/12/2006 1:15:23 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chanticleer
My understanding is that ethanol made from sources like corn and sugar actually costs more to produce than its worth as fuel.

This is why companies such as Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill are pushing ethanol fuel so hard :-)

Anti-greedy corporation-masquerading-as-environmentalists Sarcasm Torpedo ARMED. FIRE!!

"This is how Cargill works with customers." [Cue to Animal Planet video of a hungry croc emerging from the river to pull a single zebra out of the herd down for lunch...]

Cheers!

37 posted on 02/12/2006 1:46:01 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Chanticleer
I not a real expert either and I also have noticed some heated arguments before (one has to wonder why we can't capture that heat).

I have been keeping an eye on Brazil and I can't imagine they are going to switch to an ethanol economy if it doesn't have an economic foundation vis-a-vis oil. But what do I know?

38 posted on 02/12/2006 1:50:01 PM PST by Dark Skies ("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ExcursionGuy84
There is so much waste material available *cough*BIGDIG*cough*TeddyKennedy*cough*

Uncle Teddy's girth alone would light Cleveland for a week!

39 posted on 02/12/2006 2:04:29 PM PST by llevrok (Drink your beer, damnit! There are sober people in Africa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Chanticleer; meanie monster; blam; Carry_Okie; ClearCase_guy; cogitator; CollegeRepublican; ...
bug-PING!

FReepmail me to be added or removed to the bug-PING list!

Something smells a little fishy here to me too. Sounds almost like one of those "once in a lifetime" stock opportunities that come through the rax machines daily.

40 posted on 02/12/2006 2:25:14 PM PST by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson