Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Gay wedding' ends up in cells (Muslims get something right for once)
News24 (South Africa) ^ | 12 February 2006 | News24

Posted on 02/12/2006 2:36:44 PM PST by Cornpone

Dubai - A United Arab Emirates court has jailed 12 men who were arrested after being discovered preparing for a gay wedding, but acquitted another 14 defendants, an official said on Sunday.

"Eleven men have confessed to practising homsexuality.

They were sentenced to five years in prison (for homosexuality) and one year for obscenity," said the official.

"Another man was sentenced to one year in prison for obscenity, but was acquitted of homosexuality charges... while 14 others have been released after being found not guilty," he said.

The 26 defendants, including UAE citizens, an Indian and three nationals of neighbouring Arab countries, were arrested in November when police raided a hotel in a desert resort town.

Emirates Today had reported that the Abu Dhabi court had sentenced all 26 men to five years in jail.

It said the men were busted in a hotel "dressed in women's clothes and makeup in preparation for a gay wedding".

The official said the verdict was not final and could go on appeal.

The United States state department had condemned the arrests and called on its close Gulf ally to stop reported plans for a forced hormone treatment on the suspects, which an interior ministry official then denied.

Homosexuality is a serious offence in the Muslim UAE and neighbouring conservative Gulf countries, where offenders could face flogging along with imprisonment, while foreigners could also face expulsion.

Last April, a court in neighbouring Saudi Arabia sentenced two Saudis, one Yemeni and a Jordanian to two years in jail and 2 000 lashes after a police raid on an alleged gay party.

Across the Gulf in non-Arab Iran, repeated sodomy carries the death penalty.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gay; homosexuals; islam; marriage; muslims; samesexmarriage; uae; weddings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: attiladhun2
The libs need to develop rules, like Canasta, regarding trumps. Does Islam trump homosexuality? Feminism? Abortion?
41 posted on 02/12/2006 4:22:02 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BubbaTheRocketScientist

No one has to drive and no one has to have sex. Having an accident while driving has a probability associated with it. Getting infected while sexing has a probability associated with it. You focus on sexing. I focus on driving. You worry about what people do in their beds while I worry about people do in their cars.


42 posted on 02/12/2006 4:25:44 PM PST by chinche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chinche

Repeated bad driving doesn't lead to the development of new strains of antibiotic-resistant bad drivers who can infect and quite possibly kill unknowing good drivers.


43 posted on 02/12/2006 4:29:20 PM PST by BubbaTheRocketScientist (We're from the town with the Super Bowl Team, we cheer the Pittsburgh Steelers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BubbaTheRocketScientist
Repeated bad driving doesn't lead to the development of new strains of antibiotic-resistant bad drivers who can infect and quite possibly kill unknowing good drivers

Very good, although we were originally speaking of crimes, not anitbodies. So...think about what you are saying in the context of all human contact, not just sex. In the name of public health, you are making an argument for the regulation and criminalization of all interactions that might spread disease.

44 posted on 02/12/2006 4:42:11 PM PST by chinche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

They put them in prison? What the? If they are good citizens and this is the only thing that put them in prison, that is horrible and heartbreaking, IMO. Gotta think there are some really dangerous people running free over there that should be taking up tenancy in those cells instead. Whoa.


45 posted on 02/12/2006 4:47:32 PM PST by Floratina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chinche
In the name of public health, you are making an argument for the regulation and criminalization of all interactions that might spread disease.

No, not "all interactions". Just those which provably have a high likelihood of spreading disease. It's the same general principal as that which allows municipalities to require sewer or septic service in new housing developments. Also the reason why we don't let people self-prescribe antibiotics. And the same principle under which we can forcibly commit and medicate TB patients.
46 posted on 02/12/2006 4:48:39 PM PST by BubbaTheRocketScientist (We're from the town with the Super Bowl Team, we cheer the Pittsburgh Steelers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jason_b

Interesting. I did not know that.


47 posted on 02/12/2006 4:51:26 PM PST by Floratina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BubbaTheRocketScientist
You being with:

The United States state department had condemned the arrests and called on its close Gulf ally to stop reported plans for a forced hormone treatment on the suspects.

And as usual, State is choosing the wrong position.

And end up with something feeble:

And the same principle under which we can forcibly commit and medicate TB patients.

So, are you saying that these arrests of homosexuals and forced hormone treatment are like the commitment and medication of TB? The State Department is stupidly advocating something against public health? If so, then that’s the end of the conservation.

48 posted on 02/12/2006 5:02:09 PM PST by chinche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: chinche
If so, then that’s the end of the conservation.

I would define the end of conservatism as when "conservatives" think the State department has a legitimate mission to muck about in the internal affairs of other countries. That sort of Wilsonian foreign policy is directly responsible for the sad state of affairs today.

Libertarian at Home, Authoritarian Abroad? Is that the new party motto?
49 posted on 02/12/2006 5:09:18 PM PST by BubbaTheRocketScientist (We're from the town with the Super Bowl Team, we cheer the Pittsburgh Steelers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BubbaTheRocketScientist
I would define the end of conservatism [sic] as when "conservatives" think the State department has a legitimate mission to muck about in the internal affairs of other countries. That sort of Wilsonian foreign policy is directly responsible for the sad state of affairs today.

Libertarian at Home, Authoritarian Abroad? Is that the new party motto?

I was speaking of the conversation, not conservatism. But now we have gone from defending the arrest and forced hormone treatment of oddly behaving men, to the equation of such things with the commitment and forced treatment of TB carriers, now to a Buchanan-like rant about Wilsonian foreign policy. You are all over the place. So let’s agree to retreat from Iraq, shall we?

50 posted on 02/12/2006 5:21:19 PM PST by chinche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BubbaTheRocketScientist
No, just forms which present a public health threat.

So unprotected sex should be a felony?

51 posted on 02/12/2006 5:29:03 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chinche
Buchanan-like

I can't stand that guy.

So let’s agree to retreat from Iraq, shall we?

Sorry, there's no equivalence there. Let me spell it out: Country which has attacked it's neighbors (our allies) in the past, attempting to manufacture nuclear and biological weapons, and has used chemical weapons repeatedly in the past = valid target for interventionist foreign policy.

Country which wants to (in your view) violate the civil rights of 1% of it's citizens = none of our business.

was speaking of the conversation, not conservatism.

Sorry, I read too fast. Probably a good idea since we're not going to make any progress here.
52 posted on 02/12/2006 5:36:44 PM PST by BubbaTheRocketScientist (We're from the town with the Super Bowl Team, we cheer the Pittsburgh Steelers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BubbaTheRocketScientist
Sorry, I read too fast. Probably a good idea since we're not going to make any progress here

Enough then. You are young here on FR. I am old. I think you should ponder your position on the matter. That's all. Good luck.

53 posted on 02/12/2006 5:42:29 PM PST by chinche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
So unprotected sex should be a felony?

Yeah, great idea! Um, except for the resulting inability of humankind to reproduce under those circumstances.
54 posted on 02/12/2006 5:50:12 PM PST by BubbaTheRocketScientist (We're from the town with the Super Bowl Team, we cheer the Pittsburgh Steelers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
So unprotected sex should be a felony?

I suppose you should say, sex outside of absolutely monogamous marriage (forever) should be a felony.

55 posted on 02/12/2006 5:55:52 PM PST by chinche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: BubbaTheRocketScientist
Yeah, great idea! Um, except for the resulting inability of humankind to reproduce under those circumstances.

No, I agree it's an insane idea, just one of several reasons why I have no idea what you're talking about.

56 posted on 02/12/2006 7:03:21 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Thanks for the source Cornpone.

I am well aware of mooslem attitudes about love and marriage and women because I have known so many over the years.

I have sat across from a mooslem Yemeni woman at a wedding reception and listened to her tell me that she cannot leave her horribly abusive husband because to do so would mean she would never see her children again and she would probably end up disappeared.

This is in the US. This is one of the less troubling stories.


57 posted on 02/12/2006 7:03:59 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2

It may be hard to do it with a Mooslem....but it's done all the time: rape. Especially the rape of non mooslem females.


58 posted on 02/12/2006 7:30:10 PM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
A thief looses a hand, I wonder what these guys will have cut off for this?

Perhaps something will be sewn shut. There's more than one way to skin a cat.

59 posted on 02/12/2006 7:33:35 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jason_b
re: . His take on it was that with all the wars and whatnot the muslims were involved in, many of the men were dying, leaving widows for the few remaining men.)))

(snort) I guess there're a lot of middle-aged widows that these fellows are willing to marry and support. yeah. right. This is a culture that marries off little girls--Anwar Sadat's 12-yr-old daughter, for one.

60 posted on 02/12/2006 7:59:03 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson