Skip to comments.
Open relationships have drawbacks
Badger Herald ^
| 2-14-06
| Darryn Beckstrom
Posted on 02/14/2006 4:35:58 PM PST by SJackson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: SJackson
It is a common occurrence for someone to proclaim this so-called relationship status on Facebook or to engage in a sexual rendezvous with another person while in a supposed relationship.I'm not sure what "Facebook " is, but these behaviors were a "common occurrence" long before it existed!
Oh, and does the writer know that the O'Neills were divorced shortly after publishing the book celebrating the wonders of their "open marriage"?
To: rzeznikj at stout
mark for later read
22
posted on
02/15/2006 6:45:27 AM PST
by
rzeznikj at stout
(This is a darkroom. Keep the door closed or you'll let all the dark out...)
To: Melas
"Biologically speaking, their offspring have a better chance of survival overall if they are of differing paternity."
The stats on abuse of children by other than the birth father would belie your statement. This would also mirror the usual situation in the animal world, where the male often kills the offspring and then impregnates the female in order to assure success of his genetic preservation efforts.
Might I ask where you got data to support your above quoted statement?
23
posted on
02/15/2006 4:58:57 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
To: GladesGuru
The stats on abuse of children by other than the birth father would belie your statement. This would also mirror the usual situation in the animal world, where the male often kills the offspring and then impregnates the female in order to assure success of his genetic preservation efforts That may or may not be true, but in either event, it's not biology. Biologically speaking, a female's genes have a better chance of surviving if she varies the paternity of her offspring. The down and dirty science is simple: Multiple paternity minimizes any chance of unfavorable heterozygous gene pairings.
24
posted on
02/15/2006 6:01:27 PM PST
by
Melas
(What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
To: Melas
"That may or may not be true, but in either event, it's not biology."
I think you may be blurring biology and genetics. An organism is biologically successful if it's offspring reach reproductive age.
Thus the facts about father v. stepfather raise children is biological in that is influences biological success.
One closely related fact may be relevant. While factors like IQ are genetically controlled, merely marrying a high IQ person (assuming one is also high IQ) may, but not necessarily will, produce high IQ children.
That's why is is sometimes called "potluck at the meiotic dance".
Happy biking, by the way.
25
posted on
02/15/2006 7:02:03 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
To: SJackson; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
26
posted on
02/21/2006 7:42:57 PM PST
by
Coleus
(What were Ted Kennedy & his nephew doing on Good Friday, 1991? Getting drunk and raping women)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson