Mid-Morning Friday coffee break required reading:
| Al Gore Personifies Liberal Disloyalty To America Al Gore's recent, outlandish remarks to a Saudi audience not only represent his own scorn for the United States, they are also reflective of this country's liberal establishment. In short, the overriding sentiment of the left towards America is one of complete contempt.... More |
| Prayer - Social, Political...or Spiritual? On the Web site of the Kentucky Council of Churches is a commentary prepared by the KCC executive director, the Rev. Dr. Nancy Jo Kemper, and her note that it has been sent to the Lexington Herald-Leader, a part of the Knight-Ridder chain, for possible publication.... More |
| Spoiled Brat Media The accidental shooting of Harry Whittington, while he was on a hunting trip with Dick Cheney, has nothing to do with government policy or the Vice President's official duties but the mainstream media have gone ballistic over it nevertheless. ... More |
| How Do You Solve a Problem Like...Ann Coulter? The latest Ann Coulter brouhaha is over her crude characterization of Muslims as "ragheads" during an enthusiastically received speech at a Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) on February 10, 2006. "I think our motto should be post-9-11, 'raghead talks tough, raghead faces consequences," Ms. Coulter opined.... More |
| San Francisco Needs to Leave the US The San Francisco Chronicle, one of the left-wing organs that continues to promulgate the anti-war, anti-military, anti-police agenda of the far-Left, has attacked the local SF police with merciless abandon. ... More |
| Olympic Distress Baseball was and is my passion and though there are those who don't believe that absence makes the heart grow fonder, tell it to anyone whose Sunday mornings were spent poring over the weekly statistics printed in glorious linotype.... More |
| ACLU Creating More Mischief Part of the professionalization process is the training of airport security staff in what's been called psychological profiling or behavioral analysis or a number of other terms that all amount to the same thing -- avoiding allegations of racial profiling while at the same time effectively screening out potential terrorists. ... More |
| The False Prophet Mohammed Islam's prophet Mohammed (various spellings are given to his name, some being "Muhammad") was the David Koresh and Jim Jones of his time.... More |
Thank you.
Screw this PC claptrap. I call the islamofacists alot worse than ragheads. They are fetid piles of sh*t who will rot in hell when we put a bullet thru their skulls and they find out that Mohammed was really a lying charaltan and 72 virgins all look like Helen Thomas.
He's right. "Ragehad" is offensive.
I suggest we start calling them "third-world-sh*thole-dwelling-camel-humping-wife-beating-child-molesting-flag-burning-shoe-waving-fly-swatting-smelly-a*s-rat-bastards".
Doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but it is slightly more accurate and descriptive than "raghead".
Just because Muslims killed thousands of innocent people during 9/11 and blow up children on a daily basis is no reason to hurt their feelings with name calling. I'm shocked.
Robert Byrd has known plenty of white 'ragheads'.
Ann says what everybody is thinking anyway. Naturally that makes her a lightening rod for PC criticism, but I'm glad she takes the heat. I think it at least provides a little "push back" against the PC tide.
When did she do that?
Call 'em as you see 'em Ann!
I could care less what they think, I like Coulter. She perhaps turns off a few moderates that we might get to vote for us otherwise, but who cares? Coulter is entertaining, end of story.
Sorry, but Ann, who is usually spot-on, and 'wickedly funny' as the article avers, blew it big-time with the 'raghead' comment.
The problem is 'raghead' is a general purpose perjorative for men from turban-wearing cultures. The pre-eminent turban-wearers are the Sikhs, who have suffered more dead at the hands of Islam than America has.
I'm favoring "Mohammedans" as the thing to call Muslims--it's accurate, and
angers them by pointing to the fact they follow a man, while they claim to submit to God. It also has a long tradition of use: Churchill's notable frenzy and fatalism description of Islam calls them Mohammedans.
It's called "collateral damage."
DEAL WITH IT!
Boy, the Dems can dish it out but they sure can't take it. I agree that Ann is sometimes an over the top bomb thrower, but she learned it from the left side of the aisle. What makes Ann noticable is that she is really the only National conservative commentator who has this go for the jugular approach. Virtually EVERY democratic commentator uses this approach and much, much worse. I rarely read a liberal editorial that doesn't consist merely of the most vile insults imaginable at President Bush and all conservatives. That's all the Dems have at this point. Before he goes throwing stones at Ann, I think the author should work on cleaning up his own house.
Humph...I would love to "have" a problem like Ann Coulter. Hubba, hubba...
Anne's great comment on the V-P:
"Cheney is my ideal man. Because he's solid. He's funny. He's very handsome. He was a football player. People don't think about him as the glamour type because he's a serious person, he wears glasses, he's lost his hair. But he's a very handsome man. And you cannot imagine him losing his temper, which I find extremely sexy. Men who get upset and lose their tempers and claim to be sensitive males: talk about girly boys. No, there's a reason hurricanes are named after women and homosexual men, it's one of our little methods of social control. We're supposed to fly off the handle. "
"Ann Coulter, even when she goes too far"
I never read her "going too far". When it comes to excess, the Demoncrat Senators have the market cornered.
"Ann Coulter, even when she goes too far"
I never read her "going too far". When it comes to excess, the Demoncrat Senators have the market cornered.
Let's face it, the conservative movement's pundits are generally prudes. Ann stands out because she is not a prude. She fights fire with fire. The debate rhetoric of most conservative pundits can be likened to liberals attempts to treat foreign transnational terrorists legalistically, rather than as a military objective.
Just my personal preference.