Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Told of ATF Seizures, Threats to Gun Buyers
CNSNews.com ^ | February 17, 2006 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 02/17/2006 11:16:14 AM PST by SonofLiberty1

Congress Told of ATF Seizures, Threats to Gun Buyers By Jeff Johnson CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer February 17, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - Agents of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), allegedly acting without warrants or legislative authority to do so, seized firearms from at least 50 gun show patrons in Virginia according to congressional testimony and an agency document made public Wednesday. Witnesses also testified that African-American and female gun buyers in Richmond, Va., and Pittsburgh, Pa., were profiled based on their race or sex and some in Pittsburgh were threatened with arrest by ATF agents for alleged actions that are not violations of law.

Rep. Howard Coble (R-N.C.) chairs the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security, which has jurisdiction over ATF. While he supports the agency's mission, Coble questions some of its tactics.

"ATF reports that 206 [gun show] participants were stopped and interviewed while it confiscated firearms from another 50 participants," Coble said, referring to gun shows in Richmond, Va. "Although most of the firearms were ultimately returned, the purchasers were notified via official letter from ATF that [they] were ordered to appear at the local ATF office to discuss their transactions. In addition, the letter explained that failure to appear could result in an arrest warrant being issued for the alleged charges."

The form letter had blanks for the name of the gun show patron and the date and time they were ordered to appear at the ATF field office, but cited no authority for the gun confiscations or the mandatory office visits.

"An investigation has revealed that you may have violated Title 18 U.S.C. Section 924(a)(1)(A), a crime punishable by imprisonment for up to five years," the letter began. The U.S. Code citation refers, in this instance, to knowingly making a false statement on the ATF Form 4473 "Firearms Transaction Record Part I - Over-The-Counter," which is completed for each firearm purchased from a federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL).

"The firearm that you purchased is being taken into ATF custody," the letter continued, citing no authority for the seizure.

Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) said the ATF letter and the reported interrogation of lawful gun buyers raise "serious questions."

"There's a way to have a sting operation that's legal. This dragnet, apparent dragnet, however, is not the way it ought to be done," Scott said. "You have to show probable cause and it can be done. But you ought not just stop people without probable cause and without any indication of guilt."

John White, a former law enforcement officer who is now an FFL operating under the business name "The Gunsmith," said female customers who approached his sales area at the Richmond shows were immediately targeted by the "undercover" officers.

"If a woman showed up at my table, she was surrounded by law enforcement," White recalled. "If the lady walked off and suddenly stopped, they would have bumped into each other. Their surveillance methods were pitiful.

"Every woman that makes a purchase, every woman who comes to my table to buy a gun was automatically [treated as] a straw purchaser," White said. (A "straw purchaser" is a person who can otherwise legally purchase a firearm, but who does so with the intent to illegally provide it to an ineligible buyer such as a convicted felon or an illegal alien. "Straw purchases" are illegal.)

As Cybercast News Service initially reported, ATF agents working with as many as 400 state, county and city police officers near Richmond, Va., conducted so-called "residency checks" on individuals who purchased firearms from the Showmasters Gun Show Aug. 13 and 14, 2005. Uniformed officers went to the homes of prospective gun buyers, while they waited for their National Instant Check System (NICS) background checks to be completed and questioned family members and neighbors about the gun buyers' firearm purchasing habits.

In a subsequent report, Cybercast News Service detailed that ATF had conducted at least seven similar gun show "sting operations" targeting Richmond-area residents since July of 2004. ATF refused to discuss any of the operations with Cybercast News Service and refused to provide any documentation in response to Freedom of Information Act requests filed by the sponsors of the Richmond gun shows.

Suzanne McComas, a licensed private investigator who has worked with the America's Most Wanted television program, was hired by the National Rifle Association (NRA) to gather information about ATF's Richmond operations. During her investigation, she learned that the agency had been conducting "residency checks" in at least one other U.S. city, but using different and "much more intimidating" tactics.

"At Pittsburgh, the Firearms Task Force there that's also headed by the ATF, instead of doing residency checks immediately, they're collecting the 4473 with the purchaser's address on it, then they go knock at the door about a week later and ask, 'Could we see the gun that you bought?'" McComas explained. "There's absolutely no process involved, there's no reason for them to do it. If you cannot produce the gun, they ask you for the sale paperwork. If you refuse to produce the paperwork they put you under arrest for a 'straw purchase.'"

Federal law requires licensed gun dealers to complete an ATF Form 4473 for each firearm sold through their business, in addition to any forms required by the state, county and/or city where they do business. Private sales between individuals, who are not engaged in the firearms trade as a business, are subject to no such federal recordkeeping requirements. Therefore a gun show purchaser could legally sell or even give the gun they purchased to someone else yet have no paperwork to meet the ATF's demand.

"You and I know that, but [a woman who bought a gun and then gave or sold it to someone else, both legally] probably doesn't," McComas told Cybercast News Service. "If she can't produce it, they arrest her for a straw purchase and her life turns into a living hell until she can prove otherwise. It's zero probable cause except for the fact that they thought it was a straw purchase because she was black and she was young and she was female."

McComas questioned not only the legality of the ATF tactics in Pittsburgh, but also the methodology.

"When I asked them what their criteria was for the people that they collected the 4473s on at the Pittsburgh show, the answer I got back was, 'If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck. That's all we need,'" McComas continued. "Translation: Under 30 and black, period. That's all they were looking for. Anyone who meets those criteria, they're doing a follow-up on."

She said that, as in Richmond, agents in Pittsburgh were also engaged in activities that gun dealers believe were designed to discourage lawful purchases by minorities.

"Anyone who was a minority, they picked up their 'tail,' if you will, and just followed them through the gun show. When they stopped at a table, the agents would literally stand on one side or the other and watch what they were doing. If they started to purchase a gun [the agents] would ask them why they were buying it, what were they buying it for, what did they need that gun for," McComas related. "It was ridiculous. There was absolutely no reason for it other than the color of their skin."

Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.) said he had not intended to attend the hearing, which was held immediately after a subcommittee vote on an unrelated bill, but stayed because he was fascinated by the witnesses' testimony.

"These must be the dumbest ATF agents in the entire agency," Delahunt said. "I am absolutely shocked that they could be that stupid.

"It's almost to the point that it's difficult to believe," he added. "I have never heard of an experience like the ones you recount, but you all seem to be in agreement. It's just mind-boggling."

Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.) expressed curiosity that federal law enforcement officers would not know that the actions described by White and McComas violate federal statutes.

"Did anybody mention that it is a federal crime to deny women or minorities their civil rights?" Feeney asked. "Did anybody mention to the ATF that denying civil rights, including the right to bear arms, is a federal crime?"

Feeney suggested that, since ATF had refused to comply with the Freedom of Information Act requests from the gun show promoters, the subcommittee should request the information they were seeking. Coble noted that such a letter had already been sent.

ATF representatives present at Wednesday's hearing reluctantly identified themselves by raising their hands when asked to do so by Coble. They would not respond to the new allegations raised in the hearing, but referred questions to their press office. ATF officials are expected to testify on the issues raised Wednesday in a second hearing scheduled for Feb. 28.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; atf; bang; banglist; billofrights; bradywatch; constitutionlist; disbandthem; govwatch; jackbootedthugs; jbt; libertarians; unintendedcnsequncs; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last

1 posted on 02/17/2006 11:16:15 AM PST by SonofLiberty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
so when exactly is george bush (hes a conservative you know )going to disband these gangbangers with badges? Oh thats right when satan wins the ice sculpture competition

Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here

2 posted on 02/17/2006 11:21:50 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
ATF - a redneck's nightmare.

"They took mah beer, mah Copenhagen, and mah .45"

(just for the record, I don't think I have six degrees of separation from 'redneck' myself.)

3 posted on 02/17/2006 11:22:32 AM PST by Sax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Joe Brower; Mr. Mojo; DaveLoneRanger

ping


4 posted on 02/17/2006 11:22:58 AM PST by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be a convenience store, not a government agency.


5 posted on 02/17/2006 11:24:28 AM PST by KarlInOhio (In this year's White House play, Henry VI part II, VP Cheney got the role of Dick the Butcher.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
6 posted on 02/17/2006 11:25:46 AM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

The agents involved should be jailed for life for civil rights violations and abusing their official authorities. Yes, jailed for LIFE, no parol.


7 posted on 02/17/2006 11:25:59 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

If this crap were to happen to me, I would tell the ATF to kiss my a$$, and take my chances in court. This is nothing short of intimidation. I am not one of those 'Militia" freaks, but I hate the ATF. These clowns consitantly overstep their bounds, and don't give a damn who's lives they destroy. The ATF needs to be thrown into the Dust-bin of History along with Stalin, Hitler, Lennin, Pol Pot..........


8 posted on 02/17/2006 11:26:31 AM PST by sean327 (All men are created equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

LOL!!!


9 posted on 02/17/2006 11:27:21 AM PST by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
Considering the agents like to scare people with legal references, let's add one against the agents:
Section 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

10 posted on 02/17/2006 11:27:45 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

Someone (the NRA? SLF? GOA?) should be sueing this agency and these agents for civil rights violations.


11 posted on 02/17/2006 11:27:49 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Be Ever Vigilant!


12 posted on 02/17/2006 11:28:38 AM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
Disband the BATF and ship 'em all off to our southern border. Let 'em harass illegals for a change.
13 posted on 02/17/2006 11:28:44 AM PST by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
My experience with the ATF, on a military range in Maryland, is that they were just Mall Cops with guns. Heck, Barney Fife is more competent then the ATF in a fire-fight.


14 posted on 02/17/2006 11:29:17 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
"These must be the dumbest ATF agents in the entire agency," Delahunt said. "I am absolutely shocked that they could be that stupid.

So, how many of you believe that it's only the State Department that is infested by PC RAT minions?

15 posted on 02/17/2006 11:30:02 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

Jack
Booted
Thugs


16 posted on 02/17/2006 11:30:28 AM PST by IGOTMINE (Front Sight. Press. Follow Through. It's a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

So where is the "Bush's fault" commentary?
It certainly can be placed at his feet if, like Truman, he comprehended where "the buck" really stops.

This agency needs a fast kick in the teeth from on high and from constitutionalists.


17 posted on 02/17/2006 11:33:14 AM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
If they started to purchase a gun [the agents] would ask them why they were buying it, what were they buying it for, what did they need that gun for,"...

It is really a good thing that they didn't ask me that question. I'd have probably ended up in jail for saying something like "to protect myself against a-holes like you."

Operations like this reinforce my opinion that every gun owner should have at least one gun - and all related ammo and accessories - that isn't on paper. Buy it from another gun owner who's not an FFL, or buy an antique - both for cash. Of course, I have yet to follow my own advice :>)

18 posted on 02/17/2006 11:35:21 AM PST by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Dumb question. If a number of legally brought guns are getting into the hands of street criminals via straw buyers, how does one stop it? Are petty criminals using their girlfriends to buy handguns at gunshows? As a gun owner I think it behooves the gun community to come up with a common sense technique to shut off this illegal avenue for guns. The last famous female straw buyer armed the two underage boys who did the Columbine shootings, which gave liberals the political ammunition for the AWB. The Consitution alone does not prevent gun confiscations, smart politics and public relations is also needed.


19 posted on 02/17/2006 11:35:50 AM PST by Fee (`+Great powers never let minor allies dictate who, where and when they must fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

But doncha feel nice and safe, though? Remember, all we have to do is get us a Republican majority and all of this intrusive government stuff will stop.


20 posted on 02/17/2006 11:37:28 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: SonofLiberty1
Agents of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), allegedly acting without warrants or legislative authority to do so, seized firearms from at least 50 gun show patrons in Virginia...

Looks like Virginia has fallen. I wonder why patriots would allow such disgusting abuses to take place.

22 posted on 02/17/2006 11:41:10 AM PST by eskimo (Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee

Do you mind the government knowing how many guns you have?


23 posted on 02/17/2006 11:41:51 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
If they broke the law, and it sounds as though they did, I'd like to know what the congress does about it.

"When I asked them what their criteria was for the people that they collected the 4473s on at the Pittsburgh show, the answer I got back was, 'If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck. That's all we need,'" McComas continued.

Gov't out of control

24 posted on 02/17/2006 11:42:05 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George_Bailey

"Do you know what would happen to these traitorous jack-booted thugs in prison?"


Anything the gangs would like and I wouldn't help stop?


25 posted on 02/17/2006 11:42:08 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
I worked in Civil Service for 20 years and I can tell you for certain that this type activity is never done without full knowledge of either the President or his close associates.

The close associates would never approve it without full kowledge that the president had indicated he approved.

26 posted on 02/17/2006 11:42:25 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: basil; songbird51; Ladysmith

27 posted on 02/17/2006 11:45:00 AM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1; derllak

"If they started to purchase a gun [the agents] would ask them why they were buying it, what were they buying it for, what did they need that gun for,"

Personally I wouldn't pee on an ATF agent to put out a fire.

Congress needs to get these jack booted thugs under control, NOW.


28 posted on 02/17/2006 11:47:00 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks; Pete-R-Bilt; B4Ranch
Y'all might want to ping your redneck friends to this...
29 posted on 02/17/2006 11:47:15 AM PST by tubebender (Everything I know about computers I learned on Free Republic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee
Straw purchasers are ofter a straw dog. It does happen sometimes but probably never results in someone obtaining a gun who couldn't get it some other way.

A lot of people don't even know it it illegal to buy a gun for another. For that matter a parent who buys a gun for their Son's Christmas present might be considered a "straw purchase" by many.

These agents weren't going after people they had any reason to suspect. They were going after all of the women.

30 posted on 02/17/2006 11:47:27 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Spirited
So where is the "Bush's fault" commentary?

I'll bite. It's a really good thing that we have strong supporters of the second amendment like Jorge Bush in the white house, and a republican controlled house and senate, otherwise the BATF might get out of control. </sarcasm>

I firmly believe that Bush and Company have bought into the "duck hunting" theory of the second amendment. He does not support the right that Madison penned.

31 posted on 02/17/2006 11:49:24 AM PST by zeugma (Muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Fee
"If a number of legally brought guns are getting into the hands of street criminals via straw buyers, how does one stop it? "

First, provide the proof that this is happening. That's a pretty big "If."

If if if.

Where is your proof? Prove it, and then we will talk.

F-Troop should be disbanded completely. Read, "Unintended Consequences."

32 posted on 02/17/2006 11:49:49 AM PST by MonroeDNA (Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

the kinder, gentler Jim Crow ATF.


33 posted on 02/17/2006 11:51:32 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Muslims pray to Allah, Allah prays to Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
ATF : A**h*les Toting Firearms.

I HATE these thugs.

34 posted on 02/17/2006 11:53:33 AM PST by Centurion2000 ("If you're going to shoot somebody, Shoot! Don't talk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

federal Bureau of FATE (Firearms, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Explosives)

35 posted on 02/17/2006 11:54:24 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio
>>>...all we have to do is get us a Republican CONSERVATIVE majority and all of this intrusive government stuff will stop.

THAT is the real problem here. If "Republican" ain't "Conservative" it ain't S#!T.

36 posted on 02/17/2006 11:55:13 AM PST by HKMk23 (Tengo una remera del Che y no se por que.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

Jackbooted government thugs at work on the taxpayer's dime.


37 posted on 02/17/2006 11:55:16 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA

"F-Troop should be disbanded completely. Read, 'Unintended Consequences'."

One helluva book. I keep waiting for a Henry Bowman to surface.


38 posted on 02/17/2006 11:56:28 AM PST by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sax

Rednecks hold the invention of the wheelbarrow as the primary reason why we can walk upright today.

My knees have not yet healed from my early days of scampering around on all fours. Thank goodness I never developed the hoofs, my granny was certain I would.


39 posted on 02/17/2006 11:57:06 AM PST by B4Ranch (No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fee

Just remember, "Gun Show Loophole" is Brady Bunch code for "Eliminate Private Sales".

From http://www.tsrapac.org/gnshtalk.htm

According to the National Institute of Justice, the research arm of the U.S. Department of Justice (NIJ), study released in December 1997, less than 2 percent of criminal guns come from gun shows. The same study found that twenty-five percent of crime guns came from gun stores, even though FBI permission is required for every purchase from a gun store. (Homicide in Eight U.S. Cities, page 99.)

A June 2000 federal study, Federal Firearms Offenders, 1992-98 likewise finds only 1.7% of federal prison inmates obtaining their gun from a gun show. (Plus 1.5% from a "flea market.")

That finding is consistent with a mid-1980s study for the NIJ, which investigated the gun purchase and use habits of convicted felons in 12 state prisons. The study (later published as the book Armed and Considered Dangerous) found that gun shows were such a minor source of criminal gun acquisition that they were not even worth reporting as a separate figure.

At the November 1999 meeting of the American Society of Criminology, a study of youthful offenders in Michigan reported that only 3 percent of the youths in the study had acquired their last handgun from a gun show.
"
Even for the tiny percentage of criminal guns acquired at for gun shows (and the 25% figure for gun stores) does not mean that the criminal necessarily purchased the gun himself at that location. Many persons with criminal records use a “straw man” purchaser--someone with a clean record who buys the gun, and then transfers it to the criminal.

“Straw man” purchases have been classified a federal felony since the Gun Control Act of 1968; the federal law against straw purchases was strengthened in 1986 by the NRA-sponsored Firearms Owners Protection Act.

According to the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence (the legal/educational arm of Handgun Control, Inc.), the group's own survey of major-city police chiefs found only 2 out of 48 who said that guns from gun shows (both “legal and illegal sales” according to the questionnaire) were a major problem in their city.

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms produced a paper in early 1999 which said that 10% of gun traces (not crime guns) came from gun shows (included purchases made from licensed dealers, and purchases from private individuals). As the Congressional Research Service has explained, BATF gun traces reveal no meaningful information about gun use in crime; traces are initiated at the request of local police, and can be requested for all sorts of reasons (e.g., to aid the recovery of a stolen gun, for curiosity). Most BATF gun traces do not involve crime guns taken from violent criminals.


40 posted on 02/17/2006 11:57:36 AM PST by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

41 posted on 02/17/2006 11:58:31 AM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
Friends, this is pure and simply governmental abuse. We cannot stand still for this. We must be prepared to exercise our Constitutional rights.

If each of us requests a copy of the records of the BATF covering these events, that should keep them busy for a while.

Otherwise, I would face arrest before I would answer any of the questions that were asked.

42 posted on 02/17/2006 11:58:40 AM PST by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
(CNSNews.com) - Agents of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), allegedly acting without warrants or legislative authority to do so, seized firearms from at least 50 gun show patrons in Virginia according to congressional testimony and an agency document made public Wednesday. Witnesses also testified that African-American and female gun buyers in Richmond, Va., and Pittsburgh, Pa., were profiled based on their race or sex and some in Pittsburgh were threatened with arrest by ATF agents for alleged actions that are not violations of law.

Meanwhile they will do absolutely nothing about the illegal aliens I have pointed to them acquiring arms via civil loopholes.

The ATF is run by a bunch of dopey Clinton lawyers

43 posted on 02/17/2006 11:59:19 AM PST by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
"Did anybody mention that it is a federal crime to deny women or minorities their civil rights?" Feeney asked. "Did anybody mention to the ATF that denying civil rights, including the right to bear arms, is a federal crime?"

Just as soon as ATF agents are arrested and convicted for violating the civil rights of gun buyers, they'll start giving a rat's a$$. A law with no enforcement is no law. That goes double for laws meant to restrain law enforcement officers.

44 posted on 02/17/2006 12:03:20 PM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sean327

ME TOO.........ARREST ME, AND THEN I WILL SUE, BIG TIME..............


45 posted on 02/17/2006 12:10:34 PM PST by joe fonebone (Woodstock defined the current crop of libs, but who cleaned up the mess they left?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ImpotentRage
I keep waiting for a Henry Bowman to surface.

Yep.

Or an Andrew Fletcher (Black Arrow). Or a Brad Fallon (Enemies: Foreign and Domestic). Or a Zoro...

Frog pots at a boil and the hogs are hungry.

Ain't no one wants to be the first gopher to pop his head above the berm.

46 posted on 02/17/2006 12:11:47 PM PST by Dead Corpse (I believe that all government is evil, and that trying to improve it is largely a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
...If they started to purchase a gun [the agents] would ask them why they were buying it, what were they buying it for, what did they need that gun for...

That'd get them :-)

47 posted on 02/17/2006 12:11:57 PM PST by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dd5339; cavtrooper21

ping to read


48 posted on 02/17/2006 12:13:05 PM PST by Vic3O3 (Jeremiah 31:16-17 (KJV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I think that this committee needs to expand it's investigation/questioning to include other incidents. Other gun shows, John Glover, etc. need to be included to give the committee and Congress the full scope of the ineptitude/corruption of the BATFE. However, I think that "not listening" is more likely to happen.
49 posted on 02/17/2006 12:15:22 PM PST by looscnnn ("Olestra (Olean) applications causes memory leaks" PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
Of course they could also be sitting there saying "yeah right, a federal government agency would never do that".


50 posted on 02/17/2006 12:21:11 PM PST by looscnnn ("Olestra (Olean) applications causes memory leaks" PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson