Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUBAI-ITIES: hillary 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' clinton strikes again
The American Spectator, Free Republic, O'Reilly Report, C-SPAN | 3.06.06 | Mia T

Posted on 03/06/2006 10:48:55 AM PST by Mia T

DUBAI-ITIES:
HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON STRIKES AGAIN

by Mia T, March 6, 2006

 

 


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
audio montage, Lincoln-pose scoop:
rushlimbaugh.com

'REFUSAL TO LEVEL WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'
... IS HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON'S MIDDLE NAME
by Mia T, February 16, 2006


DUBAI DUETS
The American Spectator ^ | 3/6/06 | Washington Prowler

Late Friday, Department of Justice lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel were attempting to determine if former President Bill Clinton had registered as an "Agent of a Foreign Principal."


Federal statute requires that anyone -- even a former President -- doing political or public affairs work on behalf of a foreign country, agency or official must register with the Department, and essentially update his status every six months. It was not clear the Clinton had done so.

If his status is less clear, here is what we do know: If Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton did not know about her husband's standing with the United Arab Emirates and with Dubai World Ports, members of her Senate staff most assuredly did.

"There were enough people in the Clintons' orbit who were potentially going to be part of the deal," says an employee of a firm that does work for both Clintons. "We were pursuing work on the ports deal, and we cleared our participation with Clinton's office. We didn't want there to be a conflict."

In fact, at least two senior outside advisers to Senator Clinton were attempting to get business out of the Port Deal, and President Clinton was the go-between. Associates with the Glover Park Group, which houses just about the entire shadow staff for Hillary's run-up to a Democratic presidential bid, were attempting to get a slice of the DPW deal before the deal was made public about three weeks ago. According to current and former President Clinton staff, Hillary Clinton's Senate office was aware that Glover Park was in the running to do work on the DPW deal.

"She was also very much aware of President Clinton's financial arrangements with the UAE," says a former Bill Clinton staffer. "We're talking about more than a million dollars, some of paid out soon out after they left the White House. That income helped the Clintons buy the properties that allow them to live both in New York and Washington, D.C.. This was not an insignificant financial arrangement."

What is not clear is whether or not the junior Senator from New York was aware that Clinton was acting as an agent of a foreign principal, which Clinton clearly was. According to sources with knowledge of the deal, President Clinton was advising members of the DPW buyout team in the UAE, London and Washington before the deal hit the headlines. He encouraged them to hire a number of people working in consulting firms based in Washington with whom he had both personal and financial ties: The Cohen Group, the Albright Group, and the Glover Park Group. Other sources claim that longtime Clinton confidante and golf partner Vernon Jordan's name was also suggested as potential helpful fixer in the capital.

Much of this activity and consultation took place before the DPW deal hit the front pages of newspapers in mid-February, and about ten days before the DPW deal was to close in Great Britain.


DICK MORRIS:
CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI

by Mia T, 03.03.06

 

READ MORE

Sen. 'KnowNothing Victim' Clinton Holds News Conference
EFFECTIVELY PLEADS FIFTH BY INVOKING SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE

by Mia T, February 23, 2001

 

 







ASHINGTON- February 22. Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton held her premiere press conference today on Capitol Hill, ostensibly to answer questions about the peddling of White House pardons by her brother and her campaign treasurer. Notably absent among the press queries were any about her own involvement not only in those pardons, but in the larger universe of sold pardons--the incipient clinton scandal du jour--Pardongate.

KnowNothing's brother, Hugh Rodham, secured two of the 141 clinton midnight pardons, one for a cocaine kingpin and the other for a snake-oil swindler. Rodham netted a quick $400,000 for his "work" according to various rodhams and clintons and their assorted lawyers. KnowNothing's campaign treasurer, William Cunningham III, himself a law partner of longtime KnowNothing adviser Harold Ickes, helped obtain last-minute pardons for two convicted felons.


 LA FAMIGLIA

Displaying a willingness to throw her brother (along with her husband) to the wolves, Sen. Victim Clinton was quick to make a distinction between her big, bad brother's pardon "work" and that of her campaign treasurer, "a fine lawyer and a fine man." The "family" connection of brother Rodham to Clinton rendered Rodham's "work" offensive, whereas the campaign treasurer Cunningham's connection to the senator and her campaign coffers made his securing of two pardons in record time a sterling example of highminded, effective public service.

KnowNothing has apparently not thought this thing through. If the "family" connection makes lobbying for cocaine-kingpin and snake-oil-swindler pardons unsavory for brother Rodham, then the "family" connection makes lobbying for the Hasidim 4 (see Keating 5) pardons even more distasteful for the wife, First Lady and senator-elect. Moreover, pardons for votes is arguably a greater offense than pardons for cash.



EFFECTIVELY PLEADS FIFTH BY INVOKING SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE

KnowNothing specifically declined to answer when asked whether she discussed the pardons with her husband, effectively pleading the fifth. Turning aside questions about the pardon decisions her husband had made, she told reporters they should address those issues with him and his staff. She refused to say whether he should agree to appear voluntarily before congressional committees investigating the pardons. Interestingly, no one asked her whether she would agree to appear voluntarily before those same congressional committees.

I DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH THAT PARDON

"I did not have any involvement in the pardons that were granted or not granted," insisted Sen. KnowNothing, seeming to forget her presence at the New-Square/Oval-Office schmooze that secured pardons for the four Hasidic felons who set up a phony school in Brooklyn to swindle the government out of millions intended for the poor.

 

RESURRECTING RUFF

KnowNothing noted that her"best memory" was that she never spoke to her brother or to Mr. Cunningham about the pardons. With variations of "I don't have a memory" and "my best memory, and avoiding the more obvious "I don't recall" and "my best recollection," KnowNothing reprised the Ruffian standard used during the clinton years to commit perjury without penalty.
 

I GET LETTERS

...or more precisely, envelopes. During her denials of involvement in any of the pardons, KnowNothing made the curious claim: "People handed me envelopes, I passed them on [and never opened a single one. Honest.]"

 




 






I AM VICTIM

Reprising the role of victim that enabled her to win a senate seat in spite of low poll numbers, high personal negatives and consistent public failures, the senator peppered her answers about big, bad Hugh (understanding that the subtext was big, bad Bill) with "saddened" and "disappointed" and "heartbroken" and "shocked."

UTTER CONTEMPT FOR THE PEOPLE

This session today was cut short by a staffer when reporters appeared dissatisfied by Senator KnowNothing's lack of candor.

In the end, this press conference full of poses, poll-tested phrases and prevarication was just another display of the clintons' utter contempt for the people. Bill Clinton committed the same error last Sunday in his shameless, lie-filled New York Times Pardongate Apologia.

The clintons' fundamental error: They are too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.

(bill + hillary) CLINTON 'CULTURE OF CORRUPTION'
by Mia T, 01.28.06

 



"When you look at the way the House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation, and you know what I'm talkin' about. [Note the gratuitous g-droppin'.]

... We have a
culture of corruption. We have cronyism. We have incompetence. I predict to you that this administration will go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country."

(
Miss hillary also apologized to a group of Hurricane Katrina evacuees in the audience "on behalf of a government that left you behind.)

 

hillary clinton
Martin Luther King Day
Monday, January 16, 2006
Canaan Baptist Church of Christ
Harlem, New York City
GONE WITH THE WIND
(miss hillary's '
plantation' blunder)

READ MORE





COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: albright; bill; billcohen; clinton; clintoncorruption; cultureofcorruption; dubai; gwot; hillary; hillary2006; hillary2008; port; ports; terrorism; terrorists; vernonjordan; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: ncountylee
Nope, she's running for re-election this year and anyone running against her, can and will use this against her. Should she be stupid enough, to take on the Dem '08 presidential primary, DEMS will use this against her.
41 posted on 03/06/2006 5:28:36 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bttt


42 posted on 03/06/2006 5:51:07 PM PST by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

bump.
The Dems are repulsed by this loser's sense of entitlement.


43 posted on 03/06/2006 6:04:20 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

AS the truly ego-maniacally-infantilistic male Cli'ton runs about the Earth hedonistically seeking and soaking up the public and private plaudits and plums provided him by his foreign owners operators and controllers, one is reminded that the Cli'tons collectively lack the mental capacity to operate as a team and that neither has either the intellectual or organizational ability to function alone.

Some glimpses have been provided from time to time of our first Billionaire-co-presidents' hugely-rewarding Rich/Soros/Moscow/Hammer/Li/Riady/Peking/bin-Laden-Family/Middle-East/Cocaine/Columbia connections and underpinnings but most often any would-be whistleblowers has been found face-down in a ditch.

So perhaps our best hope is that a repeat of Fort Macy Park will become a necessity as the male Clinton's infantile inability to quit his on-the-road punk rocker-like life of abandon tends to more and more run counter the the mad cow's ambitions and to risk exposing the real manifestations of evil whose product and empty glove puppet each of them is?

Let us pray .......


44 posted on 03/07/2006 12:21:29 AM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
This goes out to my muslim brothers
Bush says that you guys mean well
But I don't trust you, Dubai port world!
Tell the British not to sell!
You, selling me some things that aren't good for me
I'm surprised I agree with Chuck and Hillary!
Crazy A-rabs in sheets
Crazy A-rabs in sheets, no ports for them to run!
Crazy A-rabs in sheets!
45 posted on 03/07/2006 12:37:08 AM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
My criticism of the ports deal has nothing to do with hindsight. Just the opposite. The dangers for the country, the dangers for the GOP, the dangers for Bush, were self-evident.

To win this war, the Ds--and certainly the clintons--must not regain power. Bush must have the courage to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst. (Bush has little support today primarily because he failed to do this.)

The ports deal uproar is really not about trade. Survival is the undeniable subtext, which means instinct and common sense rule.

Common sense tells us that there are so many layers, so many variables, no one can possibly define--much less control--all possible risks.

Common sense tells us that dubious (no pun intended) characters and countries involved in vital infrastructure increase risk by definition.

(If one listened closely to Rush Limbaugh yesterday, one would have heard him say that the ports deal doesn't increase risk appreciably. He did not say the ports deal is without increased risk.)

That the usual corrupt, self-serving clintonoid suspects (clinton, clinton, Albright, Bill Cohen, Vernon Jordan) are in on the action--that they are circling the deal like vultures--should give us pause....

DUBAI-ITIES:
HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON STRIKES AGAIN

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton



46 posted on 03/07/2006 1:27:23 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
I'm surprised I agree with... Hillary!--Captainpaintball

Don't
take
hillary's
opposition
to the
ports
deal
on
face
value.

We all
know
who the
bagman is
in
this
--uh--
relationship.


Sen. Hillary... has emerged as a leading voice in opposition to the deal, saying, "Our port security is too important to place in the hands of foreign governments."... This is more than a security problem, she says - it's "a larger problem" of ceding "some of our fiscal sovereignty."

... Hubby Bill, on the other hand, supports Dubai. Big time.

He not only supports it, he's even been advising the company on the sly on how to get around the opposition of senators like - well, Hillary.

Better still, he reportedly tried to get Dubai Ports World to hire his former mouthpiece, Joe Lockhart, as its new spokesman in Washington.

... Actually, Bill's been a big fan of Dubai for some time now.

It goes back to when that government - which actually owns Dubai Ports World - kicked in very big bucks indeed to his presidential library.

Since 2002, it's been paying him for speeches there - at $300,000 a pop.

Talk about having your cake and eating it, too: Despite his support for the company, the former prez says his wife and other critics have a legitimate beef.

This neat little arrangement keeps the Clintons covered on all sides of the issue. And it helps tuck a little boodle in the family piggy bank, too.

But then, that's the way the Clintons operate. One hand washes the other, and all that matters is advancing the Clinton self-interest.

Fiscally.

And politically.

The legendary Tammany Hall figure George Washington Plunkitt used to put it like this: "I seen my opportunities, and I took 'em."

Bill 'n Hill, too.

EXCERPT
'CLINTON VS. CLINTON' INC.
Editorial
March 4, 2006
New York Post


47 posted on 03/07/2006 2:07:08 AM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

<< To win this war, the Ds -- and certainly the clintons -- must not regain power. Bush must have the courage to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst. [Bush has little support today primarily because he failed to do this] >>

Absolutely. Agree wholeheartedly.

<< That the usual corrupt, self-serving clintonoid suspects (clinton, clinton, Albright, Bill Cohen, Vernon Jordan) are in on the action -- that they are circling the deal like vultures -- should give us pause ....>>

It most certainly has me riveted.

That this one also has Michael Savage willingly shilling for such absolutely cynical and exclusively self-serving schemers as Schumer scares the Heck outta me too.

The "ports situation" has now become so Goebbels-ized and demagogued that Mr Bush's only option -- and a losing option at that, is to find a way to have "his" administration; a few hapless political appointees, that is -- and the for-generations-already anti-American and virulently anti-Republican activist-Democrat-owned permanent public-service -- find a way to reverse a commercial transaction so ordinary as to have, virtually without comment, [Except when Clinton gave Long Beach and our Panama Canal to his Peking partners] happened a hundred times previously.

I also fear that which ever way he cuts it this one may well be the issue that'll be looked back on as the Bush presidency's jumping of the shark. And will see Congressman King's and Susan Collins' et al's sacrifice of sufficient congressional seats to asher in as speaker one Nancy Pelosi.

And initiate our loss of the war for Civilization's survival.


48 posted on 03/07/2006 2:40:19 AM PST by Brian Allen (How arrogant are we to believe our career political-power-lusting lumpen somehow superior to theirs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

you have mail/ bttt


49 posted on 03/07/2006 5:03:02 PM PST by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Bttt.

5.56mm

50 posted on 03/07/2006 8:07:23 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson