Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s behind Bush's bad poll numbers? (Presidency is beginning to resemble Carter's, Nixon's)
The Washington Post ^ | March 7, 2006 | Alan Abramowitz

Posted on 03/08/2006 8:30:19 AM PST by presidio9

Judging by the numbers, last week wasn’t a good week for George Bush. Of course, news that the administration had approved a deal to turn over the operation of six U.S. ports to a company owned by the United Arab Emirates did nothing to buoy his sagging approval ratings.

But the truly damaging revelation, from a public relations perspective, was the admission by White House press secretary Scott McClellan that the president didn’t even know about the deal until after it had appeared on the front pages of newspapers around the country. That shocked even many Republican loyalists.

The problem for President Bush is a growing perception that he simply isn’t competent. That’s the story behind the polling numbers that have declined — bad week by bad week — since February 2005 when the president’s approval rating stood at a respectable 52 percent.

The predecessor whom Bush has begun to resemble isn’t, as many liberal Democrats seem to believe, Richard Nixon. It’s Jimmy Carter.

Carter’s political demise began when the American people, including many Democrats, started to perceive him as in over his head in the Oval Office. That’s what may be happening now to Bush.

Competence is not a partisan issue. Last week’s polls found that somewhere between 34 percent and 40 percent of Americans approved of Bush’s job performance.

(Excerpt) Read more at statesmanjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; carter; jobapproval; polls; ports; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: Snardius
The MSM is desperate to cover the impeachment of Bush.

Bush is dying the "Death From a Thousand Cuts" strategy employed by the MSN and the Democrats, helped by a wave of stupidity by some Republicans that are ready to throw Bush and their country from the life raft for personal gain. I have often heard that if you say it repeatedly and loud enough it becomes true. ( or at least believed by some of the sheeple.) This does seem to be the case.

21 posted on 03/08/2006 8:41:18 AM PST by River_Wrangler (Nothing difficult is ever easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Standby for heavy rolls.......the MSM's FULL COURT PRESS is just beginning. Now that MOST of the GOP has given up on GW the atmosphere will be almost unbearable by NOV.

Unless GW get's out there and fights these chicken littles in the MSM and BOTH parties, all the predicitons about his demise will certainly bear fruit.

Impeachment is a done deal if the Dims take over the House.

22 posted on 03/08/2006 8:41:23 AM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"If there's a White House agenda, its nowhere in sight. "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>....................
GOP could sweep into super majority in fall if they would just:
1. Secure the border
2. Control the illegals and deport them
3. eliminate the AMT in tax code
4. Stop the hemorrhage of US JOBS/INDUSTRY OVER SEAS by repeal of NAFTA and CAFTA.
think any of the above will get done.?? with this current ivy league globalist government we got??
23 posted on 03/08/2006 8:41:53 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

After the next GOP victory at the REAL polls you and your 1%ers will still be scratching your heads and wondering what happened after all the Treason Media assured you that Bush was going to sink everything.

But don't worry you won't be any MORE irrelevant after that election.


24 posted on 03/08/2006 8:42:09 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Which of these factors is more likely to cause Bush's numbers to fall:

1. The Dubai Ports Deal, widely disliked and mistrusted by people who don't really understand the issue
2. "Biased Poll Sampling"

Something would be wrong if his numbers didn't drop after #1.


25 posted on 03/08/2006 8:42:21 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
I think its funny, the MSM so concerned over Bush's falling numbers. Why is this happening? Media playing stupid. However, as much as I would like the MSM to be silenced or at least balanced. They still remain extremely powerful esp. when used with popular culture ie. Hollywood.
26 posted on 03/08/2006 8:42:30 AM PST by newconhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Agree with you there.


27 posted on 03/08/2006 8:43:09 AM PST by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

geez, Carter was in over his head the second he stepped into the WH, I smell BS


28 posted on 03/08/2006 8:43:57 AM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
4. Stop the hemorrhage of US JOBS/INDUSTRY OVER SEAS by repeal of NAFTA and CAFTA.

You know, all those made in Brazil and made in Canada trinkets in Wal Mart are just killing us.

29 posted on 03/08/2006 8:44:28 AM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

Bush's numbers were low before the deal was announced, thanks to #2, which has been well-documented on FR.


30 posted on 03/08/2006 8:45:27 AM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Enough conservatives are unhappy enough with Bush on immigration to say so if called by the polling companies. This diminishment, if even half accurate, would have to come from the right side.


31 posted on 03/08/2006 8:45:55 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Very quietly, casualty count is dropping. 0.88 per day this month so far, down from as high as 3 in October.


32 posted on 03/08/2006 8:46:36 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
See these two FR threads.

CBS News Admits They Ran a Bogus Bush Poll

CBS' latest attempt to manufacture numbers and poll more democrats

33 posted on 03/08/2006 8:46:59 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Don't mess with Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"The problem for President Bush is a growing perception that he simply isn’t competent. That’s the story behind the polling numbers that have declined — bad week by bad week — since February 2005 when the president’s approval rating stood at a respectable 52 percent."

LOL, when you have a news media like the Washington Compost that reports ONLY the negative and never the good that the president has accomplished, and even fabricate stories of supposed Bush bumbling like with the Katrina videos last week, then the perception of incompetence is one that's purely media-driven. They do nothing but bash the president and then write editorials about "Bush isn't competent and that's why no one likes him." But this idiotic article takes the media's bias a step further: It uses the media's slanted coverage that creates news and then tells us what to think about the news they've created.

Also, this piece of garbage from the Post relies on polls that are badly skewed with a huge over-representation of Democratic respondents to further back its contrived premise.

Finally, the idea that the president should have known about a fairly routine security clearance process for a pretty routine international transaction not even involving a US firm is a silly and ignorant assumption and purely niggling. That is minutae. The president cannot be involved in every process of the federal bureacracy. To claim that it proves he's "incomptent" is just pure straw man.

This once again goes to show how the media and the Democrats are in total lock-step in terms of their talking points. The Democrats have been using the phrase "incompetent" to describe the president for months. Oh surprise, surprise the lapdog media now picks up the same refrain!

How is it the president handled 9-11, the economy and so many other things so well until he got re-elected?? Did he start out competent and become incompetent? No, the only thing that changed was the media lost their friggin' minds when Bush was re-elected and set out to destroy him along with the rest of the drooling Bush haters. And this Compost hit piece is just another effort in that regard. Give it up losers. You're boring everyone.


34 posted on 03/08/2006 8:48:19 AM PST by MikeA (Rigged polls are what the news media uses to measure impact of their falsified anti-Bush reporting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The presstitutes are getting better. They didn't lie in this article until the second sentence....


35 posted on 03/08/2006 8:49:12 AM PST by eureka! (Hey Lefties and 'Rats: 3 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
Unless GW get's out there and fights these chicken littles in the MSM and BOTH parties, all the predicitons about his demise will certainly bear fruit.

And as you wrote that, the President is in New Orleans with Blanco and Nagin pledging more money to the disaster area. I think the President has made fourteen trips down there, spent a fortune, and most Americans are still saying he has not done enough to help New Orleans.

Why is he wasting his time?

36 posted on 03/08/2006 8:49:25 AM PST by Cagey (You don't pay taxes - they take taxes. ~Chris Rock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
I wouldn't say it is just Iraq. It is a combination of Iraq, the high gas prices, and mostly the continued war in the media against this president. Since they don't fight back hard enough, it has an effect over time.

Add up the chipping away with Iraq, Katrina, economy, Iran, oil, etc, it takes a toll. His capitulation on Katrina started the downhill slide, unfortunately, and temporary bad swings like the ports deal seem to have a big effect on his ratings. Note, too, when he get a low poll rating (rigged or not), the media continues to referecne only that one poll even after he recovers.
37 posted on 03/08/2006 8:49:56 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

the criminal MSM can rely on the polling of 1100 people- I'll hang my hat on the 116-million who voted less then 18-months ago.


38 posted on 03/08/2006 8:50:29 AM PST by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Bullseye.

If I may plagiarize Tony Snow's comments from this am to underscore the point, b___s___ stories like Katrina, civil war in Iraq and Tom Delay going down in an avalanche of GOP ethics troubles hit the front page for a week or more.

The corrections, if they ever do come (or, in the case of Delay's decisive victory) are relegated to page 8F under the used car sale ad.

At that point, the damage is done, and the drip-drip-drip begins to take hold.

The Old Media is fading, but they still have an effect, especially when they're operating at full bore anti-GOP/anti-GWB, as they have since 2000.

39 posted on 03/08/2006 8:50:38 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All

No here is why his poll numbers are down:

  1. Iraq (media): the media has been succeeding at presenting nothing but doom and gloom and see this war as Vietnam Redux
  2. Iraq (policy): Bush has made some serious errors in his conduct of the war including his attempt to fight the war in the media (see #1)
  3. Spending: if we wanted to see runaway Federal spending and massive increases in social-welfare programs we would have voted for the democrats
  4. Ports: no way in hell should Bush have even remotely come out in favor of this deal
  5. Domestic Wiretapping: Bush allowed the Dems/media to tag this program incorrectly and hasn't called anyone to the carpet about the leak (he seems weak against the CIA and State Department)
  6. Communication: Bush needs to talk to the American people as much as possible to set the record straight against media and Dem distortions.

40 posted on 03/08/2006 8:50:47 AM PST by jbenedic2 (Nothing new for the New York Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson