Why bother; there will always be an abundance of bible toting people who thrive on ignorance.
Have at it my friends....
There is no question that at least aspects of evolutionary theory are useful
in trying to understand embryology, genetics, and paleolithic evidence
No branch of evolutionary thought or theory has yet to
usefully address the origin of life or
the emergence of "Reason".
Efforts to date are deeply flawed and easy to discount
This is not say that future thought will correct this, but that they
are intrinsically difficult questions.
By resorting to the use of reason in studying the universe
We are bound by the limitations of the process
"Reason" does not lend itself to studying itself
Reason cannot explain reason (circular logic)
Kant's Critique of Pure Reason Kant himself struggled with this problem
and was forced to accept the presence of "Reason"
in humans as an "A Priori" finding
Useful, present, but unexplainable
Some might say that there is irreducible complexity
to these questions without resorting to an external frame of reference
If by resorting to an external frame of reference (Religion/Philosophy)
to do so is helpful, It should be also treated as useful until more complete data is present