Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Impeachment Agenda - Russ Feingold reveals what many Democrats really want.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008091 ^

Posted on 03/15/2006 11:07:22 AM PST by MikeA

Republicans are denouncing Senator Russ Feingold's proposal to "censure" President Bush for his warrantless wiretaps on al Qaeda, but we'd like to congratulate the Wisconsin Democrat on his candor. He's had the courage to put on the table what Democrats are all but certain to do if they win either the House or Senate in November.

In fact, our guess is that censure would be the least of it. The real debate in Democratic circles would be whether to pass articles of impeachment. Whether such an inevitable attempt succeeds would depend on Mr. Bush's approval rating, and especially on whether Democrats could use their subpoena power as committee chairs to conjure up something they could flog to a receptive media as an "impeachable" offense. But everyone should understand that censure and impeachment are important--and so far the only--parts of the left's agenda for the next Congress.

As a legal matter, Mr. Feingold's censure proposal is preposterous. The National Security Agency wiretaps were disclosed to Congressional leaders, including Democrats, from the start. The lead FISA court judges were also informed, and the Attorney General and Justice lawyers have monitored the wiretaps all along. Despite a media drumbeat about "illegal domestic eavesdropping," Mr. Bush's spirited defense of the program since news of it leaked has swung public opinion in support.

But as a political matter, the Wisconsin Senator knows exactly what he's doing. He knows that anti-Bush pathology runs so deep among many Democrats that they really do think they're living in some new dictatorship. Liberal journals solemnly debate impeachment, and political-action groups have formed to promote it. One of our leading left-wing newspapers recently compared Mr. Bush to J. Edgar Hoover and Richard Nixon, as if there were even a speck of evidence that this White House is wiretapping its political enemies.

When the fever gets this hot in supposedly mainstream forums, Mr. Feingold is right to conclude that the facts behind any censure or impeachment motion won't really matter. All that will count is the politics, which means it will come down to a question of votes in Congress. And several leading Democrats have already raised the "impeachment" card.

California Senator Barbara Boxer loudly wrote four legal scholars late last year asking if the NSA wiretaps were impeachable. John Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has introduced a resolution calling for the creation of a "select committee to investigate the administration's intent to go to war before congressional authorization, manipulation of pre-war intelligence, encouraging and countenancing torture, retaliating against critics, and to make recommendations regarding grounds for possible impeachment."

In other words, everything that Mr. Bush has been accused of during the last five years, no matter how Orwellian or thoroughly refuted, will be trotted out again and used as impeachment fodder.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; dncstrategy; feingold; sillydems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: littleleaguemom

your Fuhrer so sweetly portrayed on your homepage. And yes, I have been here A LOT longer than you have.


You being here "A lot longer" doesn't make you right. Your ridiculous comments are what matters, not how long you've been on Free Republic spouting the Pat Buchanan line. Talk about a Fuehrer, let's talk about the Jew hater, Saddam loving Buchanan...


41 posted on 03/15/2006 12:12:50 PM PST by MikeA (In the 2008 presidential election, the GOP cannot hope to beat a superstar with a dimbulb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cmotormac44

I am too. But I get suspicious of anyone from this moron state as well. This state is one big seething cancer of wrong-headedness.


42 posted on 03/15/2006 12:13:38 PM PST by MikeA (In the 2008 presidential election, the GOP cannot hope to beat a superstar with a dimbulb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom

I don't care if you are as old as dirt. You are posting like a dog butt sniffing troll.


43 posted on 03/15/2006 12:13:56 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Dear Congressmoron.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom
Bush/Cheney are going the way of Nixon/Agnew. The sooner we get rid of them the sooner we can save 2008.




Are you still living in that cave from the Nixon era???
44 posted on 03/15/2006 12:14:15 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

If you are serious, I think Cheney is going to have the same legal problems Libby has. Cheney could quietly resign and be replaced by Bush with someone squeaky clean. I think Bush has to address the wiretapping matter NOW before this goes any further. It is a very serious problem that most on FR are blowing off and has nothing to do with national security, just Nixon-esque enemies list stuff. Hastert has some ethical problems that haven't been publicized much but certainly will be if impeachment talk goes any further.


45 posted on 03/15/2006 12:16:05 PM PST by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom

Well...we have freepers that have been "underground" over at DU for years also...doesn't make them a DUmmie.

So...just cause you signed up in 1998...doesn't make you a conservative, Republican OR freeper.


46 posted on 03/15/2006 12:18:12 PM PST by Txsleuth (Bush-Bot;WaterBucket Brigader;and fan of defconw;Cboldt is my mentor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom
You say Bush is struggling to turn things around. Unfortunately, most of these disasters were his personal creations. When he has the guts to say the war is "over" for whatever reasons he chooses, and bring everyone home maybe his approval numbers will go from 34% to 42%.



Well, well, I did NOT know that "mother" sheeehaan had a sister???
47 posted on 03/15/2006 12:19:03 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
pI am too. But I get suspicious of anyone from this moron state as well. This state is one big seething cancer of wrong-headedness.

LOL, now you are profiling my state, home of the great Ronald Reagan himself? I live in Republican San Diego with no Congressman because he is in jail for taking bribes. I don't want Bush to be a screw-up, but he is and the sooner we deal with it the better off we will be.

48 posted on 03/15/2006 12:19:58 PM PST by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom

"I can see you have no interest in anything except worshipping your Fuhrer so sweetly portrayed on your homepage."

Oh boy.


49 posted on 03/15/2006 12:20:44 PM PST by Avenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom

I can see you have no interest in anything except worshipping your Fuhrer so sweetly portrayed on your homepage. And yes, I have been here A LOT longer than you have.

Ahhhh...one of those "Bush is Hitler" arseclowns.

We have drug-induced Islamopigs spouting daily that they want to kill us/force YOU to wear a black sack/want to kill jews, etc. Who would you trust to run the country? The current tenant or the party of Cindy Shee-hadi?


50 posted on 03/15/2006 12:20:57 PM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom

Cheney could quietly resign and be replaced by Bush with someone squeaky clean. I think Bush has to address the wiretapping matter NOW before this goes any further. It is a very serious problem that most on FR are blowing off and has nothing to do with national security, just Nixon-esque enemies list stuff.

First of all, according to the Washington Post from yesterday it was Richard Armitage who was the originator of the Plame leak, something that wasn't illegal in any event since she was just a pencil pusher at Langley and wasn't a field agent with cover status.

Second, you have ZERO evidence and none has even been suggested that the president wiretapped his political opponents. Even the head of this program at the NSA has said these are all Al Qaeda targets and they are rigorous in ensuring the people whose phones are tapped are people against whom there are serious reasons to believe they are intertwined with Al Qaeda.

Man, you are REALLY a victim of the Bush bashing news media. It shows in everything you post, even to such an extent that you've bought into the "domestic wiretapping" lie when this is an international wiretap program tapping phone calls from known Al Qaeda operatives coming from abroad to people here in the states. GET INFORMED!


51 posted on 03/15/2006 12:21:49 PM PST by MikeA (In the 2008 presidential election, the GOP cannot hope to beat a superstar with a dimbulb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Yea .. that one caught my attention a few months back


52 posted on 03/15/2006 12:22:25 PM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom
I doubt Bush could get somebody good through Senate confirmation process. Cheney was elected to his office, and it smacks of banana republic to simply replace high office-holders because things look like they might get rough. Really, your scenario is more like Nazi Germany than you apparently realize.

I cast a vote with every expectation the people I am voting for will fulfill the terms of their offices. That's a very high bar to jump, and I don't see it happening, Jonathon Turley's opinion notwithstanding.

53 posted on 03/15/2006 12:23:12 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Ah, figures. There seems to be an acute shortage of duct tape for littleleaguemom's head today.


54 posted on 03/15/2006 12:24:00 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Dear Congressmoron.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

Cindy is trashed by the Democrats. She has a few pals in the black caucus and such but that is it. The Boxer conned her out of running against Feinstein. That would have been hilarious as the Feinstein has no Republican opposition and thinks she is Senatress for Life. Did you know about her husband's war booty? He has huge contracts in Iraq. Some left-wing guy in SF wrote a big expose on it. I am sure they helped buy DF's new $16.5 million mansion.


55 posted on 03/15/2006 12:24:44 PM PST by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Avenger
Who was it that came up with this rule of thumb:

"Whoever first compares his opponent to Hitler automatically loses the argument."

56 posted on 03/15/2006 12:25:48 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2006, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: littleleaguemom

LOL, now you are profiling my state, home of the great Ronald Reagan himself? I live in Republican San Diego with no Congressman because he is in jail for taking bribes. I don't want Bush to be a screw-up, but he is and the sooner we deal with it the better off we will be.

I'm from this state, so stop acting like this is some unfair assault on California from an outsider. If you live here then you should know it's not been anything like the state of Ronald Reagan since the early 90s. If you believe Ronald Reagan could get elected to this state today with the leftist trash that have taken it over, then you're deluded. Schwarzenegger himself who brought this state back from the brink of disaster will probably lose his governor's race to some unknown fool like Angelides or that other hack. We couldn't even get basic reforms passed here in November like sane legislative districts and increasing teacher tenure. Wake up.

And no, Bush isn't a screw up. You are for being deceived by the media and the Democrats. Come on, own up. You've become a Democrat haven't you, like Arriane Huffington another good little California girl who got seduced by the sick political environment of this god-forsaken state.


57 posted on 03/15/2006 12:26:14 PM PST by MikeA (In the 2008 presidential election, the GOP cannot hope to beat a superstar with a dimbulb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

great post--why anyone would believe an 'ad' or tv commercial from a political group or union, without an attempt to find the "real truth", is beyond me---just like the 'ports deal' that was taken over by the "rats" as an issue who ran with it---when did 'hitlery or chuckie' ever defend anything of value for our nation?--then the chicken-shit 'rhinos' jumped in and all the stupid people came on board as well---I hope they shut down our bases and throw us out of the UAE for the insult we gave to those who would help in the area---Free Republic has more than its share of loons, Bush haters, and gutless citizens who flop back and forth, so don't believe all you read here--


58 posted on 03/15/2006 12:27:30 PM PST by cmotormac44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Man, you are REALLY a victim of the Bush bashing news media. It shows in everything you post, even to such an extent that you've bought into the "domestic wiretapping" lie when this is an international wiretap program tapping phone calls from known Al Qaeda operatives coming from abroad to people here in the states. GET INFORMED!

Sorry, you need to get informed. The NSA has already admitted to spying on Quakers, antiwar folks, etc and that no one they spied on was actually a terrorist. Moreover, the criminal Duke Cunningham's "co-conspirators" were actually front companies for CIFA, Pentagon intelligence. In other words, they weren't happy with their huge budget, so they bribed Duke into getting them some bogus contracts so they would have even more loot for domestic spying. Duke is so dumb he had no idea they were front companies.

59 posted on 03/15/2006 12:29:01 PM PST by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

I will never be a Democrat. They showed how worthless they were over the bogus ports matter. But of course Duncan Hunter right here was a ringleader in making Bush look like an ass on one of the few times he was totally correct. The Democrat candidate for Duke's seat totally blew it when they gave her the opportunity to do the weekly radio address and she spitted out ports propaganda.


60 posted on 03/15/2006 12:32:01 PM PST by littleleaguemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson