Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GALLUP POLLING DROPS CNN AFTER 'LOW RATINGS'; FULL MEMO REVEALED
Drudge Report ^ | March 21, 2006

Posted on 03/21/2006 4:43:24 PM PST by RWR8189

GALLUP POLLING DROPS CNN AFTER 'LOW RATINGS'; FULL MEMO REVEALED
Tue Mar 21 2006 19:01:37 ET

The GALLUP polling company has dropped CNN as its outlet for electronic distribution.

GALLUP, CNN and USA TODAY have been polling partners since 1992.

"CNN has far fewer viewers than it did in the past, and we feel that our brand was getting lost and diluted," GALLUP claimed in an internal memo, obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT.

CNN tells TVNEWSER.COM, which first reported the split: "We want to make it clear that the decision to not renew our polling arrangement had to do with GALLUP's desire to produce their own broadcasts and not about CNN viewership figures. In fact, GALLUP had negotiated with us for four months in an effort to extend the partnership."

**EXCLUSIVE**The full memo, by Jim Clifton, Chairman & CEO of GALLUP:

We have chosen "not" to renew our contract with CNN.

We have had a great partnership with CNN but it is not the right alignment for our future. The longtime partnership has been very helpful to The Gallup Poll as it put us "back big" fifteen years ago when our famous Gallup Poll had lost most of its national coverage. Our CNN partnership helped us make a great comeback. We had a great run as we just cut our 4000th segment this week.

The Gallup Poll will go on with more polling than ever, but with new distribution channels.

WHY. 1) CNN has far fewer viewers than it did in the past and we feel that our brand was getting lost and diluted combined with the CNN brand. We have only about 200 thousand viewers during our CNN segments.

2) We are creating our own e-broadcasting programs and we don't want to be married to one broadcast network. We don't want to move to another network like CBS or Fox but rather become our own network. We cannot do this while married to CNN.

3) By dissolving our partnership with CNN we believe that Frank and other Gallup analysts will be seen as more independent so they will be more likely to be invited on a wide variety of television shows rather than primarily linked to CNN. We believe with this new found independence, we will get covered by more broadcast media because we are not the poll of their competitor.

4) We have enthusiastically renewed our print partner, USA Today. They have arguably the best readership of any newspaper in the world. It has approximately 2.4 mil subscriptions and 7.5 mil readers per day. Far more than the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal. And it has substantial international coverage for being a US paper. We also believe that print is a much needed way to present our polls for those interested in studying a chart or reading analysis.

In the big picture, USA Today supplies more than 10x the users per day than CNN. USA Today is our 800lb paperboy. Or the primary distributor of The Gallup Poll. We want to have two primary distribution channels. 1) USA Today and 2) e-Gallup News. We will go on any regular TV show for guest appearances because it will help build our e-viewership. We also will be featured on AOL's front page for news. The AOL e-distribution will likely add more eyeballs per day than all of CNN.

This is a big move for us. We have to boldly change and invent new futures for Gallup or we will not survive the hurricane of competition coming from all directions in everything we do. I personally proposed the deal to Ted Turner about fifteen years ago while backstage at a "People's Choice" event and then again at their headquarters in Atlanta. It has been a great partnership and one that has meant a lot to this CEO. One in which we have all been very proud and one where we delivered our very best work every week. We have offered to help CNN find a new polling partner and to be as helpful as we can during this transition.

Jim

END



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biasmeanslayoffs; cnn; dinosaurmedia; drudge; gallup; msm; msmwoes; polls; trysellingthetruth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: =Intervention=; adam_az; an amused spectator; bert; BlessedBeGod; BlessedByLiberty; Blurblogger; ...

Based on an amused spectator's list
Send FReepmail if you want on/off MSP list
The List of Ping Lists

41 posted on 03/21/2006 5:19:39 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milhous; kcvl; Mo1; Miss Marple; Coop; Grampa Dave; deport; onyx; EveningStar

Great compilation, Milhous!


42 posted on 03/21/2006 5:22:15 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky

'Gallup To Sever Ties With CNN, No Viewers'.Will this be Bill Schneider's 'Play of the week'?


43 posted on 03/21/2006 5:23:34 PM PST by Maumee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


44 posted on 03/21/2006 5:23:39 PM PST by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

You know, when I show that picture to people, they just do not believe it's real.


45 posted on 03/21/2006 5:24:25 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OkeyDokeyOkie
Here's a laffer for you - this thumbsucking dunce worries about the fate of 'lil people purging elite dictators who want to tell 'lil people what to think.
Web 2.0 Is Reminiscent Of Marx

Without an elite mainstream media, we will lose our memory for things learnt, read, experienced, or heard. The cultural consequences of this are dire, requiring the authoritative voice of at least an Allan Bloom, if not an Oswald Spengler. But here in Silicon Valley, on the brink of the Web 2.0 epoch, there no longer are any Blooms or Spenglers. All we have is the great seduction of citizen media, democratized content and authentic online communities. And weblogs, course. Millions and millions of blogs.

46 posted on 03/21/2006 5:26:54 PM PST by Milhous (Sarcasm - the last refuge of an empty mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

How's Fox' ratings doin???

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


47 posted on 03/21/2006 5:27:08 PM PST by bray (Proud Bushbot for 6 years going on 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I can't recall the title of the thread or his name.

I scanned your posting history for "cnn" and found this in about 30 seconds.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1599780/posts?page=50#50

48 posted on 03/21/2006 5:27:44 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

**"CNN has far fewer viewers than it did in the past, and we feel that our brand was getting lost and diluted," GALLUP claimed in an internal memo, obtained by the DRUDGE REPORT.**

Well, duh! Who would watch them anyway?


49 posted on 03/21/2006 5:29:13 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

LOL!
I scanned my posting history for about 5 minutes and decided I a whole lot and gave up my search!


50 posted on 03/21/2006 5:29:52 PM PST by onyx (Bush/Cheney '08 --- by coup if necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jcs2



Well, what say you now?


51 posted on 03/21/2006 5:30:24 PM PST by onyx (Bush/Cheney '08 --- by coup if necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I think the conversation went like this: Gallup, invoking the spirit of Cartman from "South Park," said "Screw you, hippies!!!"


52 posted on 03/21/2006 5:31:16 PM PST by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Put a bandaid on that.


53 posted on 03/21/2006 5:33:58 PM PST by Bassfan (No cheese please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I scanned my posting history for about 5 minutes ...

Well, I didn't really "scan" it - I usef the Ctl-F (or equivalent) search function. The first page had a couple hits from your posts in the last hours or so, the second page had none, etc. It doesn't take long when "not reading for content" ;-)

Anyway, not sure if that's the conversation you had in mind, but it seemed to resemble a "how ratings are determined" sort of thing.

54 posted on 03/21/2006 5:36:55 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt


Bless you. It's the right conversation!


55 posted on 03/21/2006 5:38:19 PM PST by onyx (Bush/Cheney '08 --- by coup if necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I am glad CNN does not operate our Air Force or missile forces. Wrong country can get bombed by them!!! LOL


56 posted on 03/21/2006 5:42:28 PM PST by Fee (`+Great powers never let minor allies dictate who, where and when they must fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; Howlin

Thanks for "Galluping" in here with this. :)


57 posted on 03/21/2006 5:42:31 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Does this mean Bill Schneider is out of a job?


58 posted on 03/21/2006 5:48:41 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I wish I could recall the poster's name from yesterday or the day before who posted that CNN's ratings beat the other cable's.

You misunderstood, they said rantings not ratings.
59 posted on 03/21/2006 5:50:02 PM PST by Tiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Does that mean the ridiculously-biased ball headed dude ever present on CNN will not be gleefully reporting anti-Bush poll news every hour and trying to steer elections toward the RATS?


60 posted on 03/21/2006 5:56:48 PM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson