Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOOP: WHO ARE THE WHINY KIDS?
Michelle Malkin ^ | March 23, 2006 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 03/23/2006 5:29:48 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter

An anonymous tipster sends some intriguing information about the "whiny kids grow up to be conservatives" study conducted by left-wing UC Berkeley prof Jack Block.

Wondering where the nursery school kids who were the subjects of the study came from? Check this out:

I know exactly which "nursery school" was used as the basis of this study. It is not mentioned anywhere in the text of the 16-page pdf you provided for downloading, but I know because -- well, because I know people who were some of the subjects of this study (and of other similar studies). And an extremely important fact about this school renders the entire study false. The nursery school cited is actually the "Harold E. Jones Child Study Center," on Atherton St. in Berkeley. It used to have a different name if I remember -- I think it used to be called the "Atherton Child Study Center."

Go to this URL to see their Web site.

If you want proof that this is indeed the school used for the study, go to this URL.

This page is part of the "Institute for Human Development," which is the department at Cal which runs the school. It is part of and connected to the Child Study Center site link above. About halfway down on this page (search for "Jack Block") you'll see that they mention that the data gathering part of this study was done at the Center:

"A renowned longitudinal study of development originated by Jeanne and Jack Block began with children at three and followed them at 4, 5, 7, 11, 14 18, and 23 years of age."

Compare that to this text from the final study (in the pdf):

Pre-school children subsequently relatively conservative at age 23

What is so significant about this? Well, the Harold E. Jones Child Study Center is only open to children of U.C. Berkeley faculty and staff:

The University Preschool offers full-day developmental child care for preschool-aged children of UCB faculty and staff.

(The "Preschool" is a subset of the "Child Study Center.")

In other words, ALL of the children in that study were the offspring of U.C. Berkeley professors, lecturers, and staff members.

The reason the Child Study Center is so popular is that they offer free/cheap child care/nursery schooling in exchange for the parents allowing their kids to be "studied" by psychologists all day every day.

And here's the clincher (you probably already saw it coming):

UC Berkeley faculty was rated the most left-wing in the country: 91% of teachers there were classified as liberal:

"University of California, Berkeley (91 percent liberal)."

So, we have documented proof that the "whiny babies" in this study were basically ALL the children of liberal parents.

With this fact in hand, we can completely turn the study around:

Firstly, it was the liberal parents that made their kids whiny to begin with.

Secondly, it could just as easily be argued that, even at a very early age, some kids don't get along with their parents, and so become "whiny." Then, when those kids grow older, they rebel against their parents, as a way of disassociating themselves from their parents' influence. And if your parents are liberal (as they all were in this study), then you rebel by becoming a conservative!

That's it for the documented-facts part of the scoop. But on a more informal, anecdotal level: I have personally witnessed what goes on at the Child Study Center (or what went on there several years ago - I'm sure it's the same today, as its mission has not changed):

Toddlers and young children (generally aged between 2 and 5) frolic around and do activities as in any day care/nursery school/kindergarten setting. But the difference is there are adult researchers (some even with the proverbial clipboards) hovering around at all times, monitoring the kids, "observing" their behavior, writing down little notes and filling out charts about the kids' personalities and activities and so on.

And here's the key, from my personal observation: the researchers get it all wrong! They often have some esoteric psychological/behavioral academic fad they're trying to prove, so they ascribe the most bizarre and ludicrous motivations for the kids' actions, scribbling notes about "ego resilience" and "crypto-sexual manifestations" and blah blah blah. It would be comical if if wasn't taken so seriously. I can assure you that whatever data they gathered in the '60s or '70s about how "whiny" these kids were was totally bogus and off-the-mark.

Maybe they were whiny because they were more intellectually developed than the other kids and were frustrated in an overly infantile environment. Maybe they were whiny because the "counselors" detected early indications of independent thought and action in these kids, and forced them to conform to their Socialist ideals, causing the future conservatives to feel resentful.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berkeley; block; conservatives; liberals; malkin; npr; psychobabble; torontostar; whiny
Another fiasco for mainstream media.
1 posted on 03/23/2006 5:29:50 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
The reason the Child Study Center is so popular is that they offer free/cheap child care/nursery schooling in exchange for the parents allowing their kids to be "studied" by psychologists all day every day.
2 posted on 03/23/2006 5:31:25 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Related thread from earlier today.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1601500/posts


3 posted on 03/23/2006 5:32:02 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (Ignorance is contageous and has lots of friends while wisdom is often a lonely fellow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Great work by Michelle.


4 posted on 03/23/2006 5:32:08 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Another researcher proves to be a left wing crank with no real grasp of scientific methodology. I think I just described almost every sociology dept in the country (sorry, Herr Weber, it has come to this).


5 posted on 03/23/2006 5:34:05 PM PST by giobruno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

This thread is now in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws.

6 posted on 03/23/2006 5:38:24 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Unlike the MSM, it looks like our babe Michelle actually does some REAL journalism.


7 posted on 03/23/2006 5:39:08 PM PST by MediaAnalyst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

"In other words, ALL of the children in that study were the offspring of U.C. Berkeley professors, lecturers, and staff members."


8 posted on 03/23/2006 5:39:12 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Moreover, if these kids are only 23 now, it's a bit too soon to say how they "turned out." At 23 I was quite the strutting little leftie, just brimming with sneering superiority toward all the evil rich and the stupid country folk who voted Republican. I didn't start learning about actual conservative philosophy till I came to Free Republic. And I was 33 then.


9 posted on 03/23/2006 5:43:16 PM PST by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
Great article. At a liberal school in a liberal neighborhood, conservatives will be the complainers. Liberals will be the complainers at a conservative or fundamentalist or traditionalist school. Basic personality doesn't have much to do with it.

It's incredible that the professor didn't get it, but emotions usually rule when professors talk about politics. This sort of research is pretty worthless, because how we should act politically depends a lot on practical circumstances, rather than abstract ideas or personality types.

Though ideologues like to deny it, there are times, if only once in a generation, when the sort of person one doesn't like may well get it right about some issue, so writing off one set of emotions or reactions or ideas or personality traits entirely is foolish.

10 posted on 03/23/2006 5:43:32 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
And I was 33 then.

So now you're...

carry the two...

OMG

=)

11 posted on 03/23/2006 5:46:14 PM PST by SquirrelKing (Contrary to popular belief, America is not a democracy, it is a Chucktatorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
Good research by Michelle.

One can certainly tell the difference between a conservative raised by conservatives vs. the "new conservatives" raised by libs. Worlds apart in my estimation and, sadly, they have the megaphone for the time being.

12 posted on 03/23/2006 5:48:53 PM PST by Eagleami (Israeli Hero - Moses Hess - Communist Manifesto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz

Not me. I was born conservative.
But sometimes a "convert" is more passionate. Consider the ex-smoker.....


13 posted on 03/23/2006 5:49:24 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (Ignorance is contageous and has lots of friends while wisdom is often a lonely fellow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

She's a sweety for sure. What is her ethnic background?


14 posted on 03/23/2006 5:50:09 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (Ignorance is contageous and has lots of friends while wisdom is often a lonely fellow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
And if your parents are liberal (as they all were in this study), then you rebel by becoming a conservative!

What conservative kid wouldn't be whining if they were stuck with radical Berkley leftist parents?

15 posted on 03/23/2006 5:58:25 PM PST by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz

Yeah, if these kids came from liberal parents and are showing signs of conservatism in their early twenties, we are making some serious progress!


16 posted on 03/23/2006 5:59:34 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

There are days that I thank God for Michelle Malkin. This day and artice is one of them.


17 posted on 03/23/2006 5:59:56 PM PST by abner (Looking for a new tagline- Next outrage please!- Got it! PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS LOST IN THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abner

artice = article...

Duh!


18 posted on 03/23/2006 6:00:29 PM PST by abner (Looking for a new tagline- Next outrage please!- Got it! PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS LOST IN THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: abner

"There are days that I thank God for Michelle Malkin. This day and artice is one of them."


The real scary thought is all the garbage spewed by the mainstream media prior to blogs and free republic.


19 posted on 03/23/2006 6:10:10 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

Not to undermine Malkin's piece, but I have to ask this: were Berkeley's faculty members in the 1960s and 1970s were as liberal as they are today, or --comparatively-- more conservative? The 90% liberals, was it also applied to the past? I know about the students movement there during that period, but am not sure about the professors/staff.


20 posted on 03/23/2006 6:10:55 PM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
crypto-sexual manifestation

ping

Now THATS a disease I can relate to.......

21 posted on 03/23/2006 6:15:40 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes
Philipino
22 posted on 03/23/2006 6:32:38 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Why did Allah create free will and then demand submission? Wouldn't robots have been easier?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter

"In other words, ALL of the children in that study were the offspring of U.C. Berkeley professors, lecturers, and staff members."

No wonder some were whiny; look where they learned it...


23 posted on 03/23/2006 7:17:58 PM PST by Altamira (Get the UN out of the US, and the US out of the UN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Presbyterian Reporter
crypto-sexual manifestation

Ah-ha. For me, epiphany time :)

24 posted on 03/23/2006 9:11:44 PM PST by upchuck (Wikipedia.com - the most unbelievable web site in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson