Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just Fun, or Art? A Real Tossup [Camera Tossing!]
Newhouse News ^ | 4/7/2006 | Fran Henry

Posted on 04/10/2006 1:07:42 PM PDT by Incorrigible

This image was captured by setting a digital camera at a slow shutter speed and tossing it into the air inside a shopping mall food court. (Photo by Thomas Ondrey)

Just Fun, or Art? A Real Tossup

BY FRAN HENRY

Picture this. You are at a lame party, but you can't leave because it's at your house.

We offer this solution to your problem: Grab your digital camera, set the shutter speed real slow -- at one second or in night mode -- and prepare to dazzle the crowd before it disperses out of boredom.


With a flourish, you will demonstrate the wondrous world of camera tossing, in which your digital camera takes interesting pictures more or less on its own.

Here's what you'll do at this hypothetical party that's going south:

After you depress the shutter button, you toss your camera 2 or 3 feet into the air and catch it before it lands. It is crucial that you catch the camera or somehow cushion its landing. You could have your chubbiest friends lie on the ground, hip to hip, and toss the camera above them. Or maybe not.

While the camera is on its own, it will take a picture. And this is what you'll show your guests, and maybe even let them try, too -- at least the ones who still are able to catch moving objects.

Who thought of this? Lots of people, probably, but a 28-year-old Texan named Ryan Gallagher, a theatrical lighting specialist, put his camera-toss pictures on Flickr.com, a photo-sharing Web site. As a community of fellow camera tossers formed, he created a Web log, cameratoss.blogspot.com, for the camera tossers' pictures.

Word got around quickly, and Gallagher was offered a gallery show in Hamburg, Germany. He figures he first tossed his camera Aug. 20, and his exhibit opened Jan. 4.

And Gallagher was there, his first trip to Europe, subsidized in part by the online Der Spiegel, a German newsmagazine.

"It was standing room only," Gallagher said in a cell-phone conversation.

He was sitting at a sidewalk coffee shop in Austin, Texas, his words blurred slightly by passing traffic. Six of his 23 prints sold for about 200 euros each, or about $240.

Naturally someone groused that Gallagher had shot his pictures with a cheap digital, but that was the worst of the criticism, he said. Indeed, it was a cheap digital, a Vivitar with a cracked LCD, but it already was cracked when a friend gave it to him.

His show apparently was well received, because the gallery extended it another three weeks. Gallagher said an exhibit in Berlin is also in the planning stages, a show he'll share with Ottmar Hoerl, a German artist who has made photographs with cameras hurled from a nine-story building.

While Gallagher is pleased that he sold some prints, money isn't his main interest.

"I gave away my technique right away. If I had been interested in making money, I would have kept my technique to myself," he said, then paused, "and it probably wouldn't have gone anywhere." He laughed.

"It would be nice if artists could make money doing art," he said.


But are his pictures art?

"Tossing can only be considered art, although there's a lot of application in graphic art," he said. "I've had a lot of inquiries to use my images in graphic design." (See his work at his Web site, kineticphotography.net.)

Cleveland photographer and photo historian Herb Ascherman is happy -- make that delighted -- that Gallagher doesn't call his work photography.

"Some gorgeous pictures, I admit," he said upon viewing Gallagher's work at his Web site. "But photography is a communicative art. It portrays a thought or emotion."

Besides, Ascherman said, "we were doing this stuff before these guys were born. We used to get stoned and put the camera on the dashboard and drive. Big deal."

Maybe camera tossing can be called a kind of performance art, Cleveland commercial photographer Barney Taxel said.

"I suppose it does reflect a little of the culture when one is willing to toss a camera into the air and risk its destruction," he said.

And that's another thing you can tell your guests while they're cushioning your camera's fall. 

HOW IT'S DONE

Here are the basics of camera tossing. For more detailed instruction, go to cameratoss.blogspot.com, the Web site of Ryan Gallagher, an expert in the technique.

Get a cheap digital camera, and select an area with a light source.

Set the shutter speed for a second or two, or use night mode, if it's easier to set.

If you don't trust your ability to catch the camera as it falls, secure it to your wrist with a cord or pad the landing area.

Hit the shutter just as you toss the camera into the air -- a couple feet will do. Toss with a flick of your wrist. Here's where a lightweight camera works best.

Catch the camera, and look at your photo. Erase it if it's not interesting, and try again.

April 7, 2006

(Fran Henry is a reporter for The Plain Dealer of Cleveland. She can be contacted at fhenry@plaind.com.)
 

Not for commercial use.  For educational and discussion purposes only.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Tired of threads that

1) Make accusations against other FReepers and FR moderators
2) Cause people to wonder if humans have evolved or were influenced Divinely in anyway
3) Slander or pander to President Bush

Then this is the fun thread for you!

 

1 posted on 04/10/2006 1:07:44 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
The swirling patterns in this image were created by tossing a camera up underneath a trade show booth awning festooned with flashing red and yellow lights. (Photo by Thomas Ondrey)

2 posted on 04/10/2006 1:08:51 PM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
It is crucial that you catch the camera or somehow cushion its landing.

The lawyers made them say that.

3 posted on 04/10/2006 1:09:03 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

LOL, and yes!

This is actually pretty cool.


4 posted on 04/10/2006 1:12:24 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (How inna heck can I wash my neck, when it ain't gonna rain no more - (wishful thinking!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Bunch of tossers. :-)


5 posted on 04/10/2006 1:13:44 PM PDT by Riley ("What color is the boathouse at Hereford?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Whatever happened to stealthly taking other peoples cameras and taking the "moon shot" for the unsuspecting owner?

Seems the best fads always fade quickly.


6 posted on 04/10/2006 1:15:45 PM PDT by IamConservative (Who does not trust a man of principle? A man who has none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
It's art!

(This print available for $100.)
7 posted on 04/10/2006 1:15:45 PM PDT by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Also, try pointing a camera at an overactive child sometime, on long exposure. I used to think this ruined my shots of my nephews, until I realized that the shots captured the motion and energy of children.

Art is in the eye, even a digital eye.


8 posted on 04/10/2006 1:16:57 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
I'm not a fan of Picasso. However ... a Picasso is pretty recognizably a Picasso. A Van Gogh is easy to spot as a Van Gogh.

I am also not a fan of Jackson Pollack. But either he was an artist, or he was lucky. If he was lucky, then the man who puts a drop cloth under a flock of pigeons may be equally "lucky". If we consider Jackson Pollack an artist (and most people do) then we recognize that he brought "something special" with him when he approached his work.

"Camera Tossing" results are either good or bad a matter of luck. The results are not recognizably attributable to a particular "artist". There's nothing special here.

I'm tired of art that can be done by anyone.

9 posted on 04/10/2006 1:18:39 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

bttt


10 posted on 04/10/2006 1:19:09 PM PDT by petercooper (Cemeteries & the ignorant - comprising 2 of the largest Democrat voting blocs for the past 75 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

Now that our intrepid reporter has discovered cameratoss perhaps she can go on to enlighten us on the history of LoMo photography.


11 posted on 04/10/2006 1:20:24 PM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

If you leave the cap on you get results like this

12 posted on 04/10/2006 1:23:36 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

At least they're not tossing salads.


13 posted on 04/10/2006 1:27:02 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Unfettered gun ownership is the highest expression of civil rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
Give the camera to this little dude and you'll get Dwarf Camera Tossing!


14 posted on 04/10/2006 1:27:59 PM PDT by FReepaholic (I was FReepin' when FReepin' wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Interesting effect.

Think I'll try to figure a method to achieve it - one that doesn't involve throwing $1500 into the air.


15 posted on 04/10/2006 1:28:08 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
...At least they're not tossing salads...

Yeah, but if you look at these photos long enough you'll be tossing your cookies.

16 posted on 04/10/2006 1:28:56 PM PDT by FReepaholic (I was FReepin' when FReepin' wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
"...one that doesn't involve throwing $1500 into the air."

If you want to toss about $120 about 1300' in the air, click here.

17 posted on 04/10/2006 1:31:31 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

None of these accidental pics compare to the worst sunset.


18 posted on 04/10/2006 1:42:09 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible; Revolting cat!
Spin art for the 21st century.


19 posted on 04/10/2006 1:47:23 PM PDT by weegee ("CBS NEWS? Is that show still on?" - freedomson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic
Dwarf Bands Duel In Vegas (battle between 2 all-dwarf Kiss tribute bands threatens to turn violent) (April 10, 2006)
20 posted on 04/10/2006 1:49:04 PM PDT by weegee ("CBS NEWS? Is that show still on?" - freedomson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson