Gay Totalitarians Perverse Sex Education for Kids

In speaking of ‘gay identity’ politics, Tammy Bruce noted that the “Gay Gestapo” is ‘infuriated most when I declare that my sexuality is not an ‘orientation’ but my ‘preference.' Liberals are always shocked by her honest disclosures because the politically correct stance is that “we are all born this way.” “The silliness of this claim,” commented Tammy, “reinforces the main lie in the Leftist world—that none of us are responsible for our behavior, who we are, or what we become. This ‘gay from birth’ angle also makes it easier to argue for special protections.” The drive for special protections such as forced sensitivity and diversity training, speech codes, and hate crime laws requires homosexuality to be an “identity, as opposed to just a sliver of who we are,” said Tammy. Homosexuality is a “behavior,” noted Tammy, and there is “nothing that makes homosexuals different from anyone else except behavior choices.” “Claiming a gay identity,” declared Ms. Bruce, “is nothing more than a slogan to excuse one self from personal responsibility and personal control. It is the ultimate in individual abandonment.” (Source: “The New American Revolution” Tammy Bruce, pp. 234-235)

Identity politics are the evil spawn of ‘group theory’ (Stalinism). As such, it’s a key element of multiculturalism—the weapon of mass destruction being used by the Left to demolish every trace of traditional America.

“Gay identity politics” is therefore, just one of the many weapons in the Left’s ‘special rights groups’ arsenal. Consequently, gay identity is being used to destroy the traditional family as well as serving as a convenient excuse to separate children from their parents, thus enabling global village mind-conditioners to raise them. It’s also a handy excuse for forcing straights into psycho political mind conditioning sessions, otherwise known as sensitivity and diversity training. Thanks to the public’s naïve acceptance of the myth of sexual orientation queer activists are empowered in their agenda to eradicate our created condition as either male or female while simultaneously sensitizing Americans to accept something wholly unnatural—the twisted notion that they are genderless beings possessed of an ever-expanding range of sexual orientations. Sexual Orientations are collectively referred to as a sexual continuum.

What is sexual continuum? Gloria Filax, of the University of Manitoba revealed that it refers to polymorphously perverse sex. In an essay revelatory of the masochistic Left’s subversive intentions she wrote, “Chris Mayo argues that sex education would better serve children and adolescents if its practitioners attempted to disrupt foundational assumptions that children are (sexually) innocent.” Filax pointed to the “traditional family…propped up by generational differences and heteronormativity (the new racism)” as being the main “problems” which “impinge on our classrooms.” Using the reasoning of Alfred Kinsey, a sadomasochistic homosexual pedophile who declared that babies and children are sexual from birth, Filax stated that “sexuality begins when a child is born” and that “sexuality is polymorphously perverse.” Continuing on, Filax declared that, “we must support Chris Mayo’s conclusion that schools have a responsibility to provide Ob/Scene education; that is, safe sex education.” In a conclusion which clearly supports Ms. Bruce’s premise that “gay identity is…a slogan to excuse one self from personal responsibility and personal control,” Filax declares, “In this way we refocus ourselves in an age of HIV/AIDS as safely polymorphously perverse and control that which is deadly—HIV/AIDS—and not sexuality.” (Source: Ob/Scenely Polymorphously Perverse Sex Education, Gloria Filax, University of Manitoba, http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/97_docs/filax.html)

As Rush Limbaugh famously says: “You just can’t make this stuff up folks!”

Be that as it may, it’s precisely this sort of total abandonment to depravity that leads to this sort of evil: “a grotesque and disturbing pedophilic painting (was) prominently displayed (of) a baby boy lying naked on his back being sodomized by the nipple of a baby bottle.” (Source: “Turning girls into boys” Peter LaBarbera, WorldNetDaily.com, Feb. 2002)

The American Psychiatric Association is in lockstep with the Gay Totalitarians’ polymorphously perverse agenda. In May of 2003, the APA met in San Francisco to debate the normalization of such paraphilias as pedophilia, transvestism, fetishism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism. Dr. Charles Moser of the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality pompously puffed: “S/M practitioners have been victimized by society as a whole…” Of the utter derangement evidenced by the APA, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi, President of the National Association for the Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) observed: “It’s a measure of how low the psychiatric establishment has sunk, that it would even debate the idea that pedophilia, transvestism, and sadomasochism could ever be expressions of true human flourishing.” (Source: “Pedophiles/Sex Torturers Seek Normalization” Traditional Values Coalition)

The California Supreme Court is likewise aiding and abetting the Gay Totalitarians. In “California Supremes: Oral Sex with Kids is OK!” Kevin McCullough reported: “On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court voted 6 to 1 to not force those convicted of having oral sex with underage kids to register as sex offenders. The majority judges said…The law was ‘too harsh and unfair.” (Source: WorldNetDaily.com Mar. 10, 2006)

Goose-stepping under the Enlightenment banner: “God is dead, therefore we are at liberty to self-actualize as we please, and to do whatever we want,” criminally-minded Leftists for whom the most abhorrent erotic impulses serve as the mainspring of their lives, have taken command of our schools. In addition to dumbing-down American children, they are twisting their minds so as to condition them to hate their own country. Additionally, under the cloak of sensitivity and diversity training and sex education, Leftist deviants are grooming children to become degenerates and sex predators. This is one reason why America is experiencing a tidal wave of sex predation. Sex predators posing as teachers and other school administration officials are rutting on children and degenerate children are preying on other children.

Reading reports such as the following have become all too common in America: “I’ve never experienced the problems and the degenerate actions of kids as I have this past year,” said bus driver Bob Baxley of Hagerstown, MD who has been driving buses for 12 years.” (Source: As School Bus Sexual Attacks Rise, Danger Often Overlooked, staff writers, washingtonpost.com, June 14, 2005)

Repressive regimes of the past required that all people be submissive to state power. The totalitarianism of socialism differs in that not only does it force complete submission (annihilation of the autonomous individual) but it demands internal assent, meaning that freedom of conscience is criminalized.

Gay Totalitarians and their accomplices have seized control of our schools and they brook no interference or dissent from parents or anyone else for that matter. This was made clear by the arrest of David Parker, a father who sought to protect his young child from being indoctrinated by Gay Totalitarians. (www.article8.org). Their hateful intolerance is likewise evidenced by the nonstop slash and destroy campaign being waged against Brian Camenker, Scott Whiteman and the Parents Rights Coalition of MA. They’ve just been informed that a 6-year old lawsuit against them is being revived. Chief among their crimes is that they dared to expose to the public the stomach-churning, sadomasochistic content of “The Little Black Book—Queer in the 21st Century.” (ibid) This abhorrent filth was distributed by the Gay and Straight Education Network (GSLEN) to hundreds of teens at Brook School, Brookline, MA, April 30, 2005. Additionally, the accused are guilty of exposing that the Gay/Straight Alliance in collusion with MA. Dept. of Education employees had instructed children as young as 12 in a variety of sadomasochistic acts, including the grotesque act known as fisting. (Depraved “Fistgate Incident” here: http://www.massresistance.com/docs/issues/fistgate/massnews.html)

An army of cultural Marxists is waging war against America. They have one aim: Total destruction of our civilization. Among the many organizations making up this treacherous army are: National Organization of Women (NOW), Gay and Straight Alliances, the American Civil Liberties Union, NAACP, Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition, Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), Code Pink, and the National Educators Association (NEA). These are but a few of many.

The New Totalitarians ‘house of cards’ is built from lies—big lies, little lies, lies of omission and lies of commission. The antidote to lies and the liars who tell them is Truth—the blunter the better. As noted by Tammy Bruce, the Left is always shocked by her blunt truth. Doubtless they are frightened as well.

Antonin Scalia is another ‘truth-teller’ who recently sent Leftist liars into a tailspin. In a recent speech he was asked about gay issues. His refreshingly honest response was: “Question comes up: is there a Constitutional right to homosexual conduct? Not a hard question for me. It’s absolutely clear that nobody ever thought when the Bill of Rights was adopted that it gave a right to homosexual conduct. Homosexual conduct was criminal for 200 years. Easy question.” (Source: 365Gay.com)

It’s time for Truth to become fashionable in America once again. For much too long liars have made lying chic. So let us begin with these most fundamental of truths: “You shall not bear false witness.” “We are men and women made in the image of God.” We are not polymorphously perverse chimps.

About the Writer: Linda Kimball is a writer and author of numerous articles and essays on culture, politics, and world view. Linda receives e-mail at LindyKimball@msn.com.

Great analysis.

Thanks. Feel free to borrow it -feel free to recommend changes and additions.

here is my latest version -I added to and edited a couple paragraphs in the middle.

Sexual Orientation -- What about Religious Orientation?

Like religion, homosexuality is subjectively determined and declared -NOT objectively determined and confirmed via some objective scientific test. If one feels they are a homosexual and declares they are -who can disagree with them? Who can objectively identify a homosexual person? If those that declare homosexuality become a protected class or exceptional class of individuals warranting extra 'rights' above and beyond those already afforded all human beings THEN what is to prevent everyone from claiming the socially rewarded, prized, and critically acclaimed homosexual status?
Can one imagine a court case on the issue -how can one prove or disprove homosexuality -the basis for all this stuff the leftists are pushing? This reality begs the legal question of sexual "orientation" presumption that at one time was based upon reality e.g. genetalia and now would go unanswered by the new world leftist spectrum of subjective gender premise. The question: in essence will society choose homosexual until proved heterosexual OR heterosexual until proved homosexual? Curious minds want to know?
Now, if homosexual activity was suggested as a test to prove homosexuality then who could prove they would choose to engage in homosexual activity -how do they prove it; must they actually engage in and document homosexual activities to prove homosexual status? Very odd the attempt to equate homosexual status as an innate state of being independent from the only thing that differentiates it from the norm of heterosexuality when considering that heterosexuals are heterosexuals even if remaining celibate virgins.
It is still an established scientific fact and once was a universally accepted fact that all human beings are heterosexual (a scientific term describing those sexually procreative by means of two sexes e.g. male & female versus asexual which is self procreative).
The whole 'homosexual' (non-scientific term) innate identity thing is leftist propaganda. 'Homosexuals' are simply disordered heterosexuals -heterosexuals that feel predisposed to or actually choose to engage in homosexual activities. 'Sex' as it applies to the heterosexual term is scientifically premised in procreation while 'gender' as it applies to the disordered heterosexual (homosexual) term is leftist derived propaganda premised in at best selfish pursuit of recreational sex that by default can not procreate.
There are some that argue homosexuality and or orientation are scientifically proved realities. I say HA! There is no physical orientation test. Science supposedly deals with the physical -'orientation' is metaphysical... That which the scientists supposedly claim is so and supposedly objectively research a cause or reason for is at best a subjective and dynamic condition -cause unknown. Homosexuality is objectively a manifested procreative abnormality cause unknown that would best be termed homosexual orientation syndrome. All this regardless the psychologists and psychiatrists who without scientific basis turn science on its head and claim normality for that which by scientific definition is not the norm.
What of homosexual rights? Should rights be based upon sexual feelings (orientation) or even more on sexual activities that must be proved? It is a fact that feelings are subjective. Consequently, how can any rights be derived from something subjective? In fact, 'buying into' the subjective argument by default implies that rights are given to individuals arbitrarily by the State and as such can be taken away arbitrarily by the State. The whole 'feelings' argument kicks our Founder's recognition of unalienable rights which is basis for our Independence, Union, and Constitution to the curb...
YES -the whole 'feelings' argument guarantees that rights are and will be always subject to the whim of those 'in charge'... How bizarre is it to seek a goal with an argument that if accepted actually nullifies the goal? This is the way of the left...
The homosexual portion of the culture war debate is not about rights -it is all about homosexual sex. The question before society is a simple one; do those that engage in homosexual sex merit privilege and or special rights? It is homosexual sex; not people, that society judges and decides upon -discriminates against or rewards. Society can not rightly judge the heart of an individual; however society can judge an activity. Yes, there are no majestic platitudes comprising human rights questions to be pondered here. When considering this issue the questions to be answered are really quite simple as they involve one activity alone and fall far below the platitudes touted by the left. The answers are objectively obvious when one considers the objective fact that premises the contribution of sexual activity to fostering society. Even the militant delusional can not deny that homosexual sex is a procreative dead end.
Homosexuality is subjectively determined and or declared -NOT objectively determined or declared. I myself can not objectively identify a homosexual person -hence stereotypes are meaningless as are any anecdotal 'things' e.g. 'knowing' one or many homosexuals (those you may 'feel' are homosexual or those who may 'feel' they are homosexuals or those who may declare they are homosexual).
Assuming people are not animals driven by instinct -that people possess an authentic freedom to choose what they do or do not do (unless they suffer some disorder) THEN one can come to but only one objective and rational conclusion. As to homosexuality -truly, it is ONLY sexual activity one chooses to engage in that objectively differentiates homosexual from heterosexual -regardless any subjective 'feelings'...
If one truly understands the subjectivity versus objectivity arguments then one should see clearly the fatally flawed premise underlying subjectivity arguments for homosexual 'rights' and anyone should easily realize that subjectivity flies directly in the face of establishing any objective 'homosexuality' rights or pursuing any objective 'homosexuality' discrimination claims or even objective claims that there is a hatred of homosexuality using the much espoused homophobia meme that some in this discussion indignantly cite.
Legislation and or social mandate regarding just versus unjust discrimination with subsequent social fostering reward versus social penalizing can only be legitimately based upon objective innate characteristics e.g. race and or constitutionally guaranteed activities e.g. religion.
Religion is a constitutionally guaranteed activity -homosexual sex is not. If homosexual sex was guaranteed by the Constitution then I would suggest that at a maximum it would not be mandated, at a minimum like religion there would be the misinterpreted yet very applicable separation clause e.g. a separation of Sex & State... One would not see mandated public school 'indoctrination' of "homosexuality is normal or a valid option" stuff being mandated upon children by judges or homosexual agenda activist groups...
Judges that attempt to create or groups that advocate for special rights above and beyond already realized human rights advocate for these special rights premised upon either a totally subjective self-declared 'orientation' or ones choice of sexual activities. The advocates and judges are simply plying a smoke and mirrors approach in attempt to hoist homosexual activity into acceptance under the guise of providing human rights to individuals already possessing such human rights.
Case in point: US Federal, State, and Local Government entities at this time both set aside contracts and give preference on contracts to minority business owners. I can state unequivocally that 'homosexual' business owners will never be afforded such favor. Answering why I can make such an assured observation quickly gets to the root of the matter and completely knocks down the card house that homosexual agenda proponents attempt to erect...

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.