Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

September 1998 Document: Secret Research Programs Related to WMD (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website ^ | April 11 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 04/11/2006 8:47:53 PM PDT by jveritas

In pages 63 and 64 of document Document CMPC-2003-002284 , there is secret and confidential memo dated September 16 1998 concerning a meeting of the National Monitoring Department to discuss how to destroy some “non necessary documents” and keep the necessary one in a safe place according to the memo but the most important part of the memo is a pareagraph on how to handle “The Researches That Cannot Be Declared and that is related with the previous Prohibited Programs of WMD and how to make sure that information about these researches will not leak to the outside because it will be too dangerous if this happened”. Yet another document that proves without any doubt that Saddam Regime never stopped working in his WMD programs and Research and they were just waiting for the opportune moment to produce these WMD again on a large scale. Also remember that in September 1998 the UN inspectors were still in Iraq and they were kicked later on that year after some US air and missile strikes. So most definitely these Secret Research Programs related to WMD were still in existence and may have reached a more advanced stage from late 1998 to late 2002 where during this period of time there were no UN inspectors in Iraq. This document is another proof that we could have never trusted Saddam and that we had all the right to remove his brutal and terrorist regime after 9/11/2001.

Partial translations of Pages 63 and 64.

Secret and Confidential

Committee Meeting

16/9/1998

Following the meetings of the committee formed per the Presidential-Secretary order numbered 1392 on 11/8/1998, and the committee achieved its meeting on 16/9/1998 and below is the most important of what the meeting included:

1. Review the previous meeting and what was achieved from measures related to the documents that were obtained… Where the documents that does not have a reason to exist (became no value) were destroyed and keeping the portion (in safe place) that the committee believe that its needs will be revealed in the future… and the task was done under very tight and very detailed security measures and that operation lasted (7) seven continuous days.

2. Through the meetings of the committee with a number of the specialized staff that worked previously in the Prohibited Programs (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical, and Rockets) the following was found:

A. There are still a number of different documents with the Senior Staff that worked on the previous Prohibited Programs. The committee with continue to verify the non existence of any Special Document with the concerned people.

B. It was clear that there is another branch committee from the Industrial Committee headead by Dr. Mahdi Shakr Ghali that currently evaluate the Researches That Cannot Be Declared (Researches with relation to the previous Prohibited Programs) through presenting the Specialized Staff that ask to evaluate its researches, to conclusion related to these researches. This is an important subject and it is dangerous in case these information are leaked one way or another. We suggest that one of the specialized in our committee represented in that committee or these researches will be presented to our committee before approving it.

Signature… General, Engineer Hoosam Ahmad Amin Committee Chairman 16/9/1998

Signature… Mr. Moothana Mohamada Ahmed The Representative of the Intelligence Apparatus

Signature… Mr. Maatook Abel Al Satar The Representative of the Atomic Energy Organization.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 09161998; 091698; 091998; cmpc2003002284; documents; gnfi; iraq; iraqiintelligence; jveritas; prewardocs; saddam; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 last
To: jveritas

Let's make sure these documents get printed in book form.


161 posted on 04/12/2006 6:05:57 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I hope a lot of freepers are using the links!


162 posted on 04/12/2006 6:11:48 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Peach

There seem to be some that are sending to many different outlets. It sure seems like it's more positive than when jveritas started. Looks like it's catching on. Had one post that cautioned against making the contacts look like spam. Do you think it could be a problem?


163 posted on 04/12/2006 6:22:42 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I don't think it's a problem. Did someone say that to you?


164 posted on 04/12/2006 6:23:36 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I think it was just a caution, check #38.


165 posted on 04/12/2006 6:31:23 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Hmm - I don't see it in #38. Regardless, I don't think it's a problem if on each of these threads we post the links.


166 posted on 04/12/2006 6:41:16 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Sorry Peach, it's #38 at this thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1613953/posts


167 posted on 04/12/2006 6:50:55 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thanks for finding that, jazusamo.

I'm not positive what the freeper was referring to but do sort of remember that MoveOn and other organizations like that sent out mass mailings and that routinely ignored as spam.

When I send stuff to the media, I send it to them directly. In other words, I don't send it to a whole slew of them at once. I know it takes more time that way and am not certain it's the best way or makes a difference.

Maybe you could freepmail that freeper and he'd correspond with you and give you more information. If he does, please share it with me, if you don't mind.

Thanks for all you're doing, jazusamo. I appreciate it very much and think that it represents the best of Free Republic. Activism.


168 posted on 04/12/2006 6:58:13 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

That looks like a pretty good letter to send out.

I do have one suggestion though. You may want to add that jveritas puts a link to the originals in each of his translations. That way they can get to the posting of the original document, and not just get a translation that they have no way of verifying.


169 posted on 04/12/2006 7:55:33 PM PDT by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

"There's an old trick in the media circle that usually works in getting the word out, target small outlets, local newspapers and local news, and then the MSM can't take not being the head honcho and will follow. Look at the Cheney Accidental Shooting."

I was thinking the same thing the other day, so I have started doing that for the small town newspapers in the state of Kansas.

I urge others to do the same in their state.


170 posted on 04/12/2006 8:21:28 PM PDT by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom

It'll work but it takes a lot more effort and once one gets published it really opens the gates.


171 posted on 04/12/2006 8:26:46 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Ping to read later


172 posted on 04/13/2006 1:01:41 AM PDT by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson