Posted on 04/17/2006 8:40:37 AM PDT by jveritas
Bump.
Sorry, got to the party late...
Attaboy, jveritas! Don't burn out though. Make sure you get your mind off of documents and on to some R&R periodically.
Since most of the important comments have already been made, I'll stick to the lighter stuff by pointing out that you guys are all wrong.
SPECIAL WEAPONS ARE THE ONES THAT GET FIRED FROM A SHORT YELLOW TUBE!
No problem ... just had to get home from work to find them. That's the great thing about FR. I forget three times as much as I ever remember, but someone else can always remind me.
Kudos, for the heavy lifting, JV. Let me second Coop's excellent point and add one more: Cross-link (read "footnote the Hell out of") as much of this as possible. The loony left won't buy in, anyway, but it won't be for a dearth of factual data exposing the cavernous divergence between reality and their perception of it.
Keep updated off-site backups of your hard drive volume(s) or, better, operate synchronized mirror volumes at multiple locations. Insurance against the "prone to sudden disappearance" characteristic of some kinds of information.
Ka-BUMP!
"The spelling of names...
Rasheed and Rashid.
Al Mira, Al Mirah, Al-Mirah, Al-Mira
Abdallah and Abdullah.
Are these still the same, even with the different spellings? Does Al Mirah mean the mirror?"
Hard to say, but many names don't have a common spelling even though many linguists use a common arabic dictionary.
absolutely, especially when you consider that there is ubdoubtedly internal Iraq sources that have never been revealed for their own protection.
thank you
sure thing, it concerned me as well
Saddam's Archives: We're Getting Warmer
April 17, 2006
****************************AN EXCERPT *****************************
As regular readers know, we've been cautious about drawing conclusions from the tiny number of Iraqi documents that have so far been made public under Project Harmony. But today, jveritas at Free Republic, whose translation efforts we linked to here, has come up with what appears to be a highly significant memorandum.
This is how he introduces the translation:..........
***************************************************
See beginning of this thread or the link.....
******************************
The apparent significance of this document requires no elaboration. Transferring a load of ordinary munitions from Najaf to Baghdad would presumably not require the approval of the Army's Chief of Staff; nor would it be the subject of a top secret memo; nor would arrangements for "special vehicles" be necessary. Hugh Hewitt writes:
*****************************************************************
More at the Powerline Link above..........
You guys need to see some of the questions being raised on the Powerline Blog,...see link above....
Interesting the Powerline readers say the munitions are too small to deliver WMD. Is there another meaning of "special ammunition"?
The 14.5 mm round was used originally for anti-tank rounds, though by the 1950s it was no longer effective against tanks but remained effective against other armored vehicles.
It's also a Russian round. Wonder if the "special ammunition" is what Russia gave them?
The first priority ammunition from the document is all large enough to deliver WMD. jveritas ... is there anything about the document that might suggest why one was first priority and one was second priority? Does the classification of first vs. second priority mean something more than what's obvious (ie. is "priority" a code word for something else or can it be translated in another way)?
Is there a way I can log in at Powerline and answer some of the questions?
Special Ammunition is not any other ammunition, what is special about 155 mm shells if it does not contain Chemical Weapons. The Iraqi used the term "Special Ammunition" exclusively to designate "Chemical Weapons".
Most of this 262 pages document is about spreading different types of ammunitions, and only this 9 pages top secret memo use the term "Special Ammunition". As I said before this term is not loosely used by the Iraqis it is a very specific term to designate "Chemical Weapons Ammunition".
Conventional air defense munitions.
Yeah I hear you, but is there any reason that conventional ammo would be on the manifest along with the chemical munitions? Seems odd that they were consigned the same "special" status, even though they were cat 'B'.
I was wondering if there was anywhere in the document that would further explain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.