Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pulitzer awards reflect discontent (of course with President Bush)
Market Watch.com ^ | April 19, 2006 | Jon Friedman

Posted on 04/19/2006 6:25:27 AM PDT by Grampa Dave

The Pulitzer awards reflect discontent (Of course discontent with President Bush means that it is okay to give Pulitzer Prizes to a newspaper which lied about the NSA non story while breaking National Security Laws.)

Commentary: By Jon Friedman, MarketWatch Last Update: 12:01 AM ET Apr 19, 2006

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Many awards presentations are accused of being out of touch with the public or even appearing to be popularity contests. But I contend that many of the Pulitzer Prizes, handed out on Monday, accurately reflected the nation's growing discontent with President Bush.

In particular, the awards presented to reporters James Risen and Eric Lichtblau of the New York Times (NYTNew York Times Company as well as editorial cartoonist Mike Luckovich of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution could be called a reflection of Bush's declining national approval rating.

Cited for national reporting, Risen and Lichtblau broke the news of the administration's wiretapping program. Priest, winning in the beat-reporting category, was commended for stories about secret prisons and the government's counterterrorism efforts. Luckovich wittily skewered the administration's policies on many occasions.

The wiretapping story seems like the most compelling one of all. It has dominated the Washington talk shows for months and triggered a slew of fascinating sub-plots. The administration has contended that it needed to counter the threat of domestic terrorism while critics have said the program was a blow to civil liberties and reduced individuals' privacy. Awards are like children -- editors, like parents, say publicly that they love them all equally. But I wouldn't be surprised if this one especially pleased the Times hierarchy.

If anything, the Pulitzer vindicates the Times as a hard-hitting and public-spirited news operation. Originally, Times' critics blasted the paper for sitting on the Risen-Lichtblau story, insisting that the newspaper appeared to be timid in the face of the Bush administration's pressure tactics. Some Bush supporters, meanwhile, promptly took the opposite point of view and concluded that the Times had committed a traitorous act by publishing the stories. Considering that this sort of intense red-blue states warfare has been going on since (at least) the 2004 presidential campaigns, it wasn't a surprise that the Times' reporting would further polarize the nation. But that kind of parlor talk should be a secondary point today. For now, the Pulitzer selection committee deserves a big thumbs-up for getting it right this year.

(article excerpted from this point as it goes into other areas.)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: awards; bigbreakingnews; bushhatred; msmwoes; pulitzer; pulitzerawards; pulitzerbias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: george76

The other sites have nothing to do with politics. :)


61 posted on 04/19/2006 9:33:40 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
LOL..................... there was too much makeup.

I think she looks much better undolled-up! Most good girls do.

62 posted on 04/19/2006 9:48:03 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Oh, for the days when "disrespect" was just a noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Media whores awarding awards to other media whores is a completely insignificant event. It's like the DNC awarding a best Democrat award.


63 posted on 04/19/2006 9:50:37 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party. For those who value slogans over solutions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
LOL ....... and thanks!

Howard Hughes (Jane Russell) would have liked that picture of dear Katherine.

;-)

64 posted on 04/19/2006 9:51:19 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Oh, for the days when "disrespect" was just a noun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

"Media whores awarding awards to other media whores is a completely insignificant event. It's like the DNC awarding a best Democrat award."

That is an excellent summary of the zero impact of these awards.


65 posted on 04/19/2006 9:57:32 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Dave,
Ain't capitalism great?!


66 posted on 04/19/2006 9:57:36 AM PDT by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RKV

"Dave,
Ain't capitalism great?!"

Yes it is, and that is why the liberals hate capitalism with every breath.


67 posted on 04/19/2006 9:58:47 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I thought they reflected an overall lack of readership. Has any of the media outlets represented by these stellar individuals improved their market share over the course of the year?


68 posted on 04/19/2006 10:48:28 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Watching the Left turn on Senator McCain amuses me somehow....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

"Has any of the media outlets represented by these stellar individuals improved their market share over the course of the year?"

I don't believe that any of them have increased their market shares.


69 posted on 04/19/2006 11:02:12 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Recall that the Nobel Committee was forthright in saying that awarding a Nobel to Carter was intended to be a kick in the shins to GW. These prizes mean about as much as used toilet paper.


70 posted on 04/19/2006 6:54:27 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

71 posted on 04/21/2006 1:40:51 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist homosexual lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson