Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crude futures prices tap $75 for first time ever in NY
CBS Marketwatch ^ | 4/21/2006

Posted on 04/21/2006 10:46:54 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Crude-oil futures climbed to a high of $75 per barrel Friday for the first time ever for a front-month contract on concerns about tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear activities, violence in Nigeria, and tight U.S. supplies of unleaded gasoline. June crude was last up $1.26, or 1.7%, at $74.95 per barrel. "We often see this sort of short covering in a record-setting bull market ahead of a weekend, since nobody is sure where we may be Monday," said trader Kevin Kerr, who is also editor of MarketWatch's Global Resources Trader.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crude; economicilliteracy; oil; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 next last
To: santorumlite

"...This market is dictated by fear mongering...."

If that's the case, then nobody can tell me this is nothing BUT price gouging.


261 posted on 04/22/2006 7:16:39 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (RADICAL ISLAM IS A CULT. IT MUST BE ELIMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Let's face facts. With the government-approved mergers of big oil companies, competition is dead.

Why is the United States determined to control Iran? In order to answer that question we must understand just a little about economics. In 1932, President Franklin Roosevelt decoupled the dollar from gold, but gold was still being paid to other countries as they redeemed U.S. dollars. During 1970-1971, the United States was no longer able to pay other governments with gold, and the nations of the world were stuck with continually inflating U.S. dollars. In order to maintain global demand for the U.S. dollar, the U.S. Government made a 1972-73 arrangement with Saudi Arabia to support the House of Saud if they, Saudi Arabia and all of the OPEC, the oil producing nations, would accept only U.S. dollars for payment of oil. Now all of the oil-hungry nations of the world were forced to clamor for the ever-inflating U.S. dollar since it was the only means by which they could purchase that commodity. This established the strength of the dollar as it was now backed in a defacto sense by oil.

In the year 2000, one man dared to reject the U.S. dollar for payment for oil and chose to accept the Euro instead. This threatened the dollar severely. That man was Saddam Hussein! He suddenly became the greatest villain in the world and became dreadfully evil. Here let it be noted that he was just as evil when we armed him, supported him, and embraced him years earlier. We overlooked his infamy then, but this rejection of the dollar vilified him above measure. When President Bush announced his policy of shock and awe and pounded Iraq, he quickly re-established the dollar as the only oil money. That is what the Iraqi war is all about.

Here let it be noted that Iran has announced that as of March 21st, 2006, that it will no longer accept U.S. dollars for oil, and that it has persuaded all of the OPEC nations to accept the Euro and other currencies as well. None of the nations will have to buy and hold dollars to buy oil, and this will reduce the U.S. dollar to nearly junk status on the world market. That is why it has been determined that Iran must be punished!

Iran will not use the American dollar as the purchasing currency for oil. Iran has been inducing OPEC to scrap the American dollar, which the OPEC nations required for payment of oil no matter what country was buying it. President Bush has been playing up to the so-called friendly Arab nations to induce OPEC to retain the U.S. dollar as purchasing currency for oil. Mr. Bush has offered the Arabs our seaports, toll roads, airlines and airports, forest lands, and almost anything else he can sell them. It was all to be done in a very surreptitious and clandestine manner. On February 23rd, 2006, the Associated Press released the story of White House documents proving that the deal with the Arabs was under a secret agreement with the Bush Administration.


262 posted on 04/22/2006 9:10:13 PM PDT by Joined2Justify (tagline removed for security reasons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Joined2Justify
Thank you, now we're getting somewhere.

Please, do go on.

263 posted on 04/22/2006 9:28:11 PM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: norraad
You people attacking the producers...disgusting. Why don't you go to Nigeria and drill for oil if you can do it cheaper? Watch out for the militant Islamic rebels that are attacking oil facilities.

Exxon found ONE new barrel of oil in the ground for every SIX it produced last year.

264 posted on 04/22/2006 9:39:01 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff
Like any other criminal organization, they have many sets of books.

Which one were you referring too?

265 posted on 04/22/2006 10:20:49 PM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Fishrrman

$4.00 per gallon gas (it's already $3.35 and climbing at some places around here) and shortages to boot, are going to lead to a Democratic takeover of Congress this November.

It DOESN'T MATTER how much rhetoric a few Freepers are going to extoll regarding the concept of "free markets". It doesn't matter one whit




Yep. Dead on. I've said the exact same thing here for months, and been called a communist for saying something's got to be done. Incidentally, they have NEVER responded or commented on the public voting their wallets and causing a dem takeover. Never. Most interesting.


266 posted on 04/23/2006 2:58:01 AM PDT by The Foolkiller (BSXL* The year the NFL became irrelevant..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Seriously, after 9/11 I was convinced, naively, that we would do the following:



You and me both. About 11am on 9/11 I thought to myself, "Thank God that this is the end of political correctness."

Boy, was I a dumb ass.



Know what? I was, too. I thought the exact same thing, only a few days later. PC has jumped tenfold since then-look at the war on Christmas/Easter, just as one example. We've lost more freedom in this country SINCE 9/11 than before it. And a lot of it thanks to Republicans pushing and passing bullshit socialistic laws(no, not talking about the Patriot Act here, laws in various RHINO controlled states).


267 posted on 04/23/2006 3:28:34 AM PDT by The Foolkiller (BSXL* The year the NFL became irrelevant..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: iraqikurd
I thought everyone would have caught on to riding motorcycles and walking again

Winter is a big deterrent......

268 posted on 04/23/2006 3:48:18 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I wish Jack Bauer would stop yelling.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

For the last thiety five years I have seen gas prices increase every summur {vacation travel}and in the winter {heating costs}never changes never will.


269 posted on 04/23/2006 4:05:01 AM PDT by Vaduz (and just think how clean the cities would become again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joined2Justify; norraad
Senator Biden ... is that you?

If you are going to quote from an article to make your point, that is all well and good, but it is appropriate to mark it in quotations and give the source.

"Why is the United States determined to control Iran? In order to answer that question we must understand just a little about economics. In 1932, President Franklin Roosevelt decoupled the dollar from gold, but gold was still being paid to other countries as they redeemed U.S. dollars. During 1970-1971, the United States was no longer able to pay other governments with gold, and the nations of the world were stuck with continually inflating U.S. dollars. In order to maintain global demand for the U.S. dollar, the U.S. Government made a 1972-73 arrangement with Saudi Arabia to support the House of Saud if they, Saudi Arabia and all of the OPEC, the oil producing nations, would accept only U.S. dollars for payment of oil. Now all of the oil-hungry nations of the world were forced to clamor for the ever-inflating U.S. dollar since it was the only means by which they could purchase that commodity. This established the strength of the dollar as it was now backed in a defacto sense by oil."

Holy plagiarism Batman! That looks exactly like your post # 262.

In fact it's taken directly from http://www.lasttrumpetministries.org/2006/March2006.html

Have a nice Sunday.






270 posted on 04/23/2006 4:06:14 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Ironically, $10 gas is good for Republicans who will have an instant mandate to drill oil, mine coal, and build nukes as fast as possible to reverse a massive depression.

In the interim, the US military will annex the Venezuelan and Middle Eastern oil fields until energy independence is achieved.


BUMP

271 posted on 04/23/2006 4:37:15 AM PDT by capitalist229 (Keep Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
From parts of both March and April. It was late, I was tired and had to mag the screen 150 percent to barely view what these old eyes could see. There were quotes, but it turned it all into one huge block of text. I should have at least given David Meyers credit.

My appologies to you both.
272 posted on 04/23/2006 5:04:29 AM PDT by Joined2Justify (tagline removed for security reasons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Joined2Justify
I understand completely.

No foul. In fact I probably over reacted. It doesn't seem so bad, now that I have had some coffee and breakfast. ;)




273 posted on 04/23/2006 5:19:44 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

I'm just glad this controversy mentions the big elephant in the room no will talk about.


274 posted on 04/23/2006 11:01:18 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: santorumlite
These traders are dense as hell.

There is no indication of a war with iran.

If you're so sure, go short! Put your money where you mouth is. If you're right, you could make a killing.

275 posted on 04/23/2006 1:19:45 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Release oil from the strategic reserve at rate of 0.5 Million to 1 million barrel a day. This will drop the oil price world wide by 15 to 20 dollars.

The reserve is supposed to be for strategic emergencies, like the Saudi or Iranian oilfields going offline. The current situation hardly qualifies.

276 posted on 04/23/2006 1:30:01 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tigtog
America, Europe, Japan, China, India, et.al. My bet is that America with the most diversified economy is in better shape to weather the sustained high oil costs compared with the rest of the world.

Actually, no. Europe and Japan are much less dependent on petroleum than we are. Their higher gas taxes have lead to higher fuel effeciency standards as well as a more diversified source of energy production and transportation.

We've done next to nothing about energy for the last 20 years, even as the writing has been on the wall. The chickens are coming home to roost.

277 posted on 04/23/2006 1:33:59 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
You're right about nuclear, but don't pooh-pooh the renewables. If we're ever going to get ourselves off oil, we're going to need many different sources of energy. Wind and solar, together with hydroelectric, nuclear and gassified coal will all have to be part of the mix.
278 posted on 04/23/2006 1:42:26 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

IF Congress substantially relaxed regulations on new refineries, and IF the NIMBY attitudes could be overcome, oil companies would still have little incentive to build a new refinery. Expanding capacity of existing refineries makes a lot more sense.

That's why refiners aren't launching a public opinion campaign to build new refineries.


279 posted on 04/23/2006 3:49:17 PM PDT by cockroach_magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: cockroach_magoo

I appreciate that take on the situation.

Expansion of existing refineries may get us thru the near-term pinch we are in, or maybe not. The hurdles to do even that are staggering.


280 posted on 04/23/2006 4:31:43 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-292 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson