Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United 93 (An Early Review)
Reel Reviews ^ | james berardinelli

Posted on 04/25/2006 1:34:11 PM PDT by pcottraux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Calpernia

Have you seen the movie? What changes?


41 posted on 04/25/2006 2:24:56 PM PDT by blu (People, for God's sake, think for yourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pogo101
A John Ford documentary, "December 7th, 1941," came out in 1943 and won an Oscar. "The Flying Tigers" starring John Wayne, came out in 1942 and featured news of the attack near the end of the movie (including Roosevelt's speech declaring war on Japan being broadcast over a radio). The first movie that I can recall being directly about Pearl Harbor is the classic From Here To Eternity, which came out in 1953, twelve years later.

Note: Some of the pilots who were in the real Flying Tigers were reportedly so embarressed by the movie when they were invited to the premiere that they were caught trying to sneak out of the theater...also, John Wayne reportedly got drunk with some pilots while on a tour in New Guinea and they left him out on the tarmac on a cot, stark naked. He woke up with a hangover, rolled over and went back to sleep (from The Internet Movie Databases's Flying Tigers page).

42 posted on 04/25/2006 2:25:02 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove

Well, I think the point isn't to make ANY commentary on the events. Just show it for what happened.


43 posted on 04/25/2006 2:25:48 PM PDT by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: blu
If there's ever been a dramatic treatment of historical events that didn't take some sort of dramatic license it's news to me.
44 posted on 04/25/2006 2:26:08 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: blu

I've not seen it. I just know some families involved.


45 posted on 04/25/2006 2:27:49 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
The only people who might have some validity in being uncomfortable with the film are the very close friends and family members of those who died on 9/11.

Anyone else not in that category saying that it's "too soon" is someone who would never be comfortable with a patriotic 9/11 movie coming out ever, and would rather just forget that it ever happened.

46 posted on 04/25/2006 2:28:14 PM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Let's just hope it has no impact on trials.


47 posted on 04/25/2006 2:28:40 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
What in the world????

HOW could the cockpit be intact?...it took a nosedive into the ground?

This has to be an untruth!

48 posted on 04/25/2006 2:29:19 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

"...what we need is a MSM that shows the towers being brought down at least once daily. Show the grusome stuff..the folks throwing themselves off the towers in desperation."

Yes, exactly what the fanatical Muzzies want....more advertising.

/sarcasm off


49 posted on 04/25/2006 2:29:42 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
On movies boards people say "Stone is a great director so there will be no politics involved." Yeah. Sure. I respond that if they hire Quentin Tarantino to do a "Barney" film, something is guaranteed to get massacred in the movie.
50 posted on 04/25/2006 2:29:42 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

>>>it took a nosedive into the ground

You know that?


51 posted on 04/25/2006 2:30:39 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

What if they (like this movie) help people to steel their resolve and recognize how depraved, evil and soulless our enemies are?


52 posted on 04/25/2006 2:31:58 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (If low-skill workers were key to economic growth, Mexico would be an economic powerhouse.-Rich Lowry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Look Calpernia....every account I've heard or read said there was only a crater & the plane had simply disintegrated, along with the passengers....

..not unlike what happened to the people riding the trade centers down.

53 posted on 04/25/2006 2:34:07 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jpl
"Anyone else not in that category saying that it's "too soon" is someone who would never be comfortable with a patriotic 9/11 movie coming out ever, and would rather just forget that it ever happened."

Not necessarily. I'd like to see the follow-up of the 911 attack... some real accounts of heroism like when the US troops and allies churned the Muzzy bastards guts into axle grease.....perhaps a few feet of footage of the Black Watch running out of ammo and chasing down some of the "insurgents" with their knives and eviscerating them one by one. Now THAT's entertainment!

:)
54 posted on 04/25/2006 2:34:21 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
I would rather have the Flight 93 passengers.

I think we all would have rather had the passengers. The only thing is, if we didn't have a Capitol building, the outcome would still have been the same for the passengers.

I'd rather have both and have dead terrorists.

55 posted on 04/25/2006 2:35:52 PM PDT by Sally'sConcerns (Native Texan, now in SW Ok.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

But Greengrass and Universal Pictures knew the project would be controversial and had to be done with the full consent of all the families of those who died. In an industry best known for its ruthlessness and mercenary ideals, that was a revolutionary idea. So began a remarkable outreach campaign which not only won that consent but also turned it into co-operation. Contacts were made through an organisation representing the families and meetings were held with relatives.

Maybe you have different information...


56 posted on 04/25/2006 2:37:54 PM PDT by colorcountry (Don't bother me,.... I'm living happily ever after.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: paddles
Didn't release of "The Fighting Sullivans" get delayed during WWII for much the same reason?

I don't know anything about a delay, and since the sinking of the Juneau happened on Nov. 11, 1942 and the movie opened on Feb. 3, 1944, it sure doesn't look like there was any meaningful delay.

57 posted on 04/25/2006 2:39:17 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Choose Ye This Day
"What if they (like this movie) help people to steel their resolve and recognize how depraved, evil and soulless our enemies are?"

I don't need to see the vid of the poor Thai chap getting his head slowly sawed off with a very dull knife... and hearing the death rattle noises coming from his lungs as they stopped and watched him in his death throes.....

over and over and over.

Once is enough for me to get the point across.

However......
I do like to put in the famous F-16 strike vid appropriately names "Awwwwww DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDDDEEEEEE" at least once a week for a good laugh.
Seeing those maggots getting immolated and bowled over by that 500 pounder never fails to get a chuckle out of me.

:)
58 posted on 04/25/2006 2:39:34 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere

>>>>every account I've heard or read said there was only a crater & the plane had simply disintegrated, along with the passengers....

Yes, everything that has been released for our information.

Is this correct? What will happen if a trial reveals different information? Will the movie taint that?


59 posted on 04/25/2006 2:40:51 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

>>>>But Greengrass and Universal Pictures knew the project would be controversial and had to be done with the full consent of all the families of those who died.

You don't have to believe me. See post 26.


60 posted on 04/25/2006 2:42:32 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson