Posted on 04/28/2006 9:03:39 AM PDT by Bob J
In a just concluded debate and press conference, author and FBI Consultant Paul Williams and Jeff Epstein of "America's Truth Forum" reveal they have been advised by Pakistani journalist and Bin Laden biographer Hamid Amir that Al-Qaeda will use smuggled nukes against the US if the US takes military action against Iran.
Amir established his credentials by correctly predicting that Egypt would be hit by terrorist action a full two weeks prior to the events of last week. Amir, a Pakistani journalist, has been in contact with high ranking Al-Qaeda officials for several years.
The debate (between Richard Miniter and Paul Williams) and press conference were webcast LIVE by Rightalk.com. Audio files of both events will be available for downloading by this afternoon.
How do you limit the nuclear fallout to just the Dome?
Well...here is a great starting place:
21 25'19.95N
39 49"42.22E
....that stupid rock they do the hokey pokie around every year.
True, islam is far more dangerous and suicidal than communism. And the islamic individuals involved are far more morally connected to the cause than the communist soviet people.
I said a construction project, with bulldozers and so on. Not any nukes on the dome. Just remove the necessary parts in a few days with construction equipment.
I disagree. We'd have to prove Iran was behind the entire operation, which I don't think we would be able to do and even if we did, we would invade and remove the mullahs, no nukes.
We have very few Persians in Detroit. What we DO have are Chaldeans, Iraqis, Lebanese and Yemenis - lots of them.
And far more volitile. We need to stay focused on the ones that are the problem rather than inflame the ones that are not.
So, we take out Jerusalem to get at the Dome?
"We'd have to prove Iran was behind the entire operation"
According to what court? LOL!
The court of Bob J??
Ooops, you meant Mecca, not the Dome.
I am reading a new book about the fall of Constantinople. In 678, after a prolonged siege, the Byzantines attacked an Arab force using a powerful naval force armed with "Greek fire", undoubtedly an ancestor of napalm. The show of force, and the almost magical destructive properties of "Greek fire" frightened the Arabs so much that they never conquered the city; Islam did not triumph there until 1453, and then it was through Turkish rather than Arab forces.
Nuclear weapons are our Greek Fire.
Regards, Ivan
Yah, exactly.
That fact is so painfully obvious, it boggles the mind that anybody with an IQ greater then 12 could miss this fact.
About the only validity one can find in the threat is that Iranian nuclear engineers might release low-grade enriched uranium to terrorists for a dirty bomb, but I wouldn't place much credence in a critical nuclear detonation being triggered by an islamite terrorist for a long time.
That being said, AQ most likely does NOT have nuclear materials, but expect to get it from Iran if Iran is attacked.
I don't disagree there might be military ops around the globe, just no nuking of cities which is what some here are advocating.
The horror...
I can just say, that I know some insiders and I know that it's already inflamed. You can not inflame it more or less by nuking mecca.
The only effect will be that many may either rethink their stance and give it up, or will be very open and easy targets.
Both are good for us.
The Persians are in LA.
Mecca and Medina,
a radioactive toursit trap for islamic trash.
Stop wetting your pants. It'll be okay.
You are totally not reading.
My entire point In Regards to the Mount was that it can be disassembled and the islamic parts removed by bulldozers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.