Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP NewsBreak: Guard Stint to Last 2 Years (at least two years with no clear end date)
The AP via Yahoo! News ^ | May 19, 2006 | Aaron C. Davis

Posted on 05/19/2006 7:50:15 PM PDT by new yorker 77

President Bush's planned deployment of National Guard troops to the Mexican border would last at least two years with no clear end date, according to a Pentagon memo obtained Friday by The Associated Press.

The one-page "initial guidance" memo to National Guard leaders in border states does not address the estimated cost of the mission or when soldiers would be deployed. But high-ranking officials in the California National Guard said they were told Friday that deployments would not begin before early June.

While the military document makes clear the troops would remain under the command of their governors, it also indicates a high degree of federal control over operations. It states that the National Guard Bureau's Army and Air Directories "will serve as the states' focal points for force-planning, training, organizing and equipping their forces."

Guardsmen in "all other states, territories and the District of Columbia" will serve a supportive role, according to the memo.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has not yet decided whether to commit troops to the mission, led a conference call with the governors of Arizona, New Mexico and Texas to discuss the memo.

"There still remains a lot of unanswered questions that the governor is concerned about," Adam Mandelsohn, Schwarzenegger's communications director. "Most specifically, the outstanding funding issues and whether there is a commitment to the two-year time frame," he said.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano said they would support the deployment of National Guard troops to the border, while New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Democrat, has been more critical of the plan.

A spokeswoman for Perry said the governors agreed to send a letter asking the Bush administration to clarify issues such as funding, rotation and troop levels that would be stationed in each of the states.

The president outlined the plan Monday night as part of a national address on curbing illegal immigration, pledging to gain control of the border and give up to 12 million illegal immigrants a chance at citizenship.

He proposed deploying 6,000 troops at a time to the border in two-week rotations. The deployments would be temporary, he said, until enough Border Patrol agents were hired to secure the mission. He asked Congress to add 6,000 more Border Patrol agents by the end of his presidency.

The White House also said the troops would be financed with part of the $1.9 billion requested from Congress this year to supplement border enforcement.

The memo sent Friday to Guard leaders went further, stating that units would remain in a "federally funded" mission for "up to one year, with a force reduction to 3,000 during the second year."

The document described an "end date" for the mission when the U.S. Border Patrol operation "gains independent operational control of the (southwest border) and National Guard forces are no longer required for this mission."

The memo said the Guard units' missions will focus on "surveillance, reconnaissance, aviation, intelligence, engineering, training, vehicle dismantling, linguistics ... transportation and logistics."

They will not be asked to perform law-enforcement functions, but rather provide "vetted and pre-coordinated support to law enforcement."

___

Associated Press Writers Paul Davenport in Phoenix and Sheila Flynn in Dallas contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

Copyright © 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: assocpressstinks; homebychristmas; nationalguard; southernborder; twowholeyears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: FreeReign

EXCELLENT POST!

The closer we get to November 2008, this sounds EXACTLY like what we can expect from Murtha and the Cut-N-Run crowd.

What disturbs me is how prophetic your post may actually be.

It sounds almost TOO real.....


81 posted on 05/20/2006 5:23:57 AM PDT by TheRobb7 (The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
IF you voted for him, it was most likely because he was a strong leader who said what he meant, and did what he said.

Because he was honest, and courageous, and the kind of leader this country needed.

He hasn't changed. Why have you?

82 posted on 05/20/2006 6:13:07 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk; JeanS
She got you, Fishtalk.

It's not wise to call the one who outwitted you, 'Hon.' ;)

83 posted on 05/20/2006 6:15:09 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I think you're wrong.
84 posted on 05/20/2006 6:30:41 AM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fishtalk

LOL! OK.


85 posted on 05/20/2006 6:39:55 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
He hasn't changed. Why have you?

What is your favorite flavor of cool-aide???

86 posted on 05/20/2006 6:51:26 AM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Clever. Original. Creative.

Now answer the question. What has changed YOU that you no longer support him?

(Or was that just a seminar caller line you used?)

87 posted on 05/20/2006 6:54:01 AM PDT by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: oldbill
Given the two week deployment criteria, that means up to 150,000 Guardsmen will eventually be sent to the border.

Now that is just plain over the top, tell you what, you watch and when it hit's 10,000 you post that fact. Until then try to stay in the shade.

88 posted on 05/20/2006 6:54:28 AM PDT by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

What thats all only two years? make a vacation out of it..


89 posted on 05/20/2006 7:00:55 AM PDT by tomnbeverly (Steer Clear Of Large Metropolitian Areas Because The Liberals Will Reap What They Sow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
I wonder, though, why the deployment was announced before the details were in place.

Republicans needed to get ahead of the story.

90 posted on 05/20/2006 7:32:53 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

The Army doesn't do anything in 2 week rotations.


91 posted on 05/20/2006 7:33:54 AM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377; All

What else is knew...


92 posted on 05/20/2006 7:44:46 AM PDT by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Uh, do we have the UN's permission for this action? /s


:O)

P


93 posted on 05/20/2006 8:17:21 AM PDT by papasmurf (Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Can someone enlighten me as to why Posse Comitatis plays any role in this issue of border control? Seriously, I know the military (supposedly) cannot use force against its citizens.

But, we're not talking about using force against our own citizens. We're talking about one of the few responsibilities of the Federal government, to control our borders.
94 posted on 05/20/2006 8:28:35 AM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion
Ya' know, that kinda' mindset just grates on me to no end.
You're either a supporter or you're not. NOBODY is perfect!

I'm am no less happy about the President's immigration efforts than anyone else. BUT, to drop your support for him because of this is just plain ridiculous! Honest criticism and discussion is good, but to lay your support on one issue? Puh-lease.

Or maybe you never really did SUPPORT him?

The President has taken on and fought the fights that HE sees as being the most important and relevant. That's what a good President does, he doesn't pander or knuckle under, he stays focused like a laser beam on HIS agenda.

He's got the job, not us.

:O)

P
95 posted on 05/20/2006 8:35:11 AM PDT by papasmurf (Join Team 36120 Free Republic Folders. Folding@Home Enter Name:FRpapasmurf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
A two-week rotation? Take away travel time, orientation, billeting, etc. and you've probably got 9-10 days of actual duty. They won't even find out where the restrooms are in that amount of time.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

96 posted on 05/20/2006 9:15:10 AM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
A better alternative......MINE THE BORDER! Mines are much much cheaper, last for decades, can't be tunneled under very well and are a very effective message to send to Mexico!

That's a stupid idea.

The IQ of this thread just dropped 50 points.

97 posted on 05/20/2006 9:45:11 AM PDT by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion
I honestly believe that GWB has SO definately failed our country on the immigration issue that he might rightly DESERVE Impeachment.

What a clown. Do you live under a bridge troll or a freeway overpass?

98 posted on 05/20/2006 9:56:06 AM PDT by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
LOL, the media instinctively shouts "QUAGMIRE" regardless of circumstances when their is a Republican in the WH.

Exactly. What about the Balkan quagmire!?

99 posted on 05/20/2006 10:02:10 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Kerry-Mcarthy in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

I think this is going to be the yearly "weekend warrior" rotation -- this time on the border instead of the desert somewhere.


100 posted on 05/20/2006 11:59:14 AM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson