Skip to comments.The Essential President Bush [Bush did not abandon us; we abandoned him]
Posted on 05/22/2006 6:16:18 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
A much-esteemed, long-neglected friend sent an email this morning, which was delightful to recieve. At one point he mentioned this post from yesterday and wrote: I think (President Bush) has lost his bearings. but then, so did Moses from time to time, it’s quite understandable.
That made me wonder a little - has President Bush lost his bearings, or have we? Is it President Bush who has broken faith with “his base” or have they?
When I read my friend’s line, I thought of a line from Pride and Prejudice, in which Elizabeth Bennett says in new appreciation of Mr. Darcy, “In essentials, I believe, he is very much what he ever was.”
Perhaps I am a dim bulb, but President Bush has never surprised me, and that is probably why I have never felt let down or “betrayed” by him. He is, in essentials, precisely whom he has ever been. He did not surprise me when he managed, in August of 2001, to find a morally workable solution in the matter of Embryonic Stem Cells. He did not surprise me when, a month later, he stood on a pile of rubble and lifted a broken city from its knees. When my NYFD friends told me of the enormous consolation and strength he brought to his meetings with grieving families, I was not surprised. When the World Series opened in New York City and the President was invited to throw the first pitch, there was no surprise in his throwing (while wearing body armor) a perfect strike.
He did not surprise me when he spoke eloquently from the National Cathedral, or again before the Joint Houses of Congress, when he laid out the Bush Doctrine. He did not surprise me when he did it again at West Point, or when he went visionary at Whitehall (don’t try to find a tape of it, honey, that was ONE SPEECH C-Span never re-ran and the press quickly tried to move along from).
There were no surprises in President Bush’s invasion of Afghanistan to battle AlQaeda. There were no surprises when he went after an Iraq which everyone believed had WMD, an Iraq that had tried to assassinate an American President, an Iraq whose NYC consul did not lower its flag to half-mast after 9/11.
Actually, there was one surprise. He did surprise me by going back to the UN, and back to the UN, in that mythical “rush to war” we heard so much about. But then again, the effort in Iraq was never as “unilateral” as it had been painted.
President Bush did not surprise me when, faced with the scorn of “the world community” and those ever-ready A.N.S.W.E.R. marches which sprang up condemning him and Tony Blair, he stood firm. A lesser man, a mere politician, would have folded under such enormous pressure. I was not surprised when Bush did not. (Aside - it’s funny how they just can’t get a good-sized crowd together for those protests these days, innit? Everything about Iraq was “wrong” and everything about Iraq is “failure and quagmire” and yet, somehow, we all breathe a sigh of relief that the job is done, that Saddam is out of power and that Iraq, save a very small piece of troubled land, is - in remarkably short order (and despite the wild pronouncements of John Murtha) - tasting its first morsels of democracy and liberty, and showing promise.)
It never surprised me that Yassar Arafat, formerly the “most welcomed” foreign “Head of State” in the Clinton White House was not welcomed - ever - to the Bush White House.
I wasn’t surprised by the, not one, but two tax cuts he got passed through congress, or the roaring economy - and jobs - those tax cuts created. I wasn’t surprised when he killed the unending farce that is the Kyoto treaty (remember, the thing Al Gore and the Senate unanimously voted down under Clinton?), or when he killed U.S. involvement in the International Criminal Court, or when he told the UN they risked becoming irrelevent, or when he told the Congress and the world, “America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.” Not surprising.
I wasn’t surprised at all to watch him - in a foreign and hostile land - go rescue the Secret Service agent who was being detained and kept from protecting him. Or to see him shoot his cuffs, afterwards, and greet his host with a smile.
I was never surprised that he tried to “change the tone” or tried reaching across the aisle to invite onesuch as Ted Kennedy to help draft education reform, something none of his predecessors dared touch. Just as they never dared to try to reform social security or our energy policies. The feckless ones in Congress wouldn’t get the jobs done, unfortunately, but he is a president who at least tried to get something going on those “dangerous” issues. His senior prescription plan was unsurprising and it is helping lots of people.
I was not at all to surprised to see President Bush forego the “trembling lip photo-op” moment in which most world-leaders indulged after the Christmas Tsunami of 2004 in order to get real work done, to bring immediate help to that area by co-ordinating our own military (particularly our Naval support) with Australia and Japan. Stupid, stingy American. I was surprised, actually, to see him dance with free Georgians. I didn’t think he danced.
Let me tell you what has surprised me about George W. Bush. I have been surprised by his ability to keep from attacking-in-kind the “public servants” in Washington who - for five years - have not been able to speak of the American President with the respect he is due, by virtue of both his office and his humanity, because they are entralled with hate and owned by opportunism. I have been surprised that he has kept his committment to “changing the tone” even when it has long been clear that the only way the tone in Washington will ever change is if everyone named Bush or Clinton or Kennedy is cleared out and “career politicians” are shown the door and - it must be said - every university “School of Journalism” is converted to a daisy garden, maaaan. We are stardust. We are golden.
I wasn’t surprised when President Bush thought that New Orleans had dodged a bullet after Hurricane Katrina, and therefore let down his guard. After all, we all thought NOLA had done so. I wasn’t surprised that he had - similarly to his actions the year before, re Hurricane Charlie - asked the Democrat Governor of Louisiana (and the Mayor) to order evacuations and suggested to her that she put the issue under Fed control to speed up processes (she did not, btw for a long while). But I was surprised that, when the press picked and choosed their stories while launching an unprecedented, emotion-charged, often completely inaccurate (10,000 bodies!) attack on the President - the rising waters were all his fault and he was suddenly “the uncaring racist attempting genocide by indifference” the President did not fight back against the sea of made-up news and boilerplate, fantastic charges against him.
I was surprised, and what surprised me was the sense I had that Bush’s heart was broken. That he had done everything he could to keep faith with the nation, and that he could not believe that in a time of such terrible need, all some people could think of was, “how do we use this politically, how do we break Bush with this?” It can’t have helped that some of the hysteria was coming from the right as well as the left. Things changed after that, didn’t they? The press and the left doubled up their attacks, the far-right went very smug, and President Bush never has seemed to have regrouped his spirit.
A month later, I wasn’t surprised (although some - mostly the hard-right “I’m a Conservative before I’m anything and he’d better serve me” types - clearly were) when he nominated Harriett Miers to the SCOTUS. In fact, I’d predicted it. Up until that moment, every person President Bush had nominated to pretty much any position had won accolades from the beamish far-right, but Miers did not. She wasn’t one of their guys or gals. She wasn’t Luttig, she wasn’t Rogers-Brown. Harriet Miers? Damn that Bush! The denouncements came fast and furious and suddenly “the base” with which George W. Bush had not broken faith…broke faith with him. Suddenly they were as willing to call him a moron and an idiot as any KozKid.
Imagine that. Imagine being the guy who has given his base one splendid nominee after another, in all manner of posts, make a nomination he thinks appropriate only to find that “base” coming out with both guns, defaming his nominee and directing all manner of insult at himself. President Bush is nothing if not loyal; his loyalty is often his downfall. When he asked for a little trust (which he had surely earned) a little loyalty and a little faith, from “the base,” he got kicked in the groin, over and over again, for daring to think differently, for falling out of lockstep with his policy-wonk “betters.”
That had to be bitter, for him. At that point Bush, unchanged in essentials, might have wondered if his conservative “base” had become a bit over-confident and loose-hipped, so cock-sure of their majority (not that congress used it) so certain of their own brilliance that they were beginning to believe they didn’t need him; that he wasn’t conservative enough, after all, and that the next president was going to be the solid, “uncompassionate” conservative they’d really wanted all along. The president who had delivered one gift after another to his base asked them to trust him, and his base sneered.
Then of course, the DPW debacle was launched and once again the far-right, his “base” went beserk, again, for very dubious reasons. Buster was the one who pointed out to me, then, that in this matter President Bush was being entirely consistent with who he had always been and that his defense of the sale was not unsound, nor unprecedented. The right didn’t care! They stomped their feet and went DU again. Even Rush Limbaugh couldn’t control them. The left, on the other hand, which should have supported the president - they would have had he been anyone else - simply exploited what they could of it.
And now, the Great Big Immigration Imbroglio of ‘06 has turned “the base” quite vicious. President Bush is no longer simply a moron or an idiot to his base, he is a bad man. He is a bad American. He is a bad president. Everything he does now, is wrong. As yesterday’s WSJ pointed out, Bush is closer to the deified Ronald Reagan on this issue than anyone on the right wants to admit. And they’d never do to Reagan what they are doing to Bush. Let’s look at a few Reagan quotes on the nature of those “far-right” conservatives, mmkay?
‘When I began entering into the give and take of legislative bargaining in Sacramento, a lot of the most radical conservatives who had supported me during the election didn’t like it.
‘Compromise was a dirty word to them and they wouldn’t face the fact that we couldn’t get all of what we wanted today. They wanted all or nothing and they wanted it all at once. If you don’t get it all, some said, don’t take anything.
‘I’d learned while negotiating union contracts that you seldom got everything you asked for. And I agreed with FDR, who said in 1933: ‘I have no expectations of making a hit every time I come to bat. What I seek is the highest possible batting average.’
‘If you got seventy-five or eighty percent of what you were asking for, I say, you take it and fight for the rest later, and that’s what I told these radical conservatives who never got used to it.’
Mr. Reagan, I salute you. I did not vote for you. Twice. I came too late to appreciation of you. But sir, some of us have been saying the same thing to “the base” for a few weeks now. They’re still not listening. They won’t, I imagine, until they absolutely must. And perhaps it will take a staggering defeat for that to happen.
President Bush’s immigration policies have not changed materially since he was Governor of Texas. You folks knew that when you elected him, twice. He has not changed, cannot change, because his policies arise not from his poll numbers but from his convictions and his conscience. You used to love that about him. Can everything, everything that needs to be done BE done, and all as you would have it done, in the real world, a world of bitter bipartisanship and a corrupted press?
Some say that the GOP should consider “losing in ‘06 to win in ‘08.” Some conservatives say that they’re going to not vote - to sit out an election or vote for a third party candidate to “teach the GOP a lesson.”
The far-right gwwwwarks like a cracker-obsessed parrot: Bush has abandoned the base, he’s abandoned the base, he’s abandoned the base.
Ever stop to think maybe the president feels his base has abandoned him, that uncontent with 75%, they’ve simply moved beyond reason? Ever stop to think that while you’re calling the president every despicable name in the book and demanding his fealty or you’ll “teach him a lesson,” that perhaps there is a lesson you need to learn? That a good man, disinterested in merely laughing or crying for the camera for 8 years and looking to do a difficult job in the face of unprecedented hate, unprecedent speed of communication, unprecedented global instability, unprecedented backstabbing from within his own CIA, deserves some loyalty and the benefit of a doubt as he tries to bring you the 75% you so callously spit back at him as insufficient?
We do not know everything we think we know. Nothing is static; everything is in flux, and it is very likely that more is at work here, on many levels, than any of us can dream. There are things seen and unseen. Think about it.
Here is a question, and I’ll be writing on it some more during the week, but start thinking about it, now: HOW DO YOU RECEIVE A GOOD?
How you receive a good has a lot to do with whether any more “good” comes your way. The Conservatives got a “good” in 2000 and 2004; they’re receiving it very badly, indeed. I think the throwing-under-the-bus-of-George-W-Bush by “the base” is one of the most shameful things I have ever witnessed in all my years of watching politics, from both sides of the political spectrum. How do you receive a good?
President Bush has never surprised me. He is, in essentials, the man he ever was. It does not surprise me that he is a Christian man living a creed before he is a President, that he is a President before he is a Conservative. It seems to me precisely the right order of things.
You “base” have received a great good. You’ve forgotten it. Continue to do so at your - at all our - great peril.
Very nice. Thanks.
This title is boring and will not provoke the interest this article deserves. Is it possible to add after title: [Bush did not abandon us; we abandoned him]
Lousy wording. "Essential" President Bush presupposes the existence of a nonessential one as well, and such dubious thinking is for DU.
Stunning...brilliant. I have emailed copies to both my sons and several friends. I DO NOT send links to FR anymore because of all the hatred displayed here towards this great man.
I'm seldom surprised by him, because he does act from conscience, and I pretty much know where he is coming from, and can usually guess what he will do next.
And I thank God he was the man in office on 911.
Still, I also disagree with him on a number of issues I consider important. I don't mind saying so. Thats the way it works. You support the most conservative guy you can find, and then you push him to keep him from going weak on you, and then you push him harder to keep him from making some awful mistake or other.
There's a big difference between conservatives pushing him to keep him from going soft, or making a huge mistake, versus the DNC Left savaging him for precisely doing the right thing. If we don't push back he doesn't have the political cover he needs to oppose the political Left. If we're making noise, he knows we'll be in his corner if he does the right thing, and he knows we'll make a lot of noise if he tries too hard to compromise with the baddies.
I think thats the way its supposed to work.
It's a common formulation, indicating a look at the essence of a subject or person, as in: "The Essential C.S. Lewis" or "The Essential Plato." If an author were to write "The Great George Washingon," that would not "presuppose" the existence of a non-great Washington.
The spending orgy and going back on nation building is what broke faith with me.
Ever stop to think maybe the president feels his base has abandoned him, that uncontent with 75%, theyve simply moved beyond reason?
With 71% of the country abandoning him, Bush should examine the 'reasoning' that got him here.
" May 11, 2006, 9:12 pm Bush Dips Into the 20s President Bushs job-approval rating has fallen to its lowest mark of his presidency, according to a new Harris Interactive poll. Of 1,003 U.S. adults surveyed in a telephone poll, 29% think Mr. Bush is doing an excellent or pretty good job as president, down from 35% in April and significantly lower than 43% in January. Approval ratings for Congress overall also sank, and now stand at 18%.
Roughly one-quarter of U.S. adults say things in the country are going in the right direction, while 69% say things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track. This has been the trend since January, when 33% said the nation was heading in the right direction. Iraq remains a key concern for the general public, as 28% of Americans said they consider Iraq to be one of the top two most important issues the government should address, up from 23% in April. The immigration debate also prompted 16% of Americans to consider it a top issue, down from 19% last month, but still sharply higher from 4% in March."
Those aren't Morning in America numbers.
Don't sweat it. History will vindicate his decision in Iraq.
Clearly, you do not 'get' the theme of this sobering reminder...that a lot of republicans are acting like spoiled brats that, the minute they see the game not going good,according to their rules, pick up their marbles in a snit and run home to mama
or perhaps your reading comprehension was turned off...
Thanks Howlin. I'm so glad President Bush is our president right now.
Sorry,but something happened on 9/11/01 that kind of changed the outlook on nation building.
I'm printing that out - wish all conservatives would - to read and reread, to remind ourselves that we have gotten more from this president than any in any of our lifetimes -
I am tired, disheartened, disgusted with conservatives who act (are?) no better than the enemy DUers in the way they attack this man who has given so much - most of which we will never even know.
I wonder, sometimes, how he keeps on getting up in the morning and keeps giving and giving and giving...in the face of such outright, self-righteous prigs.
Thanks for the ping, Howlin. This is very good and should please everyone but the single-issue zealots who are too bullheaded to realize they're being used by the MSM and Democrats to split the GOP just in time for the upcoming elections.
Wheres the pic with the little girl whispering in his ear ?
Thats the one i dont have in my collection yet !
Anyone have that one ?
What a lovely piece..the dose will love this!
Thank you. It is so refreshing to see something that summarizes what Dubya has accomplished. We have forgotten that in all the righteous rhetoric.
Oh, the "purists" and UNAPPEASEABLES will trash it, but that's their problem.
Having symbolically LED the Minuteman Caravan to D.C. I still love this President and am praying for him. I do urge him to be more pro-active on our borders but I want him to remain in the Oval Office.
As I say, in other words, on my site.
STANDING OVATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What an excellent portrayal of serious truths! God bless President Bush and God bless those who stand with him. BUMP!
AWESOME! JUST AWESOME! . . . The Anchoress is my favorite blogger too!
It sure is! Many thanks for the ping.
I completely agree, CWOJackson. I've done the same and feel the same.
Well said. I thank you.
I suppose I could get in trouble for insistent "bumping", but your thread, this article, needs to be read by everyone, again and again.
What a treat!
I read you post. I believe you are wrong. I don't expect you to rationally reconsider your comments. Good-bye.
thanks, Howlin. I agree with our Prime Minister John Howard...'be careful what you wish for...' he said.
Thank You, John Howard
John Howard, prime minister of Australia, is doing a world tour. At a stop in Chicago, he told the unmitigable truth, as headlined in the Age newspaper on Friday morning: "World would be a darker place if not for US: Howard."
His actually words to the Chicago Council on Foreign Relations were even better: "To the voices of anti-Americanism around the world, to those who shout 'Yankee go home', let me offer some quiet advice: be careful what you wish for."
It is a reminder that America is a big country, big enough to withstand the attcks of 9/11 -- the trillion-dollar damage to its main stock exchange and the near loss of its military headquarters.
Big enough to absorb the loss of an entire city.
Big enough to have 11 million illegal aliens in its midst and still argue whether welfare benefits for them should be cut off.
Big enough to host the most anti-American organization in the world, the United Nations.
"Without American leadership, the trials and tragedies of recent years could be but a prelude of darker days to come. With American leadership, we can build a better world not just for us, but for all."
The Iraq War is very unpopular in his nation, yet Prime Minister Howard said, "Australia is with you. We will stay the course. We will finish the job."
I appreciate a world leader who is willing to still stand up for the land of the free and the home of the brave.
Thanks for this and the many pings, Howlin. I don't often get to them but when I do they're well worth it. His stances on immigration and concessions to spending grate, but I give the President the benefit of the doubt, even on these issues. He possesses much better and a vastly greater scope of information that we do.
It's really disheartening seeing the viciousness that routinely surfaces in these Bush-related threads. Some have an odd character about them that suggests (as many have said) there are disruptors at work stoking the flames. But too many true conservatives, on both sides of the issue, get awfully personal. One thing everyone should agree on: If the dems get Congress in November, the balance of the President's final term will be a REAL nightmare.
It is harder than one might think to find a good and decent man...and then to stick with him. I can do that.
Interesting essay and very much on point. Too few try to express the good things the President has done but many from across the spectrum spare no opportunity to bash him for his less than perfect performance.
Dubya seems like a very nice fellow and I think well of him. But I do wish he took the immigration problem more seriously. It really bothers me.
Thank you. I love President Bush.
Gunslingr - You use the term "spending orgy". Can you tell me what the most money went to that you disagree with or is that just "bash-Bush" terminology? I know you understand 9/11 and Katrina has added billions to your "spending orgy" but what else.....other than the WOT?
No other man could have led this country post 9/11 - we would have crumbled for a while if not for his leadership. If you dare, and can take an open mind, go to President Bush's words from 9/11 A good reminder.
It's a great read! :-)
Howard is a great man and a wonderful leader.
I'm honored to have him as CIC / POTUS.
Our base of late has been blinded and have shown a true lack of loyalty to a truly good man. Loyalty is something you give or show simply when you agree with everything.
Maybe it's just me, but we seem to expect so much more from this president than anyone expected of clinton. What did clinton do to fix social security, illegal immigration, terrorism, our high dependence on foreign oil? Nothing, that I can recall. The only thing that clinton had going for him was a robust economy thanks to an overly inflated nasdaq and even that tanked by the time he left.
I totally agree with you. President Bush is a president first and a people pleaser last. Republicans act as though he is some kind of traitor every time he supports a policy that the party as a whole does not favor. (The Dems aren't even worth mentioning; they hated him before he even got elected and had a chance to prove himself).
Your picture of him getting in the plane is heartbreaking after the way his heroism and courage has affected so many lives. Unfortunately, most people never realize what they've got until it's gone. Election 2008 is going to be depressing. I'll have to find someone else to vote for. Granted, I don't agree with every aspect of Bush's vision for America, but I admire him. When I look at his face, I see a man who follows his conscience and wants to do what is best for his country, even when his country is primarily interested in dragging him through the mud.
Thank you for posting this.