Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Riley: Those carrying guns during emergency will be stopped
wwltv ^ | 06/09/06 | wwl

Posted on 06/09/2006 6:56:33 PM PDT by Ellesu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Ghengis

Would he get the point if a 5 gallon pail of tar and a lb bag of feathers were delivered to his office?


21 posted on 06/09/2006 8:44:27 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope

thanks...I remember a video of an elderly lady with a handgun being ripped out of her hand, being forced to leave her place.

I also remember a couple of videos of a band of armed citizens that the police & feds totally avoided.


22 posted on 06/09/2006 8:47:44 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
I also remember a couple of videos of a band of armed citizens that the police & feds totally avoided.

There's a lesson in there somewhere.

L

23 posted on 06/09/2006 8:59:42 PM PDT by Lurker ("They still see you as the infidel, the other, and they'll still kill you. " Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Damn.

This Riley dude has backpedaled some from what he was saying in yesterday's reports, but oddly enough, today's statements seem even more repugnant, and at the same time, bizarre.

When LA passed it's law against confiscation during disasters did they include language that made violation a crime?

A lot of states have laws that prohibit their own governments from doing things like that, but it seems too few of them carry any sort of penalty. The state confiscating legally possessed goods from a citizen is, in fact, armed robbery and ought to be treated as such in law.
24 posted on 06/09/2006 9:08:19 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (Oregon - a pro-militia and firearms state that looks just like Afghanistan .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
Total BS! How are you supposed to prove ownership unless it's a pistol you have a carry permit for?

I am confused by your statement, what is a pistol you have a carry permit for?

I have a carry permit, I can carry whatever I want to.

25 posted on 06/09/2006 9:11:41 PM PDT by c-b 1 (Reporting from behind enemy lines, in occupied AZTLAN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Legally - Right, you always remember where the receipt for the pistol you bought 10 years ago is in a flood or hurricane. "Honey, you hold the baby and her bottle while I look in the roll-top desk for my gun's receipt."


26 posted on 06/09/2006 9:17:53 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

This is B.S. I had a video sent to me of two burly fat NOLA policeman tackling and taking away a little old ladies pistol in her home. With her claiming she was o.k. and did not want to be evacuated.


27 posted on 06/09/2006 9:51:05 PM PDT by rock58seg (A minority of Republican RINO's are making a majority of Republicans look like fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
How are you supposed to prove ownership unless it's a pistol you have a carry permit for?

What? I have one permit which allows me to carry concealed any weapon I own.

28 posted on 06/09/2006 10:09:10 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
I believe it works that way in NY or at least NYC. I think some other places as well.

It appears you are using conjecture, not facts. There is a difference between a permit to purchase, versus a permit to carry.

29 posted on 06/09/2006 10:13:02 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Hell, that's nothing, in New London, CT they take peoples homes whether or not you can prove its yours.

I'd put an "LOL" but it's not a laughing matter.

30 posted on 06/09/2006 10:19:03 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

His comments are madness self delusional, pathetic, sad.

Wm


31 posted on 06/09/2006 10:20:16 PM PDT by WLR ("fugit impius nemine persequente iustus autem quasi leo confidens absque terrore erit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Search4Truth
This is a fantasy on the part of phony tough guys with badges. These cops are more accustomed to wrestling guns away from little old ladies, then they are fighting real men.

Pretty much my first thought as well. NO is so corrupt that I wouldn't trust the cops to do the right thing more times than not anyway. It'll definitely be interesting when they run into a gaggle of thugs.

32 posted on 06/09/2006 10:20:55 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
Let's hope that NO stays out of harm's way until this buffoon is out of power. He's just begging for blood to be spilled.
33 posted on 06/09/2006 10:23:33 PM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Disputed the fact that the cops disarmed citizens?? Didn't this dope see the video of the jackbooted thug body-slamming the old lady? What a bunch of lying police crap.


34 posted on 06/09/2006 10:27:14 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a; Ellesu
Riley also disputed accounts that police had gone into homes and disarmed residents.

it's on video...is this guy a moron ?


"Pay no attention. That video is totally false."

35 posted on 06/09/2006 10:28:24 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

Riley also disputed accounts that police had gone into homes and disarmed residents.

Riley said that police did go into homes that had been abandoned or damaged after Katrina and,
Look! That shutter is broken, we're going in!


36 posted on 06/10/2006 4:44:45 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu
I bought most of my guns in the 60's and 70's when the Second Amendment was respected and gun control was not even considered in Amerika (yes, that's Amerika).

Who the hell thought back then that you would have to keep your receipts, a certification of a gift, an inheritance of the gun or any other paperwork so that you could prove ownership in the "brave new world" of today!

In a true emergency I will shoot to kill anyone who tries to take the only means I have to protect my life, family and property, and then I will shoot the ones who come for me for protecting myself after that.

Never, never in my earlier years in the America I used to know, would I have ever thought that that was a possibility.
37 posted on 06/10/2006 5:27:20 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Would he get the point if a 5 gallon pail of tar and a lb bag of feathers were delivered to his office?

He'd use that as an excuse to raid a "compound" in the area.

38 posted on 06/10/2006 5:53:00 AM PDT by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ellesu

"I have the proof of ownership right here in the chamber, want it?"


39 posted on 06/10/2006 6:09:18 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I believe it works that way in NY or at least NYC. I think some other places as well.

---It appears you are using conjecture, not facts. ---

Here's a link to a NYC permit:

http://www.packing.org/state/new_york_city/image.php?stateimage=64

It clearly lists the weapons the holder is authorised to carry. I don't know how many other permits are this way. I know Montana's is not. I don't think any police are going to take a weapon from a permit holder on less ohter circumstances are involved, like intoxication, ect.


40 posted on 06/10/2006 9:24:01 AM PDT by claudiustg (¡En español, por favor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson