Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/09/2006 6:56:36 PM PDT by Ellesu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Ellesu
lawfully in possession of it

The Constitution should work in this instance.

2 posted on 06/09/2006 6:58:54 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

How am I supposed to prove that the gun is mine? Should I carry a receipt with me at all times? What if I borrowed it from a friend?


3 posted on 06/09/2006 6:59:09 PM PDT by edik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

So the police coniscated guns from abandoned homes because they could have been used as weapons.

Did they take th kitchen knives too?

This is beyond ridiculous--this is people's private property. The follow up questions--what have you done to get this private property back into the hands of their owners.

If nothing, that is illegal confiscation.


4 posted on 06/09/2006 7:05:04 PM PDT by exit82 (If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
Prove it is theirs? As in a syllogism? Is a receipt proof, or does he mean government seal of approval? Because the right...
5 posted on 06/09/2006 7:07:09 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

---Riley said that in another emergency situation, officers would check people on the street in possession of guns and will not take the weapons unless they have a criminal record, are mentally ill, or unable to prove they own the weapon.---

Total BS! How are you supposed to prove ownership unless it's a pistol you have a carry permit for?


6 posted on 06/09/2006 7:07:10 PM PDT by claudiustg (¡En español, por favor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Hell, that's nothing, in New London, CT they take peoples homes whether or not you can prove its yours.


7 posted on 06/09/2006 7:11:45 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
I wonder what action Riley recommends if law-abiding citizens find that their lives and the lives of their families depend upon their firearms, but somehow they are without the proof demanded by Riley. Should a law-abiding person allow himself to be illegally disarmed, putting his family at risk, or should he take some other action?

One might also ask what proof of ownership of firearms is carried by New Orleans law enforcement. I don't recall seeing any firearm serial numbers on a policeman's badge. Shall it be lawful for citizens to disarm policemen who do not provide proof of ownership?

Will the police be disarming each other due to lack of proof of ownership?

When I was in the Army, I carried a military ID, but no proof of firearms ownership. Will Riley be disarming any National Guard troops he encounters? If the President visits the disaster area, what proof of ownership will the Secret Service be required to carry?

9 posted on 06/09/2006 7:26:54 PM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Well, well. This is clever.

Policeman: Let me see your permit and reciept.

Gun Owner: Okay, here you go.

Policeman: Looks, good, everything checks out. We just need to check our records to see if your a felon or crazy.

Gun Owner: No problem.

Policeman: Well, there is a problem. You see, we're in the midst of a natural disaster, and we can't even get ahold of dispatch much less run names against the database.

Gun Owner: That could be a problem.

Policeman: Tell you what, you just give me your gun and you can be on your way. Otherwise you can wait here for a few days while whoever gets the computers working. If they're even still in town.

Gun Owner: Tough choice. Give up my gun or starve to death right here?


10 posted on 06/09/2006 7:39:45 PM PDT by sattelite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
“They have a right to carry the guns, but they have to prove it is theirs,” said Riley.

Typical nanny state BS. Again telling law abiding citizens they must prove a negative.

My guns are 25 years old. I don't have the original receipts. So, am I supposed to "prove" that I don't have a criminal record, or didn't steal my guns? All of this in a lawless, disaster situation where I must protect my family and property? IOW, the state doesn't have to prove I am doing anything wrong, I have to prove I am not?

And I should believe libs when they say I don't need guns to protect myself. From whom, criminals or the government?

15 posted on 06/09/2006 8:18:53 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s...you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
Riley also disputed accounts that police had gone into homes and disarmed residents.

it's on video...is this guy a moron ?
17 posted on 06/09/2006 8:21:50 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Tyranical, power hungry idiot. He's asking to get his lackeys shot.


18 posted on 06/09/2006 8:28:54 PM PDT by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
Damn.

This Riley dude has backpedaled some from what he was saying in yesterday's reports, but oddly enough, today's statements seem even more repugnant, and at the same time, bizarre.

When LA passed it's law against confiscation during disasters did they include language that made violation a crime?

A lot of states have laws that prohibit their own governments from doing things like that, but it seems too few of them carry any sort of penalty. The state confiscating legally possessed goods from a citizen is, in fact, armed robbery and ought to be treated as such in law.
24 posted on 06/09/2006 9:08:19 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (Oregon - a pro-militia and firearms state that looks just like Afghanistan .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Legally - Right, you always remember where the receipt for the pistol you bought 10 years ago is in a flood or hurricane. "Honey, you hold the baby and her bottle while I look in the roll-top desk for my gun's receipt."


26 posted on 06/09/2006 9:17:53 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

This is B.S. I had a video sent to me of two burly fat NOLA policeman tackling and taking away a little old ladies pistol in her home. With her claiming she was o.k. and did not want to be evacuated.


27 posted on 06/09/2006 9:51:05 PM PDT by rock58seg (A minority of Republican RINO's are making a majority of Republicans look like fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

His comments are madness self delusional, pathetic, sad.

Wm


31 posted on 06/09/2006 10:20:16 PM PDT by WLR ("fugit impius nemine persequente iustus autem quasi leo confidens absque terrore erit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
Let's hope that NO stays out of harm's way until this buffoon is out of power. He's just begging for blood to be spilled.
33 posted on 06/09/2006 10:23:33 PM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Disputed the fact that the cops disarmed citizens?? Didn't this dope see the video of the jackbooted thug body-slamming the old lady? What a bunch of lying police crap.


34 posted on 06/09/2006 10:27:14 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

Riley also disputed accounts that police had gone into homes and disarmed residents.

Riley said that police did go into homes that had been abandoned or damaged after Katrina and,
Look! That shutter is broken, we're going in!


36 posted on 06/10/2006 4:44:45 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu
I bought most of my guns in the 60's and 70's when the Second Amendment was respected and gun control was not even considered in Amerika (yes, that's Amerika).

Who the hell thought back then that you would have to keep your receipts, a certification of a gift, an inheritance of the gun or any other paperwork so that you could prove ownership in the "brave new world" of today!

In a true emergency I will shoot to kill anyone who tries to take the only means I have to protect my life, family and property, and then I will shoot the ones who come for me for protecting myself after that.

Never, never in my earlier years in the America I used to know, would I have ever thought that that was a possibility.
37 posted on 06/10/2006 5:27:20 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ellesu

"I have the proof of ownership right here in the chamber, want it?"


39 posted on 06/10/2006 6:09:18 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson