Posted on 06/09/2006 11:15:51 PM PDT by sully777
A real Bond wouldn't leave fingerprints on his car hood would he?
Nothing can top "his" legendary performances on Celebrity Jeopardy.
Connery: I have to ask you about 'The Penis Mightier'
Trabek: That's 'The Pen is Mightier'
Connery: Gussie it up however you want, the question is does it work?
The AFI has given this award to some nice people lately, but they certainly haven't had the careers of those they gave in the early days.
The earliest awards went to:John Ford, James Cagney, Orson Welles, William Wyler, Alfred Hitchcock, Jimmy Stewart, John Huston, etc. I don't think Connery's career matches up--though his stature as an icon/celebrity does.
Connery will always be the quintessential James Bond.
Who cares???? He's TEH SEXXXXXXY!!!!!eleven!!!
A party? Pity I wasn't invited.
It was Dana Broccoli who decided that an unknown beefcake named Sean Connery was the right man to play Bond in Dr No (1962), the first of the Bond films. Connery had come to Cubby Broccoli’s attention playing a burly farmhand in a Walt Disney film about leprechauns.“One day,” Dana Broccoli later recalled, “Cubby called me and said: ‘Could you come down and look at this Disney leprechaun film, Darby O’Gill and the Little People, at the Goldwyn Studios? I don’t know if this Sean Connery guy has any sex appeal.’ I saw that face and the way he moved and talked, and I said: ‘Cubby, he’s fabulous!’ He was just perfect, he had star material right there.”
Few men could make this line sexy, but reading it and knowing it comes from him has sexy on full throttle.
I'm a guy, what would I care about that? This isn't DU, after all. ;)
Sean Connery
Before I'd criticize, just imagine what it's going to be like 40 years from now when the likes of Ben Affleck and Brad Pitt get Lifetime Achievement Awards. Even in subpar films, Connery always rises above the material.
I just call 'em like I see them. I don't see any need to give awards to good actors who've made so many bad movies just because someday there will be worse actors with worse movies getting them. I don't believe in grading on a curve.
I read somewhere that he hasn`t visited Scotland in the past few years and will not until it is completely independent from England. Here, I found one reference to this on IMDB....
"Declared in 2003 that he would not return home until Scotland is an independent country. He believes this can still happen during his lifetime."
Uh, does he expect pigs to fly as well?
Some more bizarre trivia from IMDB.......
Formerly worked as a coffin polisher.
Was once stopped for speeding by an officer named Sergeant James Bond.
Was the original choice to play Sybock in Star Trek V: The Final Frontier (1989). The words in the film "Sha Ka Ree" are a play on of his name.
Wears a toupee in all the James Bond movies. He started losing his hair at the age of 21. Privately and in most other movies, he wears none.
Started smoking when he was nine years old.
He's got star quality, something I think is sadly missing nowadays. That charisma that rivets your attention onscreen.
He's been in a lot of dumb movies. But you know someone's good when you can say, "He was the best thing in it".
Nice!!!
I'd rather be giving awards to good actors in bad films rather than bad actors in good films or bad films. If you wish to see an excellent film in which he gave an Oscar-calibre performance (which was far better than what got him an Oscar with "The Untouchables"), see "The Offence." The scenes between Connery and the late Ian Bannen (who also similarly should've gotten an Oscar) were riveting. I look at films like that and see why he is rightly being honored with a Lifetime Achievement Award.
He exemplefies what John Huston valued--"interest". You watch him in his best movies--The Man Who Would Be King, for example--and you want to follow where he goes.
One reason we don't have actors with star power anymore is the abundance of People and Entertainment Tonight-type media. There were always movie magazines but most of them were filled with puff pieces. These days we know so much about these actors that we can't possibly get into their characters--we keep seeing THEM on the screen, not the characters.
He's been in a lot of dumb movies. But you know someone's good when you can say, "He was the best thing in it".
I disagree, there is always someone who's "the best thing" in a bad movie--even a lousy actor can be the best thing in a really lousy movie, which isn't saying much. And Connery's been bad or boring in a lot of movies--Zardoz, anyone?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.