Posted on 06/26/2006 4:33:19 AM PDT by highlander_UW
Since the NY Times believes it's in the public interest to put us all at increased risk at the hands of terrorists, and since untold millions will now have to be expended to develop new methods to track terrorist financing I think that a New York city location such as the NY Times building would be better used for some other purpose. And it would seem ironic justice if the same faulty ruling brought to us by the liberal judges be used to rid NY of the terrorist aiding Times. So my challenge is (and be clean) what better use should the Times location be put to?
Hazardous Waste dump!
I believe the Times already has used eminent domain to its OWN advantage by getting the city to take over a prime piece of real estate for its new headquarters.
.50 cal BMG Super Store and Indoor Range
Maybe they can make it a package deal and throw in those big rolls of paper that they'd otherwise waste.
Now I like that idea! What liberal could argue against repatriating land in NY to the Indians?
A replacement for Gitmo, or use it to detain domestic terrorists. That way the writers and editors can stay.
Turn it into a radical mosque.
That way, there won't be as much anti-American activity.
I have been advocating for many months the renaming of Times Square. For such a place to bear the disgraceful name speaks volumes about the people who populate New York.
I thought Rudy Square might be a suitable new name.
I would like to see pictures of citizens with pitchforks and torches.
It'd have to be filmed in black and white.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.