1 posted on
06/27/2006 2:19:37 PM PDT by
neverdem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: neverdem
Day 1 of UN Gun Summit.
Guns suck, we hate them. The US should give us more money.
Day 2222 of UN Gun summit. See day 1 notes.
2 posted on
06/27/2006 2:21:22 PM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
To: neverdem
We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons.MOLON LABE, MF.
3 posted on
06/27/2006 2:21:32 PM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: neverdem
From my cold, dead hands.....
4 posted on
06/27/2006 2:23:49 PM PDT by
ODC-GIRL
(Proudly serving our Nation's Homeland Defense)
To: neverdem
So, an organization of Governments, in full view and total awareness of the history of the 20th century had decided that
civilian use of guns is the problem.
That makes sense!!
6 posted on
06/27/2006 2:27:38 PM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: neverdem
"We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons. "
That include the U.N. " Peacekeepers " ?
8 posted on
06/27/2006 2:28:06 PM PDT by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
To: neverdem
...nor do we wish to deny law-abiding citizens their right to bear arms in accordance with their national laws."We wish to change national laws such that law-abiding citizens can no longer bear arms in accordance with their national laws."
9 posted on
06/27/2006 2:28:31 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: neverdem
Did they kick it off with a 21-gun salute?
10 posted on
06/27/2006 2:28:35 PM PDT by
Thom Pain
(Supporting the Constitution is NOT right wing. It is centrist.)
To: neverdem
We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons."Our view of an ideal situation was Saddam Hussein's Iraq."
11 posted on
06/27/2006 2:30:10 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Enemy Action
12 posted on
06/27/2006 2:31:16 PM PDT by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: neverdem
Another excellent reason to keep Rudy in NOOYAWK!
13 posted on
06/27/2006 2:31:34 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(LET ME DIE ON MY FEET, IN MY SWAMP)
To: neverdem
If the UN armed everybody it might be of a little use.
The tyrants running the UN and most of its members would quake in their boots because only armed people can do away with those tyrants.
14 posted on
06/27/2006 2:32:47 PM PDT by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: neverdem
Get the UN OUT of the US now!
They are discussing overriding our constitution.
We may not be able to stop what they discuss but we don't have to be host country to them.
15 posted on
06/27/2006 2:34:29 PM PDT by
weegee
(If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
To: neverdem
"In our view, the issue of ammunition should also be addressed in the context of the Program of Action because in the absence of ammunition, small arms and light weapons pose no danger. A refreshing bit of honesty.
18 posted on
06/27/2006 2:36:50 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: neverdem
Ironic. I keep guns just because of the existence of the UN.
To: neverdem
the best and brightest minds in the global gun ban movement. The average IQ of the group must be around what? 90?
20 posted on
06/27/2006 2:38:22 PM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: neverdem
22 posted on
06/27/2006 2:47:30 PM PDT by
IAGreywolf
("When you're putting down this Country, Hoss, you're walking on the fight'n side of me!")
To: neverdem
It was only a year or so ago when Kofi's security squad was busted for having full-auto HK sub guns in NYC. The UN doesn't think it is subject to any laws.
23 posted on
06/27/2006 2:47:39 PM PDT by
Sender
("Why, by God, I actually pity those poor sons-of-b*tches we're going up against. By God, I do".)
To: neverdem
UN. Biggest waste of real estate in America.
To: neverdem; Joe Brower
The statement from Indonesias representative was perhaps the clearest example of what these countries are aiming for. We believe that no armed group outside of the State should be allowed to bear weapons. We also believe that regulating civilian possession of Small Arms/Light Weapons will enhance our efforts to prevent its misuse. In our view, the issue of ammunition should also be addressed in the context of the Program of Action because in the absence of ammunition, small arms and light weapons pose no danger.
You Indonesian turd...you son of a mugwump...you ignorant slimeball...YOU and the mincing minions of government functionaries, diplomats and bureaucrats are the danger...it is pieces of sh*t like you who killed approximately 70 MILLION civilians in the last century...after disarming them. Get out of my country--you don't deserve to breathe the same air as Americans.
28 posted on
06/27/2006 2:52:15 PM PDT by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must)
To: neverdem
No one, including the UN, will ever take my guns away from me.
Don't believe me?
Try me.
29 posted on
06/27/2006 2:53:02 PM PDT by
Whitehorse
(I love my guns!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson