Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Yates knew killings were wrong, deputy says
STATESMAN.COM | Thursday, July 13, 2006 | By Angela K. Brown AP

Posted on 07/12/2006 10:23:57 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad

Yates knew killings were wrong, deputy says

Law officer heard Yates and psychiatrist talking in jail, according to testimony.

By Angela K. Brown

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Thursday, July 13, 2006

HOUSTON — The day after drowning her five children in a bathtub, Andrea Yates told a jail psychiatrist that she had decided to do it the night before and that she knew it was wrong, a sheriff's deputy who overheard their interview testified Wednesday.

"She said, 'I considered using a knife, but that would be too bloody. I considered using a gun, but that would be too noisy. I decided that drowning would be the safest way to take them into the next world,' " Deputy Michael Stephens told jurors in Yates' second capital murder trial...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: babies; crime; evil; murder; sane; yates
Now why didn't the shrink testify to this...
1 posted on 07/12/2006 10:23:59 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/07/13yates.html More Harry Lee Wilson, an El Paso pediatric pathologist who reviewed the autopsy photos and Yates' police confession, testified that Yates was organized, methodical and deceptive the day of the deaths.

He said she killed Noah last because she knew that he would struggle the most and could have alerted the others.

WHAT AN EVIL, SANE WOMAN.

2 posted on 07/12/2006 10:25:58 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad
Because the SHRINK LIED !!!

Ferguson also told jurors earlier that she doesn't think she asked Yates whether she knew that killing her children was wrong. But Stephens said Yates was answering Ferguson's question when she said she knew what she did was wrong.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME on the SHRINK.

3 posted on 07/12/2006 10:27:27 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

Amazing that they got this in and didn't claim "Dr. Client" privilege.

Perhaps it was allowed in because the SHRINK wanted him there because she was afraid Ms. Yates would hurt her. Thus the shink breached her dr. client privilege.


4 posted on 07/12/2006 10:29:30 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad

That's just beyond disgusting. Fry her.


5 posted on 07/13/2006 1:26:07 AM PDT by blogblogblogging
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson