Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran says it will deliver response Aug. 22
AP via Yahoo ^

Posted on 07/20/2006 6:51:11 AM PDT by nuconvert

Iran says it will deliver response Aug. 22

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer

Iran said Thursday it would formally respond on Aug. 22 to a Western package of incentives aimed at resolving the standoff over its suspect nuclear program — the first time the Islamic republic has set a specific date for its reply.

The Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security decision-making body, also threatened that the country would reconsider its nuclear policies if sanctions were imposed by the United Nations.

The council did not elaborate, but Iranian officials repeatedly have suggested that Tehran may withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and stop cooperating with U.N. inspectors.

"The package of incentives requires a logical time to study it ... Aug. 22 has been set for declaring (our) views," the council said in a statement read on state-run television.

"In case the path of confrontation is chosen instead of the path of dialogue ... and Iran's definite rights are threatened, then there will be no option for Iran but to reconsider its nuclear policies."

The statement came a day after Russia said the U.N. Security Council is in no rush to pressure Iran over its nuclear program, striking a more conciliatory tone than the United States as diplomats began discussing a resolution to put legal muscle behind demands that Tehran suspend uranium enrichment.

The United States and some of its allies accuse Iran of seeking to produce highly enriched uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons. Tehran says its nuclear program is peaceful and aimed at generating electricity.

In Thursday's statement, Iran said it plans to generate 20,000 megawatts of electricity through nuclear energy in the next 20 years.

The Western nations on June 6 offered Iran a package of incentives — including advanced technology and possibly even nuclear research reactors — if Tehran suspended enrichment.

But the frustrated powers agreed last week to send Iran back to the U.N. Security Council for possible punishment, saying Tehran had given no sign it would bargain in earnest over its nuclear ambitions.

Iran has said the incentives package was an "acceptable basis" for negotiations.

Hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad initially said Iran would respond to the package in mid-August, but the republic then pushed back its response to late August. Thursday's statement was the first time a specific date was set.

The United States has accused Iran of stalling while it continues to pursue suspect technology, but Tehran accused Washington on Thursday of putting up "obstacles."

The Iranian council said special committees in key state agencies were still studying the offer by the United States, Britain, China, France, Russia and Germany, and it invited the United States and its allies to return to the negotiating table.

It said it was "surprising" that the United States was creating obstacles for a negotiated settlement while Iran was seriously studying the offer.

"Iran is not after tension, but if others push things toward tension and create problems, then all will face problems. Iran believes dialogue is the most logical solution. It is serious in this path. We want the other side to return to the negotiating table," the statement said.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran is committed to a negotiated settlement through diplomacy. The United States, by changing the path of talks toward the Security Council, is trying to create obstacles."

A senior Iranian lawmaker said Tuesday the country's parliament was preparing to debate withdrawal from the nonproliferation treaty if the U.N. Security Council adopts a resolution that would force Tehran to suspend uranium enrichment.

Withdrawal from the treaty could end all international oversight of Iran's nuclear program.

In February, Iran for the first time produced its first batch of low-enriched uranium, using a cascade of 164 centrifuges. The process of uranium enrichment can be used to generate electricity or in building a bomb, depending on the level of enrichment.

Iran has said it will never give up its right under the treaty to enrich uranium and produce nuclear fuel, but it has indicated it may temporarily suspend large-scale activities to ease tensions.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 082206; august22; eu; geopolitics; iran; irannukes; islam; muhammadsminions; proliferation; un; unres1696; unsecuritycouncil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Westbrook

If so...there will be no Iran on August 23.


21 posted on 07/20/2006 7:53:07 AM PDT by RockinRight (She rocks my world, and I rock her world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
It is my suspicion that their response will consist of a nuclear detonation, either as a test, or worse.

I think you're right.

22 posted on 07/20/2006 8:09:32 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (You can't qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it-Sherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

And a great big thanks from the civilized world to that fricking idiot Jimma Carter.


23 posted on 07/20/2006 8:11:35 AM PDT by newcthem (This is the final crusade, there are only two sides: pick one.(Brought to you by the Infidel Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

The 22 Aug date was announced a couple weeks ago. Any idea if that date is otherwise significant to Iranians?


24 posted on 07/20/2006 8:13:02 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Here is some advanced intelligence regarding the response:

"Kill all infidels"


25 posted on 07/20/2006 8:15:43 AM PDT by observer5 ("Better violate the rights of a few sometimes, than of all always!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newcthem

Militant Islam would be an annoyance if it were not for that a$$.


26 posted on 07/20/2006 8:29:26 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

We need to land a (non-nuclear) ballistic missile launched from a submarine in their midst with the message that we can turn their country into glass in less than 30 minutes and our trigger finger is getting very itchy.


27 posted on 07/20/2006 8:30:09 AM PDT by ZeitgeistSurfer (The Democrats solution is poison. When the patient is dying, their solution - more poison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: badpacifist

I knew that date had to mean something.


28 posted on 07/20/2006 8:46:00 AM PDT by Just Lori (To everything, there is a season.........Ecclesiastes, 3:1-8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZeitgeistSurfer
We need to land a (non-nuclear) ballistic missile launched from a submarine in their midst with the message that we can turn their country into glass in less than 30 minutes and our trigger finger is getting very itchy.

Won't work.

They already know this.

Amadinejad, and the other adherants to his weird sect, believe that the Mahdi ("the Twelfth Imam") will provide supernatural protection from their enemies in the apocalypse to come.

.

29 posted on 07/20/2006 8:47:44 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
There are a couple of theories out there. One is that Aug 22 corresponds to the date in the muslim calender that Saladin captured Jerusalem. On the Western calendar, that date is October 2, but the islamic calendar is a lunar one, so the months move around compared to ours (they don't have a 365 day year).


The other is that Aug. 22 is the date the Shah entered Iran in the 50's. I don't know if that one is right, and tend to lean to the former explanation. There have been quite a few threads on this date, and I might have missed a better explanation.
30 posted on 07/20/2006 8:58:05 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005
Iran may demand sanctions against Israel or even inspections of Israel's Dimona facilities to confirm the existence of nuclear weapons. But such demands won't have any impact on the key power centers in this confrontation. France is not a key supporter of Israel now, so if France turns against Israel then Israel hasn't lost much and the situation hasn't fundamentally changed. Any Iranian demands aren't going to change the position of the US, Britain, Germany, Russia, or China and thus when Iran is done venting its frustrations over the powerful Israeli nuclear arsenal, everyone will look at Iran and say "are you finished now?" and that's about it. The situation will be unchanged: nobody outside of Iran and a few other small countries wants Iran to acquire nuclear weapons, and the rest of the world has the power to shut down Iran's nuclear program, one way or another.

So all the rantings from Iran are just like a criminal gang leader yelling out of his house at the police who have him surrounded and are moving in to arrest him. The fun-sized psycho in Iran is deluding himself that somehow he's going to win a military confrontation against all the major military powers in the world. It appears to be difficult for these Iranian leaders to face up to reality. They are so used to calling the shots, telling everyone else what to do, and doing whatever they want in Iran, and now the big world powers are telling them "no, you can't build nukes." So far, they're in denial of reality and refusing to face up to the inevitable conclusion of this confrontation.

31 posted on 07/20/2006 9:13:06 AM PDT by defenderSD ("Rise early, work hard, strike oil." - J. Paul Getty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
It is my suspicion that their response will consist of a nuclear detonation, either as a test, or worse.

I doubt that Iran will test a nuke if it gets one. They know that a test would alert Israel that they have the bomb, and that the next thing on the program would be a mushroom cloud rising over the heap of rubble that was formerly Tehran. I think the first we will know of Iran having the bomb will be when it either explodes or fails to explode in Israel.

Either way that will spell the end of Iran as a functioning nation, because Israel's response will be devastating. Several nukes exploding simultaneously in carefully selected areas of tiny Israel would probably take out most of it's population and infrastructure, but I believe the IDF has the ability to massively retaliate with multiple nukes of it's own even if the homeland is virtually destroyed.

32 posted on 07/20/2006 9:14:42 AM PDT by epow (.Psalm 122:6 , Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: epow



See Post #29 above.

.


33 posted on 07/20/2006 9:31:27 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Ahmadinawhackjob to the civilized world:

"Bite me."


34 posted on 07/20/2006 10:03:37 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (I am a proud friend of Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook
I think your #29 is correct, the morons in Tehran really believe the Mahdi is about to appear and lead the Islamic military forces to victory over all their infidel enemies. Even if they die in the great battles they believe they will be amply rewarded by Allah for their dedication to his cause.

This is the same kind of Muslim religious fanaticism that led the Islamic Sudanese tribesmen to revolt against the British and their Egyptian vassal government in the late 19th century. They believed the Mahdi had returned in the person of their tribal chief, and in the end 20,000 of them were slaughtered at the Battle of Omdurman in 1898 by Lord Kitchener's Anglo-Egyptian army.

Winston Churchill played an active part in that battle as a young British cavalry trooper and wrote about it in his book "The River War". It's a very interesting read for anyone with an interest in the history of that time and place.

35 posted on 07/20/2006 10:14:44 AM PDT by epow (.Psalm 122:6 , Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
We'll meet again,

Don't know where,

Don't know when,

But I know We'll meet again Some sunny day.


36 posted on 07/20/2006 11:18:24 AM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Well, already we have Russia and Finland saying Israel goes too far. A Spanish PM supporting the Palestinians and a French PM saying Israel goes too far. Dont be surprised if China starts weighing this opinions against Israel as well.


37 posted on 07/20/2006 9:10:50 PM PDT by rjp2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: epow
So what? At that point, what's to save?
38 posted on 07/20/2006 9:15:32 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

The C-802 is not a silkworm, it is a much more advanced missile.


39 posted on 07/21/2006 6:30:57 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Thanks. I had seen it referred to using both designations.

So the Iranians are willing to give their most advanced weaponry to terrorist groups.

40 posted on 07/21/2006 6:55:54 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson