Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Civil rights hiring shifted in Bush era (Whine Alert)
Boston Globe ^ | July 23, 2006 | Charlie Savage

Posted on 07/23/2006 3:35:59 AM PDT by RWR8189

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is quietly remaking the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, filling the permanent ranks with lawyers who have strong conservative credentials but little experience in civil rights, according to job application materials obtained by the Globe.

The documents show that only 42 percent of the lawyers hired since 2003, after the administration changed the rules to give political appointees more influence in the hiring process, have civil rights experience. In the two years before the change, 77 percent of those who were hired had civil rights backgrounds.

In an acknowledgment of the department's special need to be politically neutral, hiring for career jobs in the Civil Rights Division under all recent administrations, Democratic and Republican, had been handled by civil servants -- not political appointees.

But in the fall of 2002, then-attorney general John Ashcroft changed the procedures. The Civil Rights Division disbanded the hiring committees made up of veteran career lawyers

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ashcroft; bush43; civilrights; doj; govwatch; justice

1 posted on 07/23/2006 3:36:01 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

So what. These days, "civil rights" is the playground of black racists and shakedown artists. Not as important as it use to be, unless you're one of the Perpetually Indignant.


2 posted on 07/23/2006 3:44:02 AM PDT by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Yet another reason to vote GOP in 2006.


3 posted on 07/23/2006 3:47:49 AM PDT by Terpfen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Humm, those National Bar Assn members are black conservatives, I guess. If those people leaving are anything like that Mary Barry, I say good riddance.


4 posted on 07/23/2006 4:24:36 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

in other words, "W" has managed to weed out some of the ACLU plants in the Justice Department, kudos.


5 posted on 07/23/2006 4:27:05 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Oh...so previous to the Bush administration, these civil rights jobs were set aside for black lawyers. That sounds like quota hiring to me, which is against the civil rights laws in this country.


6 posted on 07/23/2006 4:28:01 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Wait til they see what happens in the future when, as I actively encourage, veteran's preference in employment and education becomes a much, much stronger factor than the enfeebled state it holds today.

Then, the real whining will begin around capitols and colleges.


7 posted on 07/23/2006 4:32:34 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (WARNING: Alcohol may cause you to think you are whispering when you are definitely not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Should read "Lawyers that cant make the grade in private practice were picked out to take up space in the Civil Rights division."

I imagine a lot of graduates from Howard U. will now have to look elsewhere.


8 posted on 07/23/2006 4:41:09 AM PDT by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
We need to follow through with the same hiring or displacement programs at the CIA, State, FBI.
Accd. to releases it's lawyers that do the leaking or connecting with the NYT.
It's liberal lawyers doing damage, including damaging the country, for the good of the party.
9 posted on 07/23/2006 4:42:18 AM PDT by hermgem (The same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

Absolutely. In my opinion they should abolish the entire division and not renew the voting rights act. Once the Feds create a something it is hard to get rid of the useless bureaucrats.


10 posted on 07/23/2006 4:44:50 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
my goodness maybe George Will and Bill Kristol will tell the conservatives that Bush is not doing anything to change government and that all he has done is spend money. Except some things he has done is appoint some very conservative judges, fight a war on two fronts, support Israel and trash France,elect plenty of conservative republicans including John Thune who now wants to distance himself from the President.

But what about energy? The friend of drilling has opened the national forests, taken plenty of changes in rules on ESA birds off lists, reopened drilling on our coastline. Did I mention he appointed some tough people in the FBI, the UN and at the state department? /rant off

11 posted on 07/23/2006 5:43:35 AM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Oh NO! HOW COULD W DO THIS? How could he dare put his own guys in these slots?


12 posted on 07/23/2006 6:08:29 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (John Spencer: Fighting to save America from Hillary Clinton..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: RWR8189
"The Civil Rights Division disbanded the hiring committees made up of veteran career lawyers... Hires with traditional civil rights backgrounds -- either civil rights litigators or members of civil rights groups -- have plunged...Meanwhile, conservative credentials have risen sharply. Since 2003 the three sections have hired 11 lawyers who said they were members of the conservative Federalist Society. Seven hires in the three sections are listed as members of the Republican National Lawyers Association, including two who volunteered for Bush-Cheney campaigns."

hmmmm......

oh well, I tried :-)

14 posted on 07/23/2006 6:37:09 AM PDT by Condor51 (Better to fight for something than live for nothing - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The Boston Globus Hystericus is owned by the NY Slimes. This is what we would expect from the Ny Slimes Farm Team in Boston.

How many Freepers, who hate the NY Slimes, are supporting the NY Slimes with their mutual funds. Without mutual funds owning the NY Slimes non voting stock, the NYT would be in real trouble.

How do I find out if my mutual funds own NYT Stock, and what can I do if they do?

Here is something, we can all do today to start eliminating the NY Slimes as a threat to our nation's security. We can do it at our computers and do it in less than 1 hour. Besides sending a severe warning to the NY Slimes and the mutual fund companies, who buy NY Slimes stock, we will stop the fund company wasting our precious investment capital on NY Slimes stock.

If a few thousand freepers did this simple action this week and a few thousand new freepers, friends and relatives each following week, we will have a terminal impact on the NY Slimes acts of sedition. Please send this how to your blogs, friends, relatives and email lists. This action will serve as a cannon shot across the bows fo the other Dinosaur Liberal Fish Wraps re sedition will not be tolerated any more, and any mutual fund daring to buy their stock to support treason and sedition by the NY Slimes.

TODAY, SELL/TRADE MUTUAL FUNDS OWNING NYT!!!:

 

Want to smash the NY Slimes?
Check your mutual funds to see if they own NYT, the NY Slimes Stock

 

 

How many of us own mutual funds which own NY Slimes stock and even worse have increased their NYT holdings this year.

NYT investment by a mutual fund company is a terrible investment re the dollar loss in Stock value the last 2 years. Those investments are an attempt to keep the NY Slimes afloat with our mutual fund $'s.

Now it is very evident that the NY Slimes is an agent and abettor of the al Qaeda Serial Killers. The Slimes is endangering the lives of our families, friends, innocent Americans and every warrior of ours.

Go to this link to see if your mutual fund owns NYT.

http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/ownership/ownership.asp

When the MS Money stock home page comes up, enter NYT into the search area and hit enter and the following screen will show up re ownership of the NY Slimes stock:

The New York Times Company: Ownership Information

  • Shares Outstanding 145.00 Mil

  • Institutional Ownership (%) 83.40

  • Top 10 Institutions (%) 58.60

  • Mutual Fund Ownership (%) 42.64

  • 5%/Insider Ownership (%) 7.77

  • Float (%)

Highlight the Mutual Fund Ownership and hit enter.

If thousands of Freepers, whose mutual funds own shares of NY Slimes did the following:

  1. Sell those mutual funds or trade them for funds not owning NYT.

  2. Send a letter to the fund managers and the CEO's of the mutual fund company telling them why you sold/transferred their mutual fund owning NY Slimes stock. Then demand to know why they are wasting your precious $'s on a treasonous/seditious company which is a terrible investment.

  3. Contact the SEC to investigate why this mutual fund and mutual fund company invested your $'s in one of the worse investments of the past 2 years. On 21 July 2006, NYT closed at the low for this decade. If your mutual fund owns, NYT, was the investment of yours and others a political bailout of the NY Slimes?

    The link below will take you to the SEC site and enable you to use the email form shown on this page. Or you can print the form, fill it out and mail it to the SEC.


    https://tts.sec.gov/acts-ics/do/complaint


  4. Send this how to re Mutual Funds with NYT stock to everyone on your email list for a wakeup call.

We might have a lot more impact selling/trading any mutual fund, which owns NYT, than trying to boycott companies which sell to the elite liberals of NYC and advertise in the NY Slimes.



15 posted on 07/23/2006 7:53:00 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (There's a dwindling market for Marxist Homosexual Lunatic wet dreams posing as journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
...who have strong conservative credentials but little experience in civil rights...

it was impossible to obtain experience in "civil rights" if one was conservative.

16 posted on 07/23/2006 8:44:09 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

Don't forget women.

Title 9 has eviserated college sports, and women's softball teams have 44 members (with an average of 5 on field at any time) so the few remaining mens sports can exist.

Nevermind that mens sports were at least self sustaining, and that claim can be made about very few women's sports.


17 posted on 07/23/2006 1:28:14 PM PDT by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson