Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limits proposed on digital TV converter coupons
Washington Post ^ | Monday, July 24, 2006; 4:34 PM | Jeremy Pelofsky

Posted on 07/25/2006 11:12:56 AM PDT by VRWCtaz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An estimated 21 million U.S. households, those that rely solely on over-the-air television broadcasts, would be eligible to get coupons to buy digital converter boxes, according to a Commerce Department agency proposal released on Monday.

Coupons would not be offered to a majority of U.S. households because they already have an alternative. The Government Accountability Office estimates about 85 million households watch television using cable or satellite services.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: govwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
I don't know where to start with this. Maybe we should begin with the US Commerce Department television converter clause in the Constitution.
1 posted on 07/25/2006 11:12:57 AM PDT by VRWCtaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VRWCtaz

To heck with the converter coupons, where is my HDTV coupon? I want it NOW.


2 posted on 07/25/2006 11:14:47 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCtaz

I bought one for camping, a portable tv and was given no warning this was going to happen - where is my coupon?


3 posted on 07/25/2006 11:16:34 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
To heck with the converter coupons, where is my HDTV coupon? I want it NOW.

It is only fair.

4 posted on 07/25/2006 11:16:56 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I know I should be able to come up with a SA comment regarding school vouchers and TV coupons...


5 posted on 07/25/2006 11:19:00 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (A challenge to Liberals: I will read any book you name - if you will do the same. (very few takers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VRWCtaz

Shear Foolishness!


6 posted on 07/25/2006 11:20:09 AM PDT by Rodm (Seest thou a man diligent in his business? He shall stand before kings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
"I bought one for camping, "

Obviousy, you don't belong to the Democrat voter-base. Their constituents have learned not to BUY anything; wait for the Democrats to protest, whine, finger-point, and name-call until the Gubmint gets people like you to pay for the free-loaders' every wanted item.

Now, when the "middle class" that Hildabeast is talking about gets their "free" medical coverage, and then their free "Mercedes, BMW, or Cadillac" that YOU as a taxpayer will be required to pay for, you will learn how the Democrat voter thinks.........

7 posted on 07/25/2006 11:20:26 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
More from the story:"The National Association of Broadcasters said it expected NTIA to focus on homes that rely on over-the-air broadcasts.

"However, we would hope that no broadcast-only TV sets are forced to go dark during this transition," said NAB spokesman Dennis Wharton."

You may still have a chance!

8 posted on 07/25/2006 11:22:00 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (A challenge to Liberals: I will read any book you name - if you will do the same. (very few takers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

"Democrat voter thinks........"

How do they do that?

I don't think this ever happened, you're telling stories now aren't you?


9 posted on 07/25/2006 11:23:12 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VRWCtaz
If the entire $1.5 billion was used, the government could offer coupons for 37.5 million television sets. The law, approved last year, permits eligible homes to receive up to two coupons, each worth $40.

Are the idiots in congress seriously suggesting that the federal government needs to subsidize the costs of converter boxes for TWO televisions per household doesn't have cable or satellite television subscriptions?

I can go out and buy a new, low end DVD player for $40.

A tuner box for HD TV is not going to be a big expense, at least not after a few months go by and the market drives down the price.

However, it the government offers $40 coupons, the converters will definitely cost at least $40 if not $50-$60 since the government will have artificially raised the price consumers are willing to pay.

This is a huge government handout to consumer electronics companies, and since the US is not a major player in that market, it's mainly a gift to foreign companies.

This is really, really stupid.

10 posted on 07/25/2006 11:29:55 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

You just THINK you were being sarcastic. Just wait until we hear of inner-city programs to do just that!

I remember clearly all the programs to get internet-ready PC's in the hands/homes of the poor inner-city families.... Yeah and those same-said computers wound up for sale and in pawn shops within days...


11 posted on 07/25/2006 11:30:02 AM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VRWCtaz

I think Congress budgeted something like $8B for converters but cannot find the stones to pony up $1B for border fencing.


12 posted on 07/25/2006 11:31:48 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead (Doing the jobs Americans won't do? Guess you haven't seen "Dirty Jobs")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
""Democrat voter thinks........"

How do they do that?

I don't think this ever happened, you're telling stories now aren't you?"

You're right; my bad....

13 posted on 07/25/2006 11:32:34 AM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VRWCtaz

TV networks are poor and need help so Congress passed this subsidy for them. It has nothing to do with bribes/campaign contributions given to congressmen.

/sarc


14 posted on 07/25/2006 11:39:25 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

"This is really, really stupid."

Congress and Bush signed off on it.


15 posted on 07/25/2006 11:41:20 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rodm

"Shear Foolishness!"

No, scissors won't work. You really have to have the converter.


16 posted on 07/25/2006 11:42:29 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
"Are the idiots in congress seriously suggesting..."

No, the Idiots at the US Commerce Department are suggesting - the Idiots in Congress are just authorizing 1.5B for it.

17 posted on 07/25/2006 11:46:18 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (A challenge to Liberals: I will read any book you name - if you will do the same. (very few takers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
However, it the government offers $40 coupons, the converters will definitely cost at least $40 if not $50-$60 since the government will have artificially raised the price consumers are willing to pay.

The perfect example is government subsidized education, I see all the colleges and universities raised their prices another 5 percent this year.

Nothing will ever cost less than the amount it is subsidized for.

18 posted on 07/25/2006 11:51:42 AM PDT by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Yes Congress and the President authorized this, and it was "really, really stupid" then as well.


19 posted on 07/25/2006 11:51:46 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (A challenge to Liberals: I will read any book you name - if you will do the same. (very few takers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here
You need to get with the program. There is no place for a rational/logical/factual argument in a discussion of a new government entitlement subsidy. /s
20 posted on 07/25/2006 11:55:40 AM PDT by VRWCtaz (A challenge to Liberals: I will read any book you name - if you will do the same. (very few takers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson