Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'm sure our one party media will have a field day investigating this development.

(Just kidding of course.)

1 posted on 07/28/2006 1:42:21 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: Deb; kcvl; Mo1; Enchante; veronica; stocksthatgoup; mewzilla; backhoe; BushisTheMan; Grampa Dave; ..

Iraqi WMD ping.


2 posted on 07/28/2006 1:43:31 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

They won't ever waste their time with anything that's true and accurate;)
BUT, now that they're in Syria, where will they go next? Heads up Israel!


4 posted on 07/28/2006 1:45:33 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas; eyespysomething

Ping WMD Docs.


5 posted on 07/28/2006 1:46:54 PM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Nah, this looks just like that scrap of paper that Dan Rather used to nail Bush on the whole Air Guard thing. /sarc off.


6 posted on 07/28/2006 1:47:23 PM PDT by SFC Chromey (We are at war with Islamists, now ACT LIKE IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

O

M

F

G

good find


7 posted on 07/28/2006 1:48:28 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Islam is a perversion of faith, a lie against human spirit, an obscenity shouted in the face of G_d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jveritas

ping, can you read the second doc in Arabic?


8 posted on 07/28/2006 1:48:30 PM PDT by mnehring (Texas is no Joke! Perry 06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

This backs up David Kays concerns from years ago.......


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/25/wirq2...


"But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a
lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of
Saddam's WMD programme.

AND

http://www.nysun.com/article/26514

"The man who served as the no. 2 official in Saddam Hussein's air force says
Iraq moved weapons of mass destruction into Syria before the war by loading
the weapons into civilian aircraft in which the passenger seats were removed."



9 posted on 07/28/2006 1:49:18 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SuzyQue

marker


10 posted on 07/28/2006 1:49:19 PM PDT by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
Sam, I am a bit skeptical on this one. A convoy of fifty trucks just before the invasion?

We had to have been monitoring that place constantly, plus our guys on the ground.

Fifty trucks is a long convoy, tough to miss on satelite images.


11 posted on 07/28/2006 1:49:20 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other peoples money -- M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: texas_mrs

MAJOR PING


12 posted on 07/28/2006 1:51:02 PM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
The media can fool some of the people some of the time, but:

Harris Pollsters Surprised at Poll Results: Half of Americans Believe Iraq had WMDs when U.S. Invaded
Jennifer Harper TN (Jul 26, 2006)
More at Washington Times

Fifty-five percent believe history will give U.S. credit for bringing freedom to Iraq.

A recent Harris Poll has found that half of Americans now say Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when the United States invaded the country in 2003 -- up from 36 percent last year. According to reporter Jennifer Harper, pollsters deemed the increase both "substantial" and "surprising," in light of persistent press reports to the contrary in recent years.

As reported in The Washington Times, other results offered positive feedback on Iraq: "Seventy-two percent of respondents said the Iraqi people are better off now than under Saddam Hussein's regime, and in addition, 64 percent say Saddam had "strong links" with al Qaeda, up from 62 percent in October 2004. Fifty-five percent said that "history will give the U.S. credit for bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq."

Also, notes Harper, "41 percent say the war has reduced the threat of another major terrorist attack in the United States, a sentiment also unchanged in the past two years." / end excerpt

13 posted on 07/28/2006 1:51:30 PM PDT by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

It will be deinied to the end.


15 posted on 07/28/2006 1:52:20 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Even with this the media and left has spun the issue into oblivion. The administration shows no signs of revisiting the issue. I wish it was otherwise.


17 posted on 07/28/2006 1:52:35 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

bttt


19 posted on 07/28/2006 1:52:57 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
I think this is consistent with what Colin Powell told the UN Security Council just before the start of the war.

I believe that he also showed aerial photos showing this massive activity at the Iraq/Syria border.

20 posted on 07/28/2006 1:53:15 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
I'm sure our one party media will have a field day investigating this development.

Might help if Bush, Rice, Rove, Snow, anyone in the Administration would push the point.

24 posted on 07/28/2006 1:55:17 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

I bet there's a mad scramble at 60 Minutes to get this story on the air this weekend...not.


25 posted on 07/28/2006 1:55:17 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
I'm sure our one party media will have a field day investigating this development.

(Just kidding dreaming of course.)

26 posted on 07/28/2006 1:55:39 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

I'm curious what Moharram 10th translates to on the normal calendar. Spec Op folks were already in Iraq weeks before the war. Rehearsals for raids on suspected WMD sites were no doubt conducted months in advance and those sites monitored by satellite. Any convoy of 50 trucks is going to be suspicious whether it leaves one of those sites or not. Even a convoy of 10 trucks is going to be suspicious if it's crossing into Syria soon before the war. Keep in mind that Arabs tend to exaggerate wildly. A convoy of 50 trucks filled with WMD might be, in reality, 2 bongo trucks full of watermelon.


35 posted on 07/28/2006 2:06:55 PM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
50 trucks is a hell of a long line of trucks. It would have been pretty hard for us to miss during pre-war surveillance.
36 posted on 07/28/2006 2:09:50 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson