Skip to comments.
Report: China has deployed missiles giving it second-strike capability against U.S.
Insight Magazine ^
| 8/7/2006
| Staff
Posted on 08/07/2006 11:49:46 AM PDT by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
1
posted on
08/07/2006 11:49:52 AM PDT
by
Paul Ross
To: Paul Ross
We are just a frog in a frying pan, while China, North Korea, and Iran is manning the skillet.
2
posted on
08/07/2006 11:51:58 AM PDT
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?")
To: Paul Ross
"For China, nuclear weapons largely have four purposes: one, strategic deterrence; two, retaliation; three, counter-coercion; and four, great-power status,"
It seems to me, second strike missles are a good thing.
3
posted on
08/07/2006 11:52:18 AM PDT
by
staytrue
To: Paul Ross
Thanks to Bill Clinton.
Say, whatever happened to that "Chinagate" investigation anyway? Of that's right.... There wasn't any.
4
posted on
08/07/2006 11:52:32 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: GOP_1900AD; Alamo-Girl; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; ALOHA RONNIE; maui_hawaii; JohnHuang2; ...
Ping.
Underestimation by Panda Huggers politically appointed in DOD...of Chinese nuclear threat capability confirmed yet again.
5
posted on
08/07/2006 11:53:14 AM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Tulsa Ramjet
And we're paying for the propane.
6
posted on
08/07/2006 11:53:42 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: Jeff Head
Perhaps of interest.
7
posted on
08/07/2006 11:53:43 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: staytrue
Why are these "second-strike" missiles unsuitable for a first strike?
8
posted on
08/07/2006 11:56:20 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(The worst thing about censorship is XXXXXXXXXXXXX)
To: Paul Ross
I don't believe this report. Everyone knows our trade with China has changed it forever. We're save now!
9
posted on
08/07/2006 11:56:44 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
To: cripplecreek
We are not only paying for for it, we are making it. and shipping it back in american dollars by buying their qualit products to pay for their government to gain second strike capability. Everyone is to blame. The consumer, the new "general contractor" corporations we have now, the politicians, and general apathy. And I heard the General Apathy is getting a promotion.
10
posted on
08/07/2006 11:56:58 AM PDT
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?")
To: Paul Ross
Oh for Christ sake...1. H-Rod will never be POTUS. 2. If china ever launched a nuke strike against us...that would be the end of China...they're be a lot of Friy Wryce..to go around.
If they want to spend money to build missiles, let'em (china)...as long as we build up our defensive capabilities as well as retarget, and improve, our existing arsenal to deal with China. Last couple of articles I read on our (U.S.) Defensive/Strategic posture...we're doing exactly that.
11
posted on
08/07/2006 11:59:14 AM PDT
by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: DoughtyOne; RightWhale; Tailgunner Joe
Everyone knows our trade with China has changed it forever.But not in a good way. Still communist. But now they have our technology.
12
posted on
08/07/2006 11:59:24 AM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
To: Paul Ross
Why does China think we will attack them??
13
posted on
08/07/2006 11:59:45 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Bolton- "No one has explained how you negotiate a ceasefire with terrorists")
To: DoughtyOne
Insight has only a slightly better track record than Debka.
14
posted on
08/07/2006 11:59:51 AM PDT
by
aynrandfreak
(The Left hates America)
To: DoughtyOne
To: thoughtomator
Second strike missles are better than "use them or lose them" first strike missles.
Of course they can be used as a first strike, but no one uses nukes if the other guy can hit you back. That means no one but the towel heads are going to nuke the US.
16
posted on
08/07/2006 12:00:44 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: Tulsa Ramjet
After the first exchange, who really cares?
17
posted on
08/07/2006 12:00:48 PM PDT
by
zarf
To: Paul Ross
18
posted on
08/07/2006 12:02:07 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Bring your press credentials to Qana, for the world's most convincing terrorist street theater.)
To: Tulsa Ramjet
That's what they say:
"The capitalist will sell us the rope we will hang them with"
19
posted on
08/07/2006 12:02:08 PM PDT
by
observer5
(It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
To: DoughtyOne
We're save now! All our bases are belong to the China people.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson