Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reuters admits to more image manipulation
Ynetnews.com ^ | 8.7.06 | Yaakov Lappin

Posted on 08/08/2006 3:33:50 AM PDT by Efraty

News organization withdraws photograph of Israeli fighter jet, admits image was doctored, fires photographer. Reuters pledges 'tighter editing procedure for images of the Middle East conflict'

(Excerpt) Read more at ynetnews.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Unclassified; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: adnanhajj; deceit; fabrication; fauxtography; hizbullah; islamoganda; israel; lebanon; medialies; middleeast; mideastconflict; reuterrorism; reuters; syria; terror; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: johnny7
That Reuters is not openly condemned by all western news organizations speaks volumes. The scale/depth of deceit in this conflict is mind-boggling.

These characters are no friends of America, or Americans. They wish us ill.

21 posted on 08/08/2006 4:30:41 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Efraty
A spokesmen for Reuters said "Next time we hire a photographer we need to send him to a PhotoShop course and he has to pass testing. We can't have these amateurs messing everything up."
23 posted on 08/08/2006 4:34:53 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
How about every reuters picture is required to have the "not-altered written guarentee" next to the photo credit.

Dan Rather is missing a huge opportunity. Just like when master theifs and forgers become consultants, Dan could turn his image around and become the authority on forged news and create the Dan Rather seal of approval.

24 posted on 08/08/2006 4:37:18 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Kofi just can't get enough of those wacky Hezbollians.


25 posted on 08/08/2006 4:55:03 AM PDT by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda
Koffee: Billy boy,..uh..I've got this oil for food scandal coming up in the near future, and I might need your help. If everything works out, and our boy Kerry is elected, I'll push for you as my replacement at the U.N. You should check out my office. Oh, I've got a t-shirt for you. It says "My peacekeepers went to Darfur, and all I got was this T-shirt." Bill: Just remember to bite your lower lip and always put a thumbs up, which subconsciously reminds people to let you live. Koffee: Got it.
26 posted on 08/08/2006 4:56:47 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Does anybody know if the newspapers who published these are running retractions?


27 posted on 08/08/2006 5:05:25 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Efraty
Look at the flares -- they're all identical in size and shape.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

28 posted on 08/08/2006 5:07:48 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Efraty

-Eric

29 posted on 08/08/2006 5:24:48 AM PDT by E Rocc (Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TN4Bush
Their idea was that only actual film photos should be used for news reporting so authenticity could be verified.

Unfortunately raw film has had the same problem for at least 15 years. Hollywood has been using film printers in special affects at least since 1991. Basically what the film printer does is print digital images onto any film type. At least for the last 15 years it has been just about impossible (except for perhaps a tiny few hard cores) to tell if an old fashioned SLR or a film printer took the image.

30 posted on 08/08/2006 5:34:42 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Wow, is that what the original picture looked like? - no wonder they doctored it.
31 posted on 08/08/2006 5:43:55 AM PDT by vimto (Blighty Awaken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

This one might be staged:


32 posted on 08/08/2006 6:03:44 AM PDT by Lil'freeper (You do not have the plug-in required to view this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TN4Bush

A possible solution is to download the original chip to the newspaper and mark the photos to be used.

Doesn't stop deliberate distortion by the paper, but would stop rogue photojournalists.


33 posted on 08/08/2006 6:46:38 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Bam, Fox just televised three other photos we're working on... re: staging of sites by Hizzies. About time they got to the staging. Ping me to any staging videos you come across. Thanks.


34 posted on 08/08/2006 6:54:49 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Talk to those who kill their own children, by Jihad/PR ? Remember Beslan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc

35 posted on 08/08/2006 6:57:23 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Paula Zahn is doing a story on this on CNN tonight.


36 posted on 08/08/2006 6:57:50 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnny7; gaspar; backhoe
It is now obvious... that Reuters is an active player in the international leftist/Islamo-fascist alliance. That Reuters is not openly condemned by all western news organizations speaks volumes.
The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing . . . It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. - Adam Smith

Half the truth can be a very big lie. - Winston Churchill

So much for your "right to know."

You do not have a "right to know" anything. You do have a right to your own opinion, and you have the right to promote your opinion with your voice and with your money - and to listen to whoever interests you and to ignore whoever does not interest you.

You want the truth, you read FreeRepublic.com - especially the postings by conservatism_IS_compassion - and then think for yourself.


37 posted on 08/08/2006 7:26:38 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: randita

AND... the vapor-trails.


38 posted on 08/08/2006 7:33:34 AM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

39 posted on 08/08/2006 8:04:06 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

ROTFLMAO!


40 posted on 08/08/2006 8:08:12 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson