Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suspect's DNA is a match in JonBenet Ramsey case
KUSA-TV | 8/16/06 | KUSA-TV

Posted on 08/16/2006 4:35:14 PM PDT by varyouga

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-428 last
To: hoosiermama

will do, thanks.


421 posted on 08/20/2006 12:47:32 PM PDT by vox_freedom (Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
You might want to place this article on a thread of its own to preserve it.

>>sundayherald.com cannot be posted due to copyright complaint.

Well, I tried.

422 posted on 08/20/2006 12:54:42 PM PDT by vox_freedom (Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: MAWG

Well now.....I guess I'm not privy to autopsy reports, police reports, lie detector reports, DNA reports, DA reports and all of the other 'official' reports on this investigation as you apparently are! Well, excuse the F out of me! Seems to me that all you've bought into as well are books from people wanting sell books, people with agendas, people with emotional sympathy or other such silliness. I will leave you and your (and all the rest of you sympathizers) alone from now on. BTA!


423 posted on 08/20/2006 1:24:16 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: MAWG

Well now.....I guess I'm not privy to autopsy reports, police reports, lie detector reports, DNA reports, DA reports and all of the other 'official' reports on this investigation as you apparently are! Well, excuse the F out of me! Seems to me that all you've bought into as well are books from people wanting sell books, people with agendas, people with emotional sympathy or other such silliness. I will leave you and your (and all the rest of you sympathizers) alone from now on. BTA!


424 posted on 08/20/2006 1:26:29 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
You're right. I had you mixed up with the other person who'd come at me simultaneously with you. The word should have been Calumny and I guess it's an unforgivable mistake to actually type things wrong around here.

It may turn out that there is some doubt about his alibi, but from what I've heard and seen from his demeanor on TV, he's an attention hound and I honestly think that it will be proven. You can castigate me for an assumption for a gut impression, but gut impressions, much like first impressions, are usually right.

425 posted on 08/20/2006 1:31:57 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Just for the record, and in case you're interested, many of these documents are online, some at Court TV's website. I haven't viewed them all either, but I've noticed that they're there. Some folks here are excellent researchers, and probably know almost as much about the case as the DA (probably not quite!)--which is one reason I love FR so much, no matter which topic is at the bat: there will be someone who has thoroughly researched every last bit of information and who can uncover the mistakes and/or frauds when they occur.

I don't do that much of the research, but I sure admire those who do!


426 posted on 08/20/2006 2:11:07 PM PDT by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
I know many people here know more about the case than I do, but I always tend to wonder why? WHY did they take the time? WHAT are their motives and sympathies? Usually, something drives them to do that, and sometimes it isn't impartial.

I am a researcher by profession and whenever I hear a blurb on the radio or TV about "study this, study that, and results show......" it is almost never followed by WHO did the study, WHO paid for it, and WHY was the study initiated. Usually, after what digging I've been compelled to do, there was always some underlying proclivity to have come up with the same answer regardless of the process ---IOW, an outcome based study that really wasn't much of a study at all, but more supporting evidence for a foregone conclusion.

427 posted on 08/21/2006 4:19:54 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: MAWG
It really doesnt matter to me if the dna matches or not. I hope that it does and this 10 year nightmare is over.

No, what matters to you is you think the Ramseys are absolutely without blame in this matter. I don't. Even if they did not actually kill that little girl, their behavior from the word go (and you trying to rationalize it is reprehensible) is and bloody well should be suspect.

And no matter how much you want it not to be, that ransom note is 100% relevant.

428 posted on 08/21/2006 7:06:21 AM PDT by Houmatt (Democrats eat urinal cakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-428 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson