To: pbrown; MikefromOhio; sinkspur; Valin
Yeah, so am I, so is MikefromOhio, so is Valin, so is sinkspur, and a horde of others who defend Muslims simply because we don't believe in indicting people wholesale because they share a common creed with their evil counterparts. We are all Dhimmis and/or Muslim jihadis.
Customary ping, per FR rule. Sorry to disturb you guys. :(
45 posted on
08/25/2006 9:31:13 PM PDT by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: Killborn
I figured either muslim or dhimmies.
49 posted on
08/25/2006 9:36:32 PM PDT by
processing please hold
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: Killborn; pbrown; MikefromOhio; sinkspur; Valin
Yeah, so am I, so is MikefromOhio, so is Valin, so is sinkspur, and a horde of others who defend Muslims simply because we don't believe in indicting people wholesale because they share a common creed with their evil counterparts. Therefore it is incumbent upon each of those named to actively solicit the cooperation of your fellow adherents. For if this does not occur, the implications are horrific, to say the least. There must be a reformation; or at the very least an open and honest exchange. In the absence of an open and honest exchange, there will be an introverted and isolationist reaction. Unfortunately.
To: Killborn
"Yeah, so am I, so is MikefromOhio, so is Valin, so is sinkspur, and a horde of others who defend Muslims simply because we don't believe in indicting people wholesale because they share a common creed with their evil counterparts."Read that common belief.
106 posted on
08/25/2006 10:48:36 PM PDT by
blackbart.223
(I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson