Posted on 09/09/2006 8:07:18 AM PDT by rubeng
WASHINGTON (AP) - Saddam Hussein rejected overtures from al-Qaida and believed Islamic extremists were a threat to his regime, a reverse portrait of an Iraq allied with Osama bin Laden painted by the Bush White House, a Senate panel has found.
The administration's version was based in part on intelligence that White House officials knew was flawed, according to Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee, citing newly declassified documents released by the panel.
The report, released Friday, discloses for the first time an October 2005 CIA assessment that prior to the war Saddam's government "did not have a relationship, harbor or turn a blind eye toward" al-Qaida operative Abu Musab al-Zarqawi or his associates.
As recently as an Aug. 21 news conference, President Bush said people should "imagine a world in which you had Saddam Hussein" with the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction and "who had relations with Zarqawi." ...
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...
The British stand by their intelligence reports on Niger. Unlike our own CIA that that had a rogue group trying to undermine this POTUS at a time of war with forged documents. Forged documents that had the names and dates wrong, according to the proven LIAR Joe Wilson, yet how could he have known this because the alleged forged documents were not in our possession at the time? Heh Liberal Larry, they are missing you at the institute of higher learing for donks, Kos land, where the facts don't matter, we will make our own up as we go along.
Thanks, though, for the encouraging reminder of the advances made through the new media! I think it will be a good week-end, after all...
And they're just getting around to announcing it now.
"The RATS are all over this one. Not sure who was on the Senate panel but I'm sure it was heavily leaning left."
You gotta love Clinton. First get it out that 9/11 and Iraq are not related. Then get the movie edited or canned.
Now all you have is BLAME BUSH!
Thank you.
You're 100% correct. I read the pertinent sections of the report yesterday and was absolutely shocked at how few people were relied on to gather this information.
There was no thinking outside the box and little if any reliance on foreign sources.
And I should have mentioned - Dick Cheney has a chance tomorrow to set a few things straight on Meet the Press tomorrow. We'll see if he steps up to the plate or gives it a pass.
So far, I've been disappointed with the administration's willingness to let the reports from Congress stand as the final arbiter of truth.
Good job!
ummmm....why did you send me the list?
How does the CIA square that fewer than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper Al-Nasiriya carried a column headlined, American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin. (July 21, 2001)
In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.
The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden will strike America on the arm that is already hurting, and that the US will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, New York, New York.
Are we supposed to just believe that Osama and Saddam were gossiping over the backyard fence?
Senate Dems don't understand "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" doctrine of the Middle East.
Senate Intelligence = oxymoron
A summary of the forged documents came into our possession shortly after they were created and were immediately revealed as such.
Get your facts straight before you criticize and confine your mindless insults to your bathroom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.